Advertisement

The Method of Regions’ Typology by the Level of Cluster Potential

  • Elena Kozonogova
  • Julia Dubrovskaya
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/2)

Abstract

The most widely spread form of spatial organization in many countries is clustering. In Russia, cluster policy belongs to the key priorities of the country’s innovative development. This is why special importance get the issues of regional specialization and clusters’ localization. The aim of this research is to present the authors’ typology method for the regions of Russia which is based on such feature of regions as cluster structures’ maturity. The initial theoretical precondition for this research is the statement that successful functioning of a cluster would be possible in a region with high cluster potential as such. At this, under successful functioning of a cluster the authors understand constant improvement of cluster’s performance indicators, regardless state support and participation (or lack of). The offered here typology of territories can be used to define the development strategies for the regions with average and low cluster potentials.

Keywords

Cluster potential Territorial development Regions’ typology Economic mathematical methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Project “Сluster-network model of innovative partnership for the Perm region” № 16-12-59008.

References

  1. Ahmetova, M. I. (2016). Features of formation of cluster-network models of post-industrial economy in the regions of Russia. Regional Economy and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 4(48), 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2004). European innovation scoreboard—EXIS: An exploratory approach to innovation scoreboards. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D., & Dohse, D. (2007). Location: A neglected determinant of firm growth. Review of World Economics, 143(1), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkley, D., & Henry, M. (2002). Targeting industry clusters for regional development: An overview of the redrl approach. Research report 05–2002-03 by Regional Economic Development Research Laboratory Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  5. Cervantes, R., & Dubrovskaya, J. (2016). Differences of regional development in Russia and Mexico: Is cluster policy reducing the gap? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 12875–12890.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, D., & Dahlman, C. (2005). The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and World Bank operations [pdf]. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/KFDLP/Resources/KAM_Paper_WP.pdf
  7. Delgado, M., Porter, M., & Stern, S. (2012, July). Clusters, convergence, and economic performance (NBER Working Papers No. 18250).Google Scholar
  8. Eferina, T. V., Lizunova, V. O., Prosyanyuk, D. V., & Shinova, D. A. (2017). Innovative infrastructure as a factor of interregional differentiation in the Russian Federation. Issues of State and Municipal Management, 1, 191–212.Google Scholar
  9. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2–3), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2006, July). Innobarometer on cluster’s role in facilitating innovation in Europe. Analytical Report [pdf]. Accessed March 18, 2017, from http://cordis.europa.eu/pub/innovation/docs/innobarometer_2006.pdf
  11. European Commission. (2017a). European innovation scoreboard [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
  12. European Commission. (2017b). Smart specialisation platform [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
  13. European Commission. (2017c). The EU industrial R&D investment scoreboard [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard.html
  14. Ketels, Ch. (2004). European clusters. Structural change in Europe. Innovative city and business regions [pdf]. Hagbarth. Accessed March 20, 2017, from http://abclusters.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Ketels_European_Clusters _2004.pdf.
  15. Ketels, Ch. (2009). Clusters, cluster policy, and Swedish competitiveness in the Global Economy. Expert report number 30 to Sweden’s Globalisation Council, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  16. Kevesh, A. L. (2016). Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicator. Moscow: Rosstat.Google Scholar
  17. Lutsenko, E. V., & Korzhakov, V. E. (2011). Some problems of classical cluster analysis. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 4: Natural-Mathematical and Technical Sciences, 2, 91–102.Google Scholar
  18. Moreno, R., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2012). Geographical and sectoral clusters of innovation in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 39, 715–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (2017). About the OECD [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/about/
  20. Pogodaeva, T., Zhaparova, D., & Rudenko, D. (2016). Modeling of the natural resources’ intensive use regions’ innovative development: Problems of circumpolar area innovative system formation. In Financial Environment and Business Development: Proceedings of the 16th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (633 p).Google Scholar
  21. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Science-Metrix. (2017). Who we are [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from http://www.science-metrix.com
  23. The Innovation Policy Platform. (2017). Measurement for policy [online]. Accessed April 10, 2017, from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/measurement-policy
  24. Todtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Varga, S., Vujisic, D., & Zrakovic, M. (2013). State aid for innovation clusters in the republic of Serbia. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2(26), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wennberg, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2008, June). The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics. Google Scholar
  27. Woodward, D. P. (2012). Industry location, economic development incentives, and clusters. The Review of Regional Studies, 42, 5–23.Google Scholar
  28. Zubarevich, N. V. (2014). Regional development and regional policy in Russia. ECO Journal, 4, 7–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Kozonogova
    • 1
  • Julia Dubrovskaya
    • 1
  1. 1.Economics and Finances DepartmentPerm National Research Polytechnic UniversityPermRussia

Personalised recommendations