Advertisement

Explanations of the Feminization Effects in HR Profession and Beyond

  • Zsuzsa Karoliny
  • Norbert SiposEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/1)

Abstract

In this paper we aim to find out whether there is an empirical evidence of the queuing and the devaluation theory. Based on one cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies using Cranet Human Resource Management network data we redefine the indicators of Human Resource strategic integration. The paper investigates the characteristics of feminization and Human Resource integration in four regions of the world in two consecutive Cranet surveys (2008/10 and 2014/16); also extends this focus on the Hungarian marketing, Human Resources, and finance recent graduates based on Graduate Career Tracking System database 2011–2014. Our empirical findings add new aspects of gender-effect on the strategic role of Human Resource Management in four regions of the world, further weaken the explanatory power of the two theories. We can conclude our study with a positive statement: the glass ceiling seems to break in the Human Resources, and based on the Graduate Career Tracking System data, sticky floors no more characterize the gender differences in earnings. Human Resources profession seems fully feminized, marketing on its way, but finance succeeds to preserve still its positive characteristics for men.

Keywords

Human Resources Feminization Effect Cranet Network Graduate Career Tracking System 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the únkp-16-3 new national excellence program of the ministry of human capacities.

References

  1. Baron, J. N., & Bielby, W. T. (1985). Organizational barriers to gender equality: Sex segregation of jobs and opportunities. In A. Rossi (Ed.), Gender and the life course (pp. 233–251). New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. Q., & Walton, R. (1984). Managing human assets. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brewster, C., Wood, G., Brooks, M., & Van Ommeren, J. V. (2006). What determines the size of the HR function? A cross-national analysis. Human Resource Management, 45(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diez, D. M., Barr, C. D., & Cetinkaya-Rundel, M. (2017). OpenIntro statistics (3rd ed.). OpenIntro. Retrieved 04 March 2018.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. (2003). Korszerű munkagazdaságtan. Elmélet és közpolitika (Modern labour economics. Theory and public policy). Budapest: Panem Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
  6. Fernandez, R. M., & Mors, M. L. (2008). Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1061–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2004). Managing human resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman, J., Fields, D., & Bulum, T. (2003). Cracks in the glass ceiling: In what kinds of organizations do women make it to the top? Group and Organization Management, 28, 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardin, E. (1991). The integration of women into professional personnel and labour relations work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(2), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karoliny, M., Bálint, B., & Galambosné Tiszberger, M. (2015). Contradicting gender-effects on strategic role of HRM in four regions of the world. Strategic Management: International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support System in Strategic Management, 20(3), 25–36.Google Scholar
  12. Kee, H. J. (2006). Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Exploring the Australian gender pay gap. Economic Record, 82, 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lazarova, M., Mayrhofer, W., & Brewster, C. (2013). ‘Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose’: A longitudinal analysis of HRM work and the profile of senior HR managers. In E. Parry, E. Stavrou, & M. Lazarova (Eds.), Global trends in human resource management (pp. 11–34). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, R. (1988). Social closure: The theory of monopolization and exclusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Perales, F. (2010). Occupational feminization, specialized human capital and wages: Evidence from the British Labour Market. ISER working paper series. University of Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1987). The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pichler, S., Simpson, P. A., & Stroh, L. K. (2008). The glass ceiling in human resources: Exploring the link between women’s representation in management and the practices of strategic human resource management and employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47(3), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reichel, A., Brandl, J., & Mayrhofer, W. (2013). New captain but a sinking ship? The influence of HR director’s gender on the status of the HR department – A longitudinal study. In E. Parry, E. Stavrou, & M. Lazarova (Eds.), Global trends in human resource management (pp. 33–53). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Reskin, B. (1993). Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reskin, B., & Roos, P. (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Roos, P. A., & Manley, J. E. (1996). Staffing personnel: Feminization and change in human resource management. Sociological Focus, 39(3), 246–261.Google Scholar
  22. Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (2007). Strategic human resource management. London: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  23. Steinberg, R. J. (2001). Comparable worth in gender studies. In International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 2393–2397). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Truss, C., Gratton, L., Hope-Hailey, V., Stiles, P., & Zaleska, J. (2002). Paying the piper: Choice and constrains in changing HR functional roles. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Younger, J., Nyman, M., & Allen, J. (2009). HR transformation: Building human resources from the outside in. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Leadership and Organizational SciencesUniversity of PécsPécsHungary

Personalised recommendations