Fuzzy Modeling of Customized Solutions for Corporate Performance Assessment

  • Marius PîslaruEmail author
  • Silvia Avasilcăi
  • Lidia Elena Alexa
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/1)


The social environment in which corporations operate is affected by their actions but equally corporations experience the pressures of society. The idea that the economic environment is currently in a transition phase from the knowledge-based economy and society to the innovation economy and society is strongly emphasized by the policy makers and experts’ publications and reports underlining the pressure the companies are under in order to adjust to the environmental and economic changes and to become more competitive. The paper aims to develop and test, in a textile company from Iasi, a performance assessment model based on fuzzy modelling techniques. In order to assess corporate performance Balanced Scorecard approach was considered based on fuzzy technique. The corporate performance using lagging and leading indicators suggests that business performance should be evaluated not only by using financial indicators but also by simultaneously considering non-financial indicators. This way, it is possible to evaluate the business performance from a strategic perspective, taking into account not only past results but also leading indicators. The fuzzy it is suitable for industrial firms to monitor the performance indicators that can contribute to a sustainable competitive position.


Corporate performance assessment Fuzzy modeling Expert system design Decision making 



This research was undertaken within the framework of the National Research Program PN II, financed by MEN – UEFISCDI, project PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-1811.


  1. Avram, E., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Business performance measurement in relation to corporate social responsibility: A conceptual model development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1142–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boj, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2014). An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to link intangible assets and organizational performance in a Balanced Scorecard context. Decision Support Systems, 68, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ihsan, Y., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for balanced scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1270–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79.Google Scholar
  6. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006a). Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: HBS Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006b). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review, March, 100–109.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., & Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leon-Soriano, R., Munoz-Torez, M. J., & Chalmeta-Rosalen, R. (2010). Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leung, L. C., Lam, K. C., & Cao, D. (2006). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 682–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lynch, R., & Cross, K. (1995). Measure up! Yardsticks for continuous improvement. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Neely, A. (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillis, Y. A., & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. (2001). Sustainability: An ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecological Economics, 37, 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phillis, Y. A., & Davis, B. J. (2008). Assessment of corporate sustainability via fuzzy logic. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 55, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Phillis, Y. A., & Kouikoglou, V. S. (2009). Fuzzy measurement of sustainability. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  17. Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7316–7327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silk, S. (1998). Automating the balanced scorecard. Management Accountant, 79(11), 38–40.Google Scholar
  19. Sohn, M. H., You, T., Lee, S.-L., & Lee, H. (2003). Corporate strategies, environmental forces, and performance measures: A weighting decision support system using the K-nearest neighbor technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 25, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sorooshian, S., Aziz, N. F., Ahmad, A., Jubidin, S. N., & Mustapha, N. M. (2016). Review on performance measurement systems. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 123–132.Google Scholar
  21. Sveiby, K. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  22. Tseng, M. L. (2010). Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard. Computers in Education, 55(1), 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Westbrook, R., Kumar, P., & Epstein, M. (2000). The drivers of customer and corporate profitability: Modeling, measuring and managing the causal relationships. Advances in Management Accounting, 9, 43–72.Google Scholar
  24. Yuan, F. C., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). A hierarchical design of case-based reasoning in the balanced scorecard application. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270–1278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marius Pîslaru
    • 1
    Email author
  • Silvia Avasilcăi
    • 1
  • Lidia Elena Alexa
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering and Management Department“Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of IasiIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations