Advertisement

The Challenge of Designing Interactive Scenarios to Train Nurses on Rostering Problems in a Virtual Clinical Unit

  • Catherine Pons LelardeuxEmail author
  • Herve Pingaud
  • Michel Galaup
  • Arthur Ramolet
  • Pierre Lagarrigue
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)

Abstract

The healthcare institutions in leading countries have undergone numerous changes to control their charges. These transformations generate an incredible impact on the work organization specially for caregiving staff. As a consequence, trainers in Nursing Schools need innovative tools to improve their courses. At the same time, there has been an increasing interest for immersive training environments which could represent with great fidelity a professional context. In this article, we present the method we set up to design educational interactive scenarios that take place in a socio-technical dynamic and complex system such as a clinical department. These scenarios aim to train nurses to plan their activity, deliver and organize cares for some fifteen inpatients. Using this method, we build a dozen of interactive non-linear scenarios. These scenario allow the trainee to freely act and make decision which could cause delay or equally bad and even far worse inadequate caregiving.

Keywords

Virtual Environment Serious Game Nurse Rostering Nurse training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

These works are part of a global innovative IT program whose partners are University Champollion and the French Regional Healthcare Agency (Occitanie). The steering committee is composed of Ph.D. C. Pons Lelardeux, Ph.D.M. Galaup, Pr. H. Pingaud, Pr. P. Lagarrigue, C. Mercadier, V. Teilhol.

References

  1. 1.
    Burke, E.K., De Causmaecker, P., Berghe, G.V., Van Landeghem, H.: The state of the art of nurse rostering. J. Sched. 7(6), 441–499 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornes, D.M.: Review of interprofessional education in the United Kingdom (1997–2013). J. Interprofessional Care 29(1), 85–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petit dit Dariel, O.J., Raby, T., Ravaut, F., Rothan-Tondeur, M.: Developing the Serious Games potential in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 33(12), 1569–1575 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo 11(3), 227–235 (1978). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1574154
  5. 5.
    Graafland, M., Schraagen, J.M., Schijven, M.P.: Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. Br. J. Surg. 99(10), 1322–1330 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, J., Feijs, L.: A distributed multi-agent architecture in simulation based medical training. In: Pan, Z., Cheok, A.D., Mller, W., Chang, M. (eds.) Transactions on Edutainment III, pp. 105–115. No. 5940 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kilmon, C.A., Brown, L., Ghosh, S., Mikitiuk, A.: Immersive virtual reality simulations in nursing education. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 31(5), 314–317 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Boterf, G.: Valuer les comptences. Quels jugements? Quels critres? Quelles instances. Educ. Perm. 135(2), 143–151 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lelardeux, C.P., Panzoli, D., Galaup, M., Minville, V., Lubrano, V., Lagarrigue, P., Jessel, J.P.: 3d real-time collaborative environment to learn teamwork and non-technical skills in the operating room. In: Interactive Collaborative Learning. pp. 143–157. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marfisi-Schottman, I., George, S.: Supporting teachers to design and use mobile collaborative learning games. In: International Conference on Mobile Learning, pp. 3–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martens, C., Bosser, A.G., Ferreira, J.F., Cavazza, M.: Linear logic programming for narrative generation. In: International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 427–432. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norman, D.A.: Cognitive artifacts. Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface, vol. 1, pp. 17–38 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Pons Lelardeux
    • 1
    Email author
  • Herve Pingaud
    • 2
  • Michel Galaup
    • 3
  • Arthur Ramolet
    • 4
  • Pierre Lagarrigue
    • 5
  1. 1.IRITUniversity of Toulouse (France), INU Champollion, Serious Game Research NetworkToulouseFrance
  2. 2.LGCUniversity of Toulouse (France), INU Champollion, Serious Game Research NetworkToulouseFrance
  3. 3.EFTSUniversity of Toulouse (France), INU Champollion, Serious Game Research NetworkToulouseFrance
  4. 4.SGRLUniversity of Toulouse (France), INU Champollion, Serious Game Research NetworkToulouseFrance
  5. 5.ICAUniversity of Toulouse (France), INU Champollion, Serious Game Research NetworkToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations