Ecosystems Services Economic Valuation Model: Case Study in Latvia

  • Irina ArhipovaEmail author
  • Elina Konstantinova
  • Nameda Belmane
  • Gatis Kristaps
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/2)


The aim of the paper is to present and discuss the model for ecosystem economic (monetary) valuation for the territory socio-economic development planning in two Latvian administrative areas: Baltic Sea coastal Saulkrasti and Jaunkemeri pilot areas. Using ecosystem services economic valuation model three scenarios have been modelled: current situation, planned development and uncontrolled development, when in two pilot areas about 50% increase in construction and 50% decrease of the forest area is foreseen. After analyzing the ecosystem services’ monetary values, it is concluded that the greatest monetary value in both areas are provided by regulating services, so the maintenance and protection of ecosystems ensuring regulating services can be considered as a priority in both pilot areas. The second priority is cultural services, assuming, that the use of cultural services will not generate additional anthropogenic load. The lowest priority is given to provisioning services, taking into account the fact that the real possibilities to obtain the market values are limited, because tree felling is prohibited.


Monetary valuation Land-use planning Sustainable management 



The study underlying this manuscript has been conducted within LIFE “EcosystemServices” (LIFE13 ENV/LV/000839) project, co-financed by European Union.


  1. Alcamo, J., Ash, N. J., Butler, C. D., Callicot, J. B., Capistrano, D., & Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, J., Jimenez, J. A., Sarda, R., & Garola, A. (2010). An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean and Coastal Management, 53, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camacho-Valdez, V., Ruiz-Luna, A., Ghermandi, A., & Nunes, P. (2013). Valuation of ecosystem services provided by coastal wetlands in Northwest Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management, 78, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza, R., De Groot, R., Sutton, P., Der Ploeg, S. V., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environment Change, 26, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Groot, R., Brander, L., Der Ploeg, S. V., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., Mcvittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L. C., & Van Beukering, P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Groot, R., Kumar, P., Der Ploeg, S. V., & Sukhdev, P. (2011). Estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services. In The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and economic foundations (pp. 1–35). Liverpool: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).Google Scholar
  7. Drakou, E. G., Crossman, N. D., Willemen, L., Burkhard, B., Palomo, I., & Maes, J. (2015). A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward. Ecosystem Services, 13, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs, S., Burkhard, B., Daele, T. V., Staes, J., & Schneiders, A. (2015). “The Matrix Reloaded”: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kettunen, M., Vihervaara, P., Kinnunen, S., D’Amato, D., Badura, T., Argimon, M., & Ten Brink, P. (2012). Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic countries. In Synthesis in the context of the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  10. Klein, T. M., Celio, E., & Gret-Regamey, A. (2015). Ecosystem services visualization and communication: A demand analysis approach for designing information and conceptualizing decision support systems. Ecosystem Services, 13, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marre, J. B., Thebaud, O., Pascoe, S., Jennings, S., Boncoeur, J., & Coglan, L. (2015). The use of ecosystem services valuation in Australian coastal zone management. Marine Policy, 56, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Notte, A. L., Maes, J., Bouraoui, F., & Masi, F. (2012). Biophysical assessment and monetary valuation of ecosystem services. Scenario analysis for the case of water purification in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.Google Scholar
  13. Ostberg, K., Hasselstrom, L., & Hakansson, C. (2015). Non-market valuation of the coastal environment – Uniting political aims, ecological and economic knowledge. Journal of Environmental Management, 110(2012), 166–178.Google Scholar
  14. Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Martin-Lopez, B., Verma, M., Armsworth, P., Christie, M., Cornelissen, H., Eppink, F., Farley, J., Pearson, L., Perrings, C., Polasky, S., Mcneely, J., Norgaard, R., Siddiqui, R., Simpson, R. D., Turner, R. K., & Simpson, R. D. (2011). The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. In The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Ecological and economic foundations (p. 133). Liverpool: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB).Google Scholar
  15. Pelorosso, R., Gobattoni, F., Geri, F., & Leone, A. (2016). Evaluation of ecosystem services related to bio-energy landscape connectivity (BELC) for land use decision making across different planning scales. Ecological Indicators, 61, 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Price, R. (Ed.). (2007). An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Sharma, B., Rasul, G., & Chettri, N. (2015). The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: Evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 12, 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trzaski, L., & Mana, V. (2008). Monetary value assessment of biotopes in the Bobrek river valley, Sosnowiec – A methodology proposal for Poland. Research Reports Mining and Environment, 3, 79–90.Google Scholar
  19. Van Der Ploeg, S., De Groot, D., & Wang, Y. (2010). The TEEB valuation database: Overview of structure, data and results. Wageningen: Foundation for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  20. Willemen, L., Crossman, N. D., Drakou, E., & Palomo, I. (2015). Editorial: Best practices for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 13, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolff, S., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irina Arhipova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elina Konstantinova
    • 2
  • Nameda Belmane
    • 3
  • Gatis Kristaps
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Information TechnologiesLatvia University of Life Sciences and TechnologiesJelgavaLatvia
  2. 2.Centre for Entrepreneurship Innovation and Regional DevelopmentVentspils University CollegeVentspilsLatvia
  3. 3.LTD “Ardenis”RigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations