Advertisement

Ecology, Innovation, and Quality of Life: AB OVO USQUE AD MALA

  • G. R. Khasaev
  • N. V. LazarevaEmail author
  • G. E. Kudinova
  • R. S. Kuznetsova
  • G. S. Rozenberg
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

With the development of scientific, technical, and socioeconomic processes in industrialized countries in the second half of the twentieth century, a new multidisciplinary scientific direction was “brought to life” and was related to the effective use of the results of research and development aimed at improving the quality of human life—innovation. Naturally, the quality of life of a person cannot be considered in isolation from the state of the natural environment in which this person lives, works, and rests. The goal of the study is to show a close interaction, apparently, of the main sciences of the twenty-first century—ecology and innovation and integrated influence on man. In the contribution, the aspects of innovation activity in ecology (ecological rationing, new methods of bioindication and biomonitoring, waste utilization, ecological audit of the territory, public health, etc.) are considered in detail. The issues of innovation management of nature protection activities aimed at improving the quality of life of the population are discussed in detail. The authors examined “from start to finish” aspects of the interaction between innovation and ecology. The main conclusion is that a program of step-by-step innovation activity is needed that can describe the content and sequence of the planned measures and set the ultimate goals of the reform of the environmental management system, activities.

Keywords

Innovation Ecology Rationing Waste management Bioindication Environmental audit Public health 

References

  1. Bobylev, S.N., Sidorenko, V.N., Safonov, Yu.V., Avaliani, S.L., Strukova, E.B., Golub, A.A.: Macroeconomic Estimation of Costs for Public Health in Russia from Pollution of the Environment. The World Bank Institute, Environmental Protection Fund, Moscow (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Bukharin, O.V., Zakharov, V.M., Zinchenko, T.D., Nemtseva, N.V., Rosenberg, G.S., Shitikov, V.K.: Biomonitoring methods for assessing anthropogenically loaded plain river (using the example of the river Chapaevka). Ecol. Ind. Russia 11, 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Evlanov, I.A., Zibarev, S.S., Rosenberg, G.S.: Reflections on the methods of calculating damage to aquatic biological resources from economic activities. Ecol. Ind. Russia 4, 40–43 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. Gorelik, D.O., Ishanin, G.G., Konopelko, L.A., Khvorov, G.V.: Ecological Atlas of Togliatti. 9 Maps of Scale 1:40 000. NGO “Monitoring”, St. Petersburg (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Konovalov, V.M.: Innovative Saga. “Williams” Publishing House, Moscow (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Kostina, N.V., Rosenberg, A.G., Rosenberg, G.S., Khasayev, G.R.: The indicator of the “ecological trace” and its relationship with other indices of sustainable development. Bull. Samara State Univ. Econ. 9(119), 34–41 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Kostina, N.V.: Analysis of the State and Scenarios for the Development of Socio-ecological and Economic Systems of Territories of Different Scale with the Help of the Expert Information System Region. Cassandra, Togliatti (2015)Google Scholar
  8. Kostina, N.V., Rozenberg, G.S., Kudinova, G.E., Rozenberg, A.G., Pyrsheva, M.V.: “Brainstorm” indices and indicators of sustainable development (for example, the territories of the Volga Basin). South Russia Ecol. Develop. 11(2), 32–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuznetsova, R.S., Zueva, O.G.: Natural-focal morbidity in the territory of the Samara Region. News Samara SC RAS 17(4), 258–268 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. Kuznetsova, R.S., Lazareva, N.V.: Substantiation of economic costs for social damage and losses from the incidence of viral hepatitis S. Bull. Samara State Univ. Econ. 12(158), 61–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. Landrum, G.N.: Profiles of Genius: Thirteen Creative Men Who Changed the World, p. 263. Prometheus Books, Buffalo (1993)Google Scholar
  12. Nilsson, J., Grennfelt, P.: Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Report from a workshop held at Skokloster, Sweden. In: Conference Name: Workshop Organized by UN-ECE and the Nordic Council of Ministers, vol. 15(335), pp. 215–221 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. Rosenberg, G.S.: Analysis of definitions of the concept of “ecology”. Ecology 2, 89–98 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Rosenberg, G.S.: The Volga Basin: Towards Sustainable Development. IEEEB RAS; Kassandra, Togliatti (2009)Google Scholar
  15. Rosenberg, G.S.: Once again to the question of what “ecology” is? Biosphere 2(3), 324–335 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Rosenberg, G.S.: Introduction to the Theoretical ecology. Cassandra, Togliatti (2013)Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, G.S., Pavlov, D.S., Zakharov, V.M., Gelashvili, D.B., Shitikov, V.K.: Biomonitoring for sustainable ecological and economic development of the territories of the Volga Basin. Ecol. Ind. Russia 11, 4–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. Rosenberg, G.S., Evlanov, I.A., Zinchenko, T.D., Shitikov, V.K., Bukharin, O.V., Nemtseva, N.V., Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Pavlov, D.S., Gelashvili, D.B., Zakharov, V.M.: Development of Scientific Foundations and Introduction of a Complex of Biomonitoring Methods for Sustainable Ecological and Economic Development of the Territories of the Volga Basin. Kassandra, Togliatti (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Snakin, V.V.: Ecology and Nature Protection. Dictionary-Reference, p. 384. Academia, Moscow (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Tarasova, N.P., Kruchina, E.B.: Indices and indicators of sustainable development. Sustainable development: nature–society–man. In: Materials of the International Conference, vol. 2, pp. 127–144. RF CCI, Moscow (2006)Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development: Report on the aggregation of indicators for sustainable development: Background Paper No. 2, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  22. World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone, p. 271. World Bank, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  23. Zakharov, V.M.: The Environment Well-Being: The Concept, vol. 30, pp. 13–17. Center for Ecology, Policy of Russia, Moscow (2000)Google Scholar
  24. Zibarev, A.G., Ivanov, M.N., Karpenko, YuD, Kudinova, G.E., Rosenberg, G.S.: Innovation and ecology: cui prodest? Ecol. Ind. Russia 12, 36–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. Zibarev, A.G., Kudinova, G.E., Rosenberg, G.S.: “Shine and poverty” of innovation-ecological development. In: Regions of Russia: Strategies and Mechanisms for Modernization, Innovation and Technological Development. Eighth International Scientific-Practical Conference, vol. 1, pp. 588–592. INION RAS, Moscow (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Khasaev
    • 1
  • N. V. Lazareva
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. E. Kudinova
    • 2
  • R. S. Kuznetsova
    • 2
  • G. S. Rozenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology of the Volga Basin of the Russian Academy of SciencesTogliattiRussia

Personalised recommendations