Advertisement

Alzheimer Detection Based on Multi-Agent Systems: An Intelligent Image Processing Environment

  • Hanane AlliouiEmail author
  • Mohamed Sadgal
  • Aziz El Faziki
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 914)

Abstract

Nowadays, robust image processing and intelligent systems have gained much popularity and importance in several fields o studies; Consequently, the use of Multi-agent systems (MAS) has been adopted as a strength paradigm for analyzing images. Since, medical image segmentation faces multiple obstacles, the use of MAS has proved precious benefits to accomplish many tasks such as quantification of tissue volumes, medical diagnosis, anatomical structure studies, treatment planning, etc. Currently, diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (AD) can be made by different methods, neuroimaging assessments are the most used one. Meanwhile, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers well-defined measurement of brain structures, it has been considered as one of the best neuroimaging examination for AD. For this reason, MAS adopt the decentralization of knowledge and behavior in order to provide a powerful resolution of segmentation issues. We briefly describe a framework for Agent Based modeling (ABM) which is designed to 3D image processing especially Alzheimer MRI analysis, and highlights its important characteristics: agent behavior, perception, interactions, cooperation, and negotiation.

Keywords

Agent Based Modeling Multi agent systems Image analysis 3D image processing Segmentation Cooperation Negotiation Neuroimaging Alzheimer Neurodegenerative diseases 

References

  1. 1.
    Fan, Y., Wu, X., Shen, D., Resnick, S.M., Davatzikos, C.: Yong, detection of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease via pattern classification of MRI. Neurobiol. Aging 29(4), 514–523 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braak, H., Braak, E., Bohl, J., Bratzke, H.: Evolution of Alzheimer’s disease related cortical lesions. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 54, 97–106 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khan, M., Ravi, S.: Image segmentation methods: a comparative study. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. (IJSCE) 3(4), 84–92 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Padmavathi, G., Subashini, P., Sumi, A.: Empirical evaluation of suitable segmentation algorithms for ir images. IJCSI Int. J. Comput. Sci. 7(4), 22 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Agent theories, architectures, and languages: a survey. In: ECAI 1994: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Theories Architectures, and Languages on Intelligent Agents, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1–22 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns, A., Iliffe, S.: Alzheimer’s disease. BMJ 338, b158 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b158. PMID 19196745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Satel, S., Lilienfeld, S.O.: Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. Basic Books, New York (2015). ISBN-13 978-0465062911Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh, V., Misra, A.K.: Detection of plant leaf diseases using image segmentation and soft computing techniques. Inf. Process. Agric. 4(1), 41–49 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Machairas, V., Baldeweck, T., Walter, T., Decencière, E.: New general features based on superpixels for image segmentation learning. In: 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493531
  10. 10.
    Batenburg, K.J., Sijbers, J.: Optimal threshold selection for tomogram segmentation by projection distance minimization. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 676–686 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2008.2010437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhanachandra, N., Manglem, K., Chanu, Y.J.: Image segmentation using k-means clustering algorithm and subtractive clustering algorithm. In: Eleventh International Multi-Conference on Information Processing (IMCIP 2015). Procedia Computer Science, vol. 54, pp. 764–771 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zucker, S.W.: Region growing: childhood and adolescence. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 5(3), 382–399 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wei, C.H., Chen, S.Y., Liu, X.: Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 106(3), 234–248 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rouhi, R., Jafari, M., Kasaei, S., Keshavarzian, P.: Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and CNN. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 990–1002 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niu, S., Chen, Q., de Sisternes, L., Ji, Z., Zhou, Z., Rubin, D.L.: Robust noise region-based active contour model via local similarity factor for image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. 61, 104–119 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qian, Y., Gao, X., Loomes, M., Comley, R., Barn, B., Hui, R., Tian, Z.: Content based retrieval of 3D medical images. In: eTELEMED 2011: The Third International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (2011). ISBN 978-1-61208-003-1Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strzelecki, M., Lee, M.: Analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance human liver images. IETE J. Res. 57(3), 237–245 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Airan, R.D., Foss, C.A., Ellens, N.P., Wang, Y., Mease, R.C., Farahani, K., Pomper, M.G.: MR-Guided delivery of hydrophilic molecular imaging agents across the blood-brain barrier through focused ultrasound. Mol. Imaging Biol. 19(1), 24–30 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henriet, J., Lang, C.: Introduction of a multiagent paradigm to optimize a case-based reasoning system designed to personalize three-dimensional numerical representations of human organs. Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Commun. 26(5), 1450060 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pitiot, A., Delingette, H., Thompson, P.M., Ayache, N.: Expert knowledge-guided segmentation system for brain MRI. NeuroImage 23, S85–S96 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shattuck, D.W., Mirza, M., Adisetiyo, V., Hojatkashani, C., Salamon, G., Narr, K.L., Poldrack, R.A., Bilder, R.M., Toga, A.W.: Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage 39, 1064–1080 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coelhoa, V.N., Cohen, M.W., Guimaraes, F.G., Coelho, I.M., Liu, N.: Multi-agent systems applied for energy systems integration: state-of-the-art applications and trends in microgrids. Appl. Energy 187, 820–832 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yokoo, M.: Algorithms for distributed constraint satisfaction problems: with review. Auton. Agents Syst. Multi-Agent 3, 198–212 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Center, The National Alzheimer’s Coordinating. https://www.alz.washington.edu
  26. 26.
    Liu, L., Zhou, L.-L., Bao, H.-F.: Remote sensing image segmentation algorithm based on multi-agent and fuzzy clustering. In: 2017 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Energy Engineering (ICESEE 2017) (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanane Allioui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohamed Sadgal
    • 1
  • Aziz El Faziki
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences SemlaliaCadi Ayyad UniversityMarrakechMorocco

Personalised recommendations