The goal of intensive treatment is the complete recovery of health conditions, in a way to allow patient’s social rehabilitation. Since this goal is impossible for some patients, the new goal must be the maintenance of their dignity and quality of live, leaving out excessive therapies and ICU admission (SIAARTI Società Italiana di Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva, Minerva Anestesiol 69:3, 2003).
In case of Acute Care Surgery, the surgeon must balance the need to alleviate pain and suffering and the avoidance of overtreatment, including treatment-related morbidity, acting in the best interest of the patient. In case of symptomatic patient, the surgeon must consider whether the patient could benefit from a palliative surgery.
It is important for the surgeon to prognosticate the outcome before surgical decision making, incorporating the knowledge about underlying disease, the possible surgery outcome and the patient’s preferences (Moore and Todd, Common problems in acute care surgery, Springer, 2017).
The surgeon and the anaesthesiologist, both responsible for the same patient, must share decisions, discussing and planning together the best strategy, with the patient and his family too.
The decision should involve also the necessity of ICU recovery after surgery.
To choose appropriately is an everyday challenge in Acute Care Surgery and Intensive Care.
The reduction of inappropriate surgery and consequent inappropriate admission on ICU is a clinical and ethical goal to pursue, on patient’s and global interest.
Acute care surgery ICU Ethics Appropriateness
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, et al. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1166–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward RS, Warren-Boulton F. Considering the effects of financial incentives and professional ethics on ‘appropriate’ medical care. J Health Econ. 1984;3:223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consiglio d’Europa, Comitato dei Ministri. Raccomandazione N.° R (97) 17. del Comitato dei Ministri agli stati membri “Sullo sviluppo e l’attivazione di sistemi di miglioramento della qualità (SMQ) dell’assistenza sanitaria”.Google Scholar
Sanmartin C, Murphy K, Choptain N, Conner-Spady B, McLaren L, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Sanmugasunderam S, De Coster C, McGurran J, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy T. Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: concepts and scoping of the published literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(3):342–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, et al. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(7):766–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RH. Brook. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method In: McCormick, KA, Moore SR, Siegel RA, Methodology perspectives. AHCPR pub. no. 95-0009: Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, 1994, pp. 59-70Google Scholar
Buetow SA, Sibbald B, Cantrill JA, et al. Appropriateness in health care: application to prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavis JN, Anderson GM. Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications. CMAJ. 1996;154:321–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Adversi M, Melotti RM. Il principio di Appropriattezza Clinica quale Criterio di Erogazione della Prestazione Medica. [aut. libro] A cura di Michele Sesta. L’ erogazione della prestazione medica tra diritto alla salute, principio di autodeterminazione e gestione ottimale delle risorse sanitarie. Maggioli; 2014.Google Scholar
Quenot JP, Ecarnot E, Meunier-Beillard N, et al. What are the ethical questions raised by the integration of intensive care into advance care planning? Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(Suppl 4):S46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quenot JP, Ecarnot E, Meunier-Beillard N, et al. What are the ethical dimensions in the profession of intensive care specialist? Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(Suppl 4):S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIAARTI Società Italiana di Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva. Raccomandazioni SIAARTI per l’ammissione e la dimissione dalla terapia intensiva e per la limitazione dei trattamenti in terapia intensiva. Minerva Anestesiol. 2003;69:3.Google Scholar
McCahill LE, Smith DD, Borneman T, Juarez G, Cullinane C, Chu DZ, Ferrell BR, Wagman LD. A prospective evaluation of palliative outcomes for surgery of advanced malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(6):654–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigaud JP, Giabicani M, Beuzelin M, Marchalot A, Ecarnot F, Quenot JP. Ethical aspects of admission or non-admission to the intensive care unit. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(Suppl 4):S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin P, Fox-Robichaud A, Divatia JV, et al. The intensive care unit specialist: report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2016;35:223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myburgh J, Abillama F, Chiumello D, Dobb G, Jacobe S, Kleinpell R, Koh Y, Martin C, Michalsen A, Pelosi P, Torra LB, Vincent JL, Yeager S, Zimmerman J, Council of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2016;34:125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Löfmark R, Nilstun T, Cartwright C, Fischer S, van der Heide A, Morteir F, Norup M, Simonato L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Physicians’ experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia. BMC Med. 2008;6(4):1–8.Google Scholar
Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quenot JP, Ecarnot E, Meunier-Beillard N, et al. What are the ethical aspects surrounding the collegial decisional process in limiting and withdrawing treatment in intensive care? Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(Suppl 4):S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggs J, Schmitt MH, Prendergast TJ, Norton SA, Sellers CR, Quinn JR, Press N. Who is attending? End-of life decision making in the intensive care unit. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(1):56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprung CL, Truog RD, Curtis JR, et al. Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:855–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski SJ, et al. Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2016;20:97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis R, Vincent JL. Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1347–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truglio-Londrigan M, Slyer JT, Singleton JK, Worral P. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Crebbin W, Beasley S, Watters D. Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:422–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis DZ, Hegarty SE, Leoni M, De Palma R, Varga S, Melotti R. Variation in hospital utilization at the end of life for patients with cancer in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy. Tumori. 2016;102:614–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar