Advertisement

Evaluation Methods for the Effective Assessment of Simulation Games

A Literature Review
  • Nilüfer Bas
  • Alexander LöfflerEmail author
  • Robert Heininger
  • Matthias Utesch
  • Helmut Krcmar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)

Abstract

Simulation games play an important role in the area of technology-based education. They allow the simulation of real-world problems in a risk-free environment and thereby intend to increase the learning experience of students. However, assessing the effectiveness of a simulation game is necessary to optimize elements of the game and increase the learning effect for students. For this, different evaluation methods exist, which do not always cover all phases when running a simulation game. In this study, we conduct a literature review to analyze evaluation methods for the pre-game, in-game, and post-game assessment of simulation games. In accordance with our inclusion criteria, we selected 31 peer-reviewed articles, and categorized them according to a didactic framework that describes four phases of running simulation games: Preparation, Introduction, Interaction and Conclusion phase. Based on the results, we provide a concrete evaluation strategy that can be used to assess simulation games throughout all phases. This study contributes to theory by providing an overview of evaluation methods for the assessment of simulation games within the different game phases. It contributes to practice by providing a concrete evaluation strategy that can be adapted and used to assess simulation games.

Keywords

Simulation games Serious games Game-based learning Evaluation Assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Hodgetts, R.: Management gaming for didactic purposes: a new look. Simul. Games 1(1), 55–66 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faria, A.J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W.J., Gold, S.: Developments in business gaming: a review of the past 40 years. Simul. Gaming 40(4), 464–487 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lillard, A.S.: Playful learning and Montessori education. Am. J. Play 5(2), 157 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thatcher, D.C.: Promoting learning through games and simulations. Simul. Gaming 21(3), 262–273 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marquardt, M.J., Kearsley, G.: Technology-Based Learning: Maximizing Human Performance and Corporate Success. CRC Press (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baume, M.: Computerunterstützte Planspiele für das Informationsmanagement: Realitätsnahe und praxisorientierte Ausbildung in der universitären Lehre am Beispiel der CIO-Simulation. BoD–Books on Demand (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aldrich, C.: Clark Aldrich’s Six Criteria of an Educational Simulation (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoberg, P., Krcmar, H., Oswald, G., Welz, B.: Skills for Digital Transformation (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: A competency model for Industrie 4.0 employees. In: 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riedel, J.C., Hauge, J.B.: State of the art of serious games for business and industry. In: 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Löffler, A., Prifti, L., Levkovskyi, B., Utesch, M., Krcmar, H.: Simulation games for the digital transformation of business processes. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Utesch, M.C.: A successful approach to study skills: Go4C´ s projects strengthen teamwork. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. (iJEP) 6(1), 35–43 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OECD, CERI: Assessment for learning formative assessment. In: OECD/CERI International Conference on Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation, Policy (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X.: Assessment in Game-Based Learning, pp. 1–8. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shute, V.J.: Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Comput. Games Instr. 55(2), 503–524 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. xiii–xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), vol. 9, pp. 2206–2217 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., Ge, X.: Alternative assessment strategies for complex problem solving in game-based learning environments. In: Multiple Perspectives on Problem Solving and Learning in the Digital Age, pp. 159–178 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Shaban, A., Tronci, M.: A simulation based game approach for teaching operations management topics. In: IEEE Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp. 1–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smyrnaiou, Z., Petropoyloy, E., Menon, S., Zini, V.: From game to guidance: the innovative evaluation approach of the P4G simulation business game. In: Mathematics and Computers in Sciences and in Industry (MCSI), pp. 148–153 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Callaghan, M., Savin-Baden, M., McShane, N., Eguíluz, A.G.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis in engineering education. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 5(1), 77–83 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DiCerbo, K.E.: Building the evidentiary argument in game-based assessment. J. Appl. Test. Technol. 18(S1), 7–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cowley, B., Fantato, M., Jennett, C., Ruskov, M., Ravaja, N.: Learning when serious: psychophysiological evaluation of a technology-enhanced learning game. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(1), 3–16 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tan, J.L., Goh, D.H.-L., Ang, R.P., Huan, V.S.: Participatory evaluation of an educational game for social skills acquisition. Comput. Educ. 64, 70–80 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duin, H., Pourabdollahian, B., Thoben, K.-D., Taisch, M.: On the effectiveness of teaching sustainable global manufacturing with serious gaming. In: Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference, pp. 1–8 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilson, D.W., et al.: Serious games: an evaluation framework and case study. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 638–647 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Utesch, M., Heininger, R., Krcmar, H.: Strengthening study skills by using ERPsim as a new tool within the pupils’ academy of serious gaming. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 592–601 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Utesch, M., Heininger, R., Krcmar. H.: The pupils’ academy of serious gaming: strengthening study skills with ERPsim. In: 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), pp. 93–102 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krassmann, A.L., Paschoal, L.N., Falcade, A., Medina, R.D.: Evaluation of game-based learning approaches through digital serious games in computer science higher education: a systematic mapping. In: 14th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment (SBGames), pp. 43–51 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyle, L., Hancock, F., Seeney, M., Allen, L.: The implementation of team based assessment in serious games. In: Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, pp. 28–35 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bhardwaj, J.: Evaluation of the lasting impacts on employability of co-operative serious game-playing by first year computing students: an exploratory analysis. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zolotaryova, I., Plokha, O.: Serious games: evaluation of the learning outcomes. In: 13th International Conference on Modern Problems of Radio Engineering. Telecommunications and Computer Science (TCSET), pp. 858–862 (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abdellatif, A.J., McCollum, B., McMullan, P.: Serious games: quality characteristics evaluation framework and case study. In: Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), pp. 112–119 (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wideman, H.H., Owston, R.D., Brown, C., Kushniruk, A., Ho, F., Pitts, K.C.: Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: a new tool for gaming research. Simul. Gaming 38(1), 10–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., Ben-Ari, M.: Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Comput. Sci. Educ. 23(3), 239–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Al-Smadi, M., Wesiak, G., Guetl, C.: Assessment in serious games: an enhanced approach for integrated assessment forms and feedback to support guided learning. In: 15th International Conference on in Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 1–6 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zeng, L.Y.: An evaluation system of game-based learning based on data mining. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), pp. 1732–1736 (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hainey, T., Connolly, T.: Evaluating games-based learning (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Merkuryev, Y., Bikovska, J.: Business simulation game development for education and training in supply chain management. In: Asia Modelling Symposium (AMS), pp. 179–184 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    de Carvalho, C.V.: Is game-based learning suitable for engineering education? In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boughzala, I., Bououd, I., Michel, H.: Characterization and evaluation of serious games: a perspective of their use in higher education. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 844–852 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Michel, H.: Characterizing serious games implementation’s strategies: is higher education the new playground of serious games? In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 818–826 (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chatterjee, S., Mohanty, A., Bhattacharya, B.: Computer game-based learning and pedagogical contexts: initial findings from a field study. In: IEEE International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pp. 109–115 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mettler, T., Pinto, R.: Serious games as a means for scientific knowledge transfer: a case from engineering management education. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 62(2), 256–265 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cleophas, C.: Designing serious games for revenue management training and strategy development. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, p. 140 (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Escudeiro, P., Escudeiro, N.: Evaluation of serious games in mobile platforms with QEF: QEF (quantitative evaluation framework). In: IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), pp. 268–271 (2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tantan, O.C., Lang, D., Boughzala, I.: Learning business process management through serious games: feedbacks on the usage of INNOV8. In: 18th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 1, pp. 248–254 (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang, M.C., Xu, Z.T., Hsu, L.H.: On developing the learning game for graph theory: a new design model considering the learners’ reflexiveness. In: 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), pp. 418–422 (2016)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cutumisu, M., Blair, K.P., Chin, D.B., Schwartz, D.L.: Posterlet: a game-based assessment of children’s choices to seek feedback and to revise. J. Learn. Anal. 2(1), 49–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Poels, K.: The Game Experience Questionnaire (2008)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    The Glossary of Education Reform: Interim Assessment. https://www.edglossary.org/interim-assessment/ (2018)
  53. 53.
  54. 54.
    Davis, G.A.: Using a retrospective pre-post questionnaire to determine program impact (2002)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Waite, L., Lyons, C.: The 4 questions of a retrospective and why they work. https://www.infoq.com/articles/4-questions-retrospective (2013)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilüfer Bas
    • 1
  • Alexander Löffler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Heininger
    • 1
  • Matthias Utesch
    • 2
  • Helmut Krcmar
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Staatliche Fachober- und Berufsoberschule Technik MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations