Advertisement

Toward a Study of Environmental Impact of the Tangier Med Port Container Terminals

  • Fatima Ezzahra SakhiEmail author
  • Abdelmoula Ait Allal
  • Khalifa Mansouri
  • Mohammed Qbadou
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 913)

Abstract

The containerized cargo segment has continued its improvement during the last decades. This improvement has motivated the maritime stakeholders to invest in container terminal projects to boost their economies and to ensure the prosperity of their countries. However, the container terminal activity has a significant environmental impact on air, ocean, workers, and the surrounding population. The port of Tangier Med as one of the worldwide container terminal hubs does not make the exception in term of environmental impact. In this paper, the environmental impact of this port is quantified in term of greenhouse gases emission and pollutant particles. Innovative operational and technical solutions have been proposed to attenuate this impact and to make of it an environment friendly port.

Keywords

Environment Port Ship Green energy Rubber fragments GHG emission 

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD); Review of maritime transport 2017; UNCTAD/RMT/2017, United Nations Publication (2017). ISSN 0566-7682Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winnes, H., Styhre, L., Fridell, E.: Reducing GHG emissions from ships in port areas. J. Res. Transp. Bus. Manage. 17, 73–82 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindstad, H., Eskeland, G.S., Psaraftis, H., Sandaas, I., Strømman, A.H.: Maritime shipping and emissions: a three-layered, damage-based approach. Ocean Eng. 110, 94–101 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zetterdahl, M., Moldanova, J., Pei, X., Pathak, R.K., Demirdjian, B.: Impact of the 0.1% fuel sulfur content limit in SECA on particle and gaseous emissions from marine vessels. J. Atmos. Environ. 145, 338–345 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bailey, D., Solomon, G.: Pollution prevention at ports: clearing the air. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 24, 749–774 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naciri, M., Aggour, M., Ait Ahmed, W.: Wind energy storage by pumped hydro station. J. Energy Syst. 1, 32 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Organisation météorologique mondiale, OMM-N° 1167 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jean-Claude, K., Pierre-André, H.: The consequences of an increase of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, a global survey of our current state of knowledge, World engineer’s convention (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    La Ministre de l’ecologie et du developpment durable (France). Official Journal of 6 December 2005, NOR:DEVP0540388A. http://www.bulletin-officiel.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/fiches/exboenvireco/200601/A0010017.htm
  10. 10.
    Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP). The atmospheric input of chemicals to the ocean, GSAMP reports and studies No. 84 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gouvernement du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg, Effects of SO2 on health and the environment (2017). www.environnement.public.lu/fr/loft/air/Polluants_atmospheriques/les_oxydes_de_soufre_SOx/effets-SO2.html
  12. 12.
    Fédération francaise de l’acier, Guide méthodologique pour l’évaluation des émissions dans l’air des installations de production et de transformation de l’acier, Version 5, Décembre 2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buchet, E., Dubeau, B., Guerin, A.: Study of the energy impact and emissions of the ports and airports of the PACA region (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner, A., Rice, L.: Toxicity of tire wear particle leachate to the marine macroalga, Ulva Lactuca. J. Environ. Pollut. 158, 3650–3654 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wik, A., Dave, G.: Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment – a critical review and an initial risk assessment. J. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thirion, J.M., Doré, F., Sériot, J.: Impact de la pollution sonore sur la faune. J. Le courrier de la nature 254, 32–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanger Med port complex, Activity – 2017 activity report (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, Y.-C., Chang, W.-M.: Impacts of electric rubber-tired gantries on green port performance (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ait Allal, A., Mansouri, K., Youssfi, M., Qbadou, M.: Toward a study of ocean pollution by maritime industry and proposal of innovative ideas to reduce its impact. In: Virtual Conference on Advanced Research in Materials and Environmental Science, 10 January 2018Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ait Allal, A., Mansouri, K., Youssfi, M., Qbadou, M.: Toward energy saving and environmental protection by implementation of autonomous ship. In: 19th IEEE Mediterranean Electronical Conference, IEEE MELECON 2018, 2nd–4th May 2018, Marrakech Morocco (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    DNVGL. The ReVolt new inspirational concept (2017). https://www.dnvgl.com/technology-innovation/revolt/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatima Ezzahra Sakhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdelmoula Ait Allal
    • 1
  • Khalifa Mansouri
    • 1
  • Mohammed Qbadou
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory: Signals, Distributed Systems and Artificial Intelligence (SSDIA) ENSET MohammediaUniversity Hassan IICasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations