Advertisement

Study Effort and Student Success: A MOOC Case Study

  • Jeanette SamuelsenEmail author
  • Mohammad Khalil
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)

Abstract

Learning was once defined as the function of efforts spent in relation to efforts needed [3]. Provided that effort is closely linked to time, previous research has found a positive relationship between student effort over time and student success, both in university education and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). With the complex environment of tracing and identifying relevant data of student learning processes in MOOCs, this study employs learning analytics to examine this relationship for MITx 6.00x, an introductory programming and computer science MOOC hosted on the edX MOOC platform. A population sample from the MOOC (N = 32,621) was examined using logistic regression, controlling for variables that may also influence the outcome. Conversely, the outcome of this research study suggests that there is a curvilinear relationship between effort over time and student success, meaning those who exert effort for the longest amount of time in the MOOC actually have a lower probability of obtaining a certificate than others who exert effort over somewhat less time. Finally, research implications are discussed.

Keywords

Massive open online course (MOOC) Efforts Learning analytics Logistic regression Total time Study success 

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, R.S., Inventado, P.S.: Educational data mining and learning analytics. In: Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, pp. 61–75. Springer, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman, N.A., Hill, P.L., Denson, N., Bronkema, R.: Keep on truckin’or stay the course? Exploring grit dimensions as differential predictors of educational achievement, satisfaction, and intentions. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 6(6), 639–645 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll, J.: A model of school learning. Teach. Coll. Rec. 64(8), 723–733 (1963)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 185–189 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cross, T.M.: The gritty: grit and non-traditional doctoral student success. J. Educ. Online 11(3), 1–30 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dweck, C.S.: The secret to raising smart kids. Sci. Am. Mind 18(6), 36–43 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Field, A.P., Miles, J., Field, Z.: Discovering Statistics Using R. Sage, London (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E.D., Sujitparapitaya, S.: Case study: using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Educ. 35(2), 178–201 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: the effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ. 28, 68–84 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gurria, A.: PISA 2015 results in focus. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf (2018)
  11. 11.
    Hill, C., Corbett, C., St. Rose, A.: Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women (AAUW) (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention-a literature review. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1305–1313 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: What massive open online course (MOOC) stakeholders can learn from learning analytics? In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, pp. 1–30. Springer, Heildelberg (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_3-1
  14. 14.
    Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Modeling Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 60–65 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuh, G.D., Cruce, T.M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R.M.: Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. J. High. Educ. 79(5), 540–563 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lackner, E., Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: How to foster forum discussions within MOOCs: a case study. Int. J. Acad. Res. Educ. 2(2) (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., Cormier, D.: The MOOC Model for Digital Practice (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mehmetoglu, M., Jakobsen, T.G.: Applied Statistics Using Stata: A Guide for the Social Sciences. Sage (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    MITx, HarvardX: HarvardX-MITx Person-Course Academic Year 2013 De-Identified dataset, version 2.0. Harvard Dataverse (2014).  https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26147
  20. 20.
    Reeve, J.: Understanding Motivation and Emotion, 6th edn. Wiley (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reich, J., Emanuel, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., …, Ho, A.D.: HeroesX: The Ancient Greek Hero: Spring 2013 Course Report (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seaton, D.T., Reich, J., Nesterko, S.O., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., Ho, A.D., Chuang, I.: 6.00 x Introduction to Computer Science and Programming MITx on edX Course Report - 2012 Fall (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strayhorn, T.L.: What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? J. Afr. Am. Stud. 18(1), 1–10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, G., Anderson, T.J., Ohland, M.W., Thorndyke, B.R.: Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: a longitudinal and cross-institutional study. J. Eng. Educ. 93(4), 313–320 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilkowski, J., Deutsch, A., Russell, D.M.: Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp. 3–10 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations