Advertisement

Designing Online Environment for Collaborative Learning in a Scientific Community of Practice

  • Joanna JesionkowskaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)

Abstract

The motivation for this research was to find a way to sustain the collaboration between scientists engaged in a training program. The collaborationstarted face to face, but it is envisaged that the training program and the trainers’ community will transform to an online format. According to the needs criteria can be proposed to design an online space, that would answer the needs of the members of the community to sustain the process of collaborative learning. Data was gathered from content analysis, observations, interviews, focus groups and online surveys with community coordinators and community members. The model of the community was developed which led to a set of recommendations for an online community of practice. Developing an online community of practice between the members of the community could be an answer to their learning needs and could improve the culture of knowledge sharing and collaboration.

Keywords

Collaborative learning Situated learning Community of practice Metrology in chemistry Online community 

References

  1. 1.
    Sonnenwald, D.H.: Scientific collaboration. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 41, 643–680 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsh, J.P., Maloney, N.G.: Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooke N.J., Hilton M.L.: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington DC, US (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canals, A., Ortoll, E., Nordberg, M.: Collaboration networks in big science: the ATLAS experiment at CERN. El Profesional de la Información 26(5), 961–971 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    González-Alcaide, G., Gómez-Ferri, J.: The tenets of scientific collaboration: rules and recommendations. Curr. Sci. (00113891) 113(8), 1505–1506 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keck, A.-S., Sloane, S., Liechty, J.M., Fiese, B.H., Donovan, S.M.: Productivity, impact, and collaboration differences between transdisciplinary and traditionally trained doctoral students: a comparison of publication patterns. PLoS ONE 12(12), e0189391 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jirotka, M., Lee, C.P., Olson, G.M.: Comput. Support. Coop. Work 22, 667 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mindeli, L., Markusova, V.: Bibliometric studies of scientific collaboration: international trends. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 49(2), 59–64 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, É.: 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. In: Proceedings EC-TEL 2015, Toledo, Spain (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ashwin, P.: Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: accounting for structure and agency. Br. Educ. Res. J. 36(1), 171–172. ISSN 0141-1926 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan S., Suter. V.: Community of Practice Design Guide, A Step-by-Step Guide for Designing & Cultivating Communities of Practice in Higher Education. Darren Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., Wenger-Trayner, E.: Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: a conversation with Etienne Wenger. Br. J. Educ. Stud. 1–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wenger-Trayner, E., Wenger-Trayner, B.: Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning, pp. 13–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Knowledge building. In: Guthrie, J.W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd edn. Macmillan Reference, New York, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mikhaylov, N., Fierro, I., Beaumont E.: The influences of capital development strategies choice on international management students’ collaborative knowledge creation. In: INTED2016 Proceedings, Turkey and Ecuador, pp. 7682–7691 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collins, H.M.: The meaning of data: open and closed evidential cultures in the search for gravitational waves. Am. J. Sociol. 104(2), 293–338 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kienle, A., Wessner, M.: Principles for cultivating scientific communities of practice. In: Van Den Besselaar, P., De Michelis, G., Preece, J., Simone, C. (eds.) Communities and Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Cooney, D., Olson, J.S., Dahl, E., Yerkie, J.: From shared databases to communities of practice: a taxonomy of collaboratories. In: Olson, G.M., Zimmerman, A., Bos, N. (eds.) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muff, K.: The Collaboratory: A Co-Creative Stakeholder Engagement Process for Solving Complex Problems. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maglaughlin, K.L., Sonnenwald, D.H.: Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. In: Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B. (eds.) Proceedings of ISSI 2005, pp. 499–508. Karolinska University Press, Stockholm (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solomon, N., Boud, D., Leontios, M., Staron, M.: Researchers are learners too: Collaboration in research on workplace learning. J. Work. Learn. 13(7/8), 274–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lambert, R.: Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, Final Report (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davenport, T.H.: Process management for knowledge work. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Du, J., Ge, X., Xu, J.: Online collaborative learning activities: the perspectives of African American female students. Comput. Educ. 82, 152–161 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liao, Y., Huang, Y., Chen, H., Huang, S.: Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43(11), 313 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Booth, S.E., Kellogg, S.B.: Value creation in online communities for educators (Report). Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(4), 684 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cranefield, J., Yoong, P., Huff, S.: Rethinking lurking: invisible leading and following in a knowledge transfer ecosystem. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(4), 213–247 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hearn, S., White, N.: Communities of practice: Linking knowledge, policy and practice. ODI Background Note (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LiegeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations