A Process of Design and Production of Virtual Reality Learning Environments

  • Lahcen Oubahssi
  • Oussema Mahdi
  • Claudine Piau-ToffolonEmail author
  • Sébastien Iksal
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)


Facilitating human learning is one of the uses of virtual reality (VR). Users interact within original and dynamic situations of learning in an integrated learning environment called Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE). Nevertheless, the design of these environments is still considered as a complex task. We intend to study and propose technical and methodological solutions to help teachers to design (adapt or reuse) their pedagogical situation with a scenario-based approach and to operationalize it in a VR learning environment. In this work, we defined a design process allowing teachers to generate their VRLE. Then, we instantiated the proposed design process with a pedagogical situation as an illustrated example.


Pedagogical scenario Learning design Educational virtual environments Virtual reality learning environments Pedagogical situation 


  1. 1.
    Mikropoulos, T.A., Chalkidis, A., Katsikis, A., Emvalotis, A.: Students’ attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Educ. Inf. Technol. 3(2), 137–148 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, C.J.: Theoretical bases for using virtual reality in education. Theme. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2(1–2), 71–90 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carpentier, K., Lourdeaux, D.: Generation of learning situations according to the learner’s profile within a virtual environment. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., 245–260 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sehaba, K., Hussaan, A.M.: Adaptive serious game for the re-education of cognitive disorders. AMSE J. Adv. Model. Ser. Model. C 3(73), 148–159 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 108(6), 2017 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodyear, P.: Teaching as design. HERDSA Rev. High. Educ., 27–50 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Agostinho, S., Beardsley, M., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L.: Helping teachers to think about their design problem: a pilot study to stimulate design thinking. In: 9th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies EDULEARN17, Barcelona, Spain (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L.: The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers design work. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65(1), 125–145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan, E., Könings, K.D.: Teachers as participatory designers: two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instr. Sci. 43(2), 203–228 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zeiss, B., Vega, D., Schieferdecker, I., Neukirchen, H., Grabowski, J.: Applying the ISO 9126 Quality Model to Test Specifications – Exemplified for TTCN-3 Test Specifications”, pp. 231–244 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trinh, T.-H., Querrec, R., De Loor, P., Chevaillier, P.: Ensuring semantic spatial constraints in virtual environments using UML/OCL. In: VRST ‘10 Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pp. 219–226. Hong-Kong, Nov. 22–24, 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, C.J., Toh, S.C., Fauzy, W.M.: The theoretical framework for designing desktop virtual reality-based learning environments. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 15(2), 147–167. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, C.J., Teh, C.S.: Enhancing an instructional design model for virtual reality-based learning. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 29(5), 699–716 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ritz, L.T.: Teaching with CAVE virtual reality systems: Instructional design strategies that promote adequate cognitive load for learners. SMTC Plan B Papers 5 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marion, N., Querrec, R., Chevaillier, P.: Integrating knowledge from virtual reality environments to learning scenario models-a meta-modeling approach. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Supported Education, PP. 254–259 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fahim, M., Jakimi, A., El Bermi, L.: Pedagogical Scenarization for Virtual Environments for Training: Towards Genericity, Coherence and Adaptivity. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 3(12), 96–103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buche, C., Querrec, R., De Loor, P., Chevaillier, P.: Mascaret: Pedagogical multi-agents system for virtual environment for training. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 4(2), 41–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Le Corre, F., Hoareau, C., Ganier, F., Buche, C., Querrec, R.: A pedagogical scenario language for virtual environment for learning based on UML meta-model. Application to Blood Analysis Instrument. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), pp. 301–308. Spain (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buche, C., Bossard, C., Querrec, R., Chevaillier, P.: PEGASE: A generic and adaptable intelligent system for virtual reality learning environments. Int. J. Virtual Real. 9(2), 73–85 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lanquepin, V., et al.: HUMANS: a human models based artificial environments software platform. In: VRIC 2013, Mar 13, Laval, France, pp. 59–68 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerbaud, S., Mollet, N., Ganier, F., Arnaldi B., Tisseau, J.: GVT: a platform to create virtual environments for. In: Virtual Reality Conference, Reno, NE, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    The process approach in iso 9001:2015, International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruzzu, G.: Blog VTS Editor authoring software for Degital Learning. Serious factory, 8 December 2017.
  24. 24.
    Oubahssi, L., Piau-Toffolon, C.: Virtual learning environment design in the context of orientation skills acquisition for LUSI class. In: CSEDU 2018, the International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, pp. 47–58 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Emin-Martinez, V., et al.: Towards teacher-led design inquiry of learning. eLearning Papers, no. 36, pp. 1–12 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tadjine, Z., Oubahssi, L., Piau-Toffolon, C., Iksal, S.: A process using ontology to automate the operationalization of pattern-based learning scenarios. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS), pp. 444–461. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mor, Y.: Embedding design patterns in a methodology for a design science of e-Learning. In: Kohls, C., Wedekind, J. (ed.) Problems Investigations of E-Learning Patterns: Context Factors Solutions (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fuchs, P., Moreau, G., Guitton, P.: Virtual Reality: Concepts and Technologies. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lahcen Oubahssi
    • 1
  • Oussema Mahdi
    • 1
  • Claudine Piau-Toffolon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sébastien Iksal
    • 1
  1. 1.Le Mans Université, LIUM, EA 4023Le Mans Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations