Advertisement

CSR Ratings and Contradiction of Real and Communicated Aims of Media Organization: The Case of News Corporation

  • Jan KreftEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/1)

Abstract

The article aims at the critical analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) ratings in accordance with reports presented by the largest organization which evaluates corporate social responsibility—the CSRHUB. The analysis refers to media corporations, such as News Corporations, and it aims at providing an answer to the question how the crisis of social trust towards media which belong to a media corporation affects their CSR ratings. In the article, there have been two hypotheses formulated: (1) the complex character of social, political and market aims pursued by media corporations is not clearly reflected by CSR ratings; (2) the comprehensiveness of CSR ratings does not contribute to the identification of key threats which result from the lack of social responsibility in a media corporation. The analysis indicates that—in their scope which is difficult to verify—CSR ratings of media corporations take into consideration the following elements: media specificity, and lobbying nature of some organizations (e.g. News Corporation). Their complexity and aggregated character makes it difficult to identify the sources of the problem. Furthermore, image disasters of particular entities within corporations insignificantly affect their CSR ratings.

Keywords

CSR Media corporation News Corporation 

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arsenault, A. H., & Castells, M. (2008). The structure and dynamics of global multi-media business networks. International Journal of Communication, 2, 707–748.Google Scholar
  3. Batko, R., & Kreft, J. (2017). The superfluousness of CSR in media organizations: Conclusions from public radio research in Poland. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(1), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. (1976). Social impact disclosure and corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, M., & Berkowitz, D. (2014). ‘The emperor lost his clothes’: Rupert Murdoch, News of the World and journalistic boundary work in the UK and USA. Journalism, 15(4), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chittum, R. (2011). Rupert Murdoch and the corporate culture of News Corp. Columbia Journalism Review [online]. Accessed January 12, 2017, from http://fortune.com/2011/07/19/the-trembling-at-news-corp-has-only-begun/0
  11. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CSRHUB LLC. (2010, December 8). CSRHUB joins the ranks of responsible businesses as a certified B Corporation. CSRwire [online]. Accessed January 12, 2017, from http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/31262-CSRHUB-Joins-the-Ranks-of-Responsible-Businesses-as-a-Certified-B-Corporation
  13. CSRHUB LLC. (2017). CSRHub schema description [online]. Accessed January 16, 2017, from http://www.csrhub.com/content/csrhub-data-schema
  14. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eells, R. S. F. (1960). The meaning of modern business. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Flew, T., & Gilmour, C. J. (2003). A tale of two synergies: An institutional analysis of the expansionary strategies of News Corporation and AOL-Time Warner. Managing Communication for Diversity, Australia and New Zealand Communications Association Conference, Brisbane, 9–11 July 2003Google Scholar
  18. Grayson, D. (2010). Corporate responsibility and the media. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 5(3), 160–193.Google Scholar
  19. Gulyás, Á. (2011). Demons into angels? Corporate social responsibility and media organizations. Critical Survey, 23(2), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han, E.-K., Lee, D.-H., & Khang, H. (2008). Influential factors of the social responsibility of newspaper corporations in South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendriques, A. (2011). Corporate truth: The limits to transparency. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  22. Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, M. (2012). Media governance and corporate social responsibility of media organizations: An international comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(2), 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2010). Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: A study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kesavan, R., Bernacchi, M. D., & Mascarenhas, O. A. (2013). Word of mouse: CSR communication and the social media. International Management Review, 9(1), 59–67.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, S. Y., & Carroll, C. E. (2011). The emergence, variation, and evolution of corporate social responsibility in the public sphere, 1980–2004: The exposure of firms to public debate. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Louw, E. (2001). The media and cultural production. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maak, T. (2008). Undivided corporate responsibility: Towards a theory of corporate integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marjoribanks, T. (2000). News corporation, technology and the workplace: Global strategies, local change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. News Corporation. (2007). Annual Report 2007 [online]. Accessed January 12, 2017, from http://www.annualreports.com/Company/news-corporation
  35. Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? The European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pellicano, M., Vesci, M., Troisi, O., Cosimato, S., & Tuccillo, C. (2014). Stakeholder engagement for sustainable development in banking industry. An Italian case study (pp. 1–17). 13th EBES Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  39. Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sandoval, M. (2013). Corporate social (ir)responsibility in media and communication industries. Javnost-The Public, 20(3), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sandoval, M. (2014). From corporate to social media: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in media and communication industries. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schejter, A. M., & Davidson, R. (2008). “... and money is answer for all things”: The News Corp.–Dow Jones Merger and the Separation of Editorial and Business Practices. International Journal of Communication, 2, 515–542.Google Scholar
  43. Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson, J. B. (2013). Merchants of culture: The publishing business in the twenty-first century. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Toffel, M., & Schendler, A. (2012). Where green corporate ratings fail [online]. Accessed January 9, 2017, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6906.html
  46. Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and Social CommunicationJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations