Advertisement

Planning the Combination of “Big Data Insights” and “Thick Descriptions” to Support the Decision-Making Process

  • Diana Arce CuestaEmail author
  • Marcos Borges
  • Jose Orlando Gomes
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)

Abstract

Practitioners and researchers have emphasized the importance of combining “Big Data insights” and “Thick descriptions” to support the decision-making process. However, organizations face challenges in the combination of these approaches. This paper suggests a guideline is necessary to provide clarity to the dynamics between “Big Data insights” and “Thick descriptions”. Thus, this paper presents a four steps conceptual Framework to support in the planning stage of “Big Data insights” and “Thick descriptions” combination. This Framework is composed of paradigms which provide ways to ponder the appropriateness of each approach. From the literature review, paradigms detailed in four informative tables were developed. A study case in education management illustrates the Framework application. Results have shown the Framework potential to support the planning of the combination of “Big Data insights” and “Thick descriptions” combination in educational management.

Keywords

Big Data insights Thick descriptions Framework Paradigms 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by CAPES – Brazilian Federal Agency.

References

  1. 1.
    Labrinidis, A., Jagadish, H.: Challenges and opportunities with big data. In: VLDB Endowment, vol. 5, no. 12. Istanbul Turkey (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ylijoki, O., Porras, J.: Perspectives to definition of big data: a mapping study and discussion. J. Innov. Manag. 4, 69–91 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 662–679 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blok, A., Pedersen, M.A.: Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data Soc. 1 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714543908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, R.M., Kauffman, R.J., Kwon, Y.: Understanding the paradigm shift to computational social science in the presence of big data. Decis. Support Syst. 63, 67–80 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowls, J., Schroeder, R.: Causation, correlation, and big data in social science research. Policy Internet 7, 447–472 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felt, M.: Social media and the social sciences: how researchers employ Big Data analytics. Big Data Soc. 3 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716645828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, R.: Missed miracles and mystical connections: qualitative research, digital social science and big data. In: Big Data? Qualitative Approaches to Digital Research, pp. 181–204 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swan, M.: Philosophy of big data: expanding the human-data relation with big data science services. In: Big Data Service, pp. 468–477 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geertz, C.: Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (1973)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomes, L.: Snapshot of big data trends in Latin America - The Bridge, Revista da National Academy of Engineering (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fields, D.A., Quirke, L., Amely, J., Maughan, J.: Combining big data and thick data analyses for understanding youth learning trajectories in a summer coding camp. In: SIGCSE Proceedings. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ford, H.: Big data and small: collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data Soc. 1 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laaksonen, S., Nelimarkka, M., Tuokko, M., Marttila, M., Kekkonen, A., Villi, M.: Working the field of Big Data: using Big Data augmented online ethnography to study candidate-candidate interaction at election time. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 14(2), 110–131 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgan, D.L.: Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1, 48–76 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laney, D.: 3D data management: controlling data volume, velocity, and variety. META Group Res. NOTE 6, 70 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schroeck, M., Shockley, R., Smart, J., Romero, D., Tufano, P.: Analytics: the real-world use of big data. Executive report. IBM Global Business Services, IBM, Somers (2012Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Croft, C.: The limits of big data. SAIS Rev. Int. Aff. 34, 117–120 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rasmussen, M.B., Madsbjerg, C.: Big data gets the algorithms right but the people wrong (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ackermann, K., Angus, S.D.: A resource-efficient big data analysis method for the social sciences: the case of global IP activity. Procedia Comput. 29, 2360–2369 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, T.: Why Big Data Needs Thick Data. Medium (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Myers, M.: Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. Commun. AIS 2 (1999). Article 23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kitchin, R.: Big Data, new epistemologies, and paradigm shifts. Big Data Soc. 1 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leavitt, A.: Human-centered data science: mixed methods and intersecting evidence, inference, and scalability. In: HCDS Workshop. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Creswell, J.W.: A Concise Introduction To Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson, R.B., Christensen, L.B.: Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lichtman, M.: Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide. Sage Publications Inc., Los Angeles (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 37, 21–54 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A., Creswell, J.W.: Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Serv. Res. 48, 2134–2156 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hanson, W., Creswell, J., Clark, V., Petska, K., Creswell, J.: Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. J. Couns. Psychol. 52, 224 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hesse-Biber, N.: Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. Guilford Press, London (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kerschberg, B.: How xerox uses analytics, big data, and ethnography to help government solve big problems (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nash, K.: Wells Fargo Revamps Website after Ethno-Analytics Study. https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2015/11/10/wells-fargo-revamps-website-after-ethno-analytics-study/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Arce Cuesta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcos Borges
    • 1
  • Jose Orlando Gomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program on Informatics (PPGI), Institute of Mathematics (IM)Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Rio de Janeiro - RJBrazil

Personalised recommendations