Advertisement

Constituting Power in Europe

  • Erik O. EriksenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In Europe, sovereignty is pooled and bounded and decision-making power is shared by the EU and member states. This chapter sets out the cosmopolitan dimension of Europe’s liberal political order and clarifies why neither the framework of intergovernmentalism nor that of the federal state fit the EU. The framework of regional cosmopolitanism is a promising way to handle unity in diversity. Only respect for the individual—the ultimate unit of moral concern—gives modern law coherence and unity. The chapter then addresses Habermas’ concept of mixed constituent power and explains why it is shaky on constitutional grounds. Thereafter, it argues that there is a political universitas in Europe based on entrenched dignity protection, and that the integration process has created a European community of obligations.

Keywords

Mixed constituent power Dignity Regional cosmopolitanism Federalism 

References

  1. Altvater, Elmar, et al. 2013. Demokratie oder Kapitalismus? Europa in der Krise. Berlin: Blätter Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1973 [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  3. Avbelj, Matej, and Jan Komárek. 2012. Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  4. Bajnai, Gordon, Thomas Fischer, Stephanie Hare, Sarah Hoffmann, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Vanessa Rossi, Juri Viehoff, and Andrew Watt. 2012. Solidarity: For Sale? The Social Dimensions of the New European Economic Governance. Europe in Dialogue, 2012/1. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/GP_Solidarity.pdf. Accessed on 6 September 2013.
  5. Brown, Garrett W. 2014. The European Union and Kant’s Idea of Cosmopolitanism: Why the EU Is Not Cosmopolitan. European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 671–693.Google Scholar
  6. Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2014. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  7. Bsirske, Frank, Annelie Buntenbach, Rudolf Hicke, Steffen Lehndorff, and Hans-Jürgen Urban. 2012. Call: Founding Europe Anew! Vlaams Marxistisch Tijdschrift 46 (2). http://www.imavo.be/vmt/1222-Call.pdf. Accessed on 6 September 2013.
  8. Bundesverfassungsgericht. 1974. Case BVerfGE 37, 271, Solange I—Decision.Google Scholar
  9. Bundesverfassungsgericht. 1986. Case BVerfGE 73, 339, Solange II—Decision.Google Scholar
  10. Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2009. Judgement of the Second Senate of 30 June 2009, 2 be 2/08. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2009/06/es20090630_2bve000208en.html. Accessed on 13 June 2017.
  11. Cohen, Jean L. 2012. Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conway, Gerard. 2012. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duchêne, Francois. 1994. Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Interdependence. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eriksen, Erik O. 2014. The Normativity of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksen, Erik O., and Jarle Weigård. 2003. Understanding Habermas. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksen, Erik O., and John Erik Fossum. 2012. Rethinking Democracy and the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. European Union. 2007. Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007, 2007/C 306. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12007L%2FTXT. Accessed on 10 February 2017.
  19. European Union. 2012a. The Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), 2012/C 326. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M%2FTXT. Accessed on 10 February 2017.
  20. European Union. 2012b. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, C326/391. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:12012P/TXT.
  21. Fossum, John Erik, and Agustín J. Menéndez. 2011. The Constitution’s Gift: A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  22. Franzius, Claudio. 2010. Europaishe Verfassungsrechtsdenken. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  23. Günther, Klaus. 2017. Divided Sovereignty, Nation and Legal Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory 29 (6): 766–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Habermas, Jürgen. 2014a. A Plea for the Constitutionalization of International Law. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (1): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas, Jürgen. 2014b. Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the European Union into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible. ARENA Working Paper 13/2014. Oslo: ARENA Center for European Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, Jürgen. 2014c. Zur Prinzipienkonkurrenz von Bürgergleichheit und Staatengleichheit im supranationalen Gemeinwesen. Eine Notiz aus Anlass der Frage nach der Legitimität der ungleichen Repräsentation der Bürger im Europäischen Parlament. Der Staat 53 (2): 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Habermas, Jürgen. 2017. Citizen and State Equality in a Supranational Political Community: Degressive Proportionality and the Pouvoir Constituant Mixte. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Joas, Hans. 2011. Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  34. Kalyvas, Andreas. 2008. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kant, Immanuel. 1996 [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kramer, Michal. 2010. Human Dignity in German Law, trans. Michael Prawer. Policy Paper No. 85, The Israel Democracy Institute, Jerusalem. https://en.idi.org.il/media/4017/85_abstract_en.pdf.
  37. Lefort, Claude. 1988. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leick, Romain. 2013. Our Mothers, Our Fathers: Next-Generation WWII Atonement. Spiegel Online, 28 March. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/zdf-tv-miniseries-reopens-german-wounds-of-wwii-past-a-891332-2.html. Accessed on 6 July 2017.
  39. Locke, John. 1967 [1689]. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. 1788. Federalist No. 49: Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention. New York Packet, 5 February.Google Scholar
  41. Margalit, Avishai. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. McCormick, John. 2012. Crisis and the Future of Europe. Cicero Foundation Great Debate Paper 12/06. Paris and Maastricht: The Cicero Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Meyer, Jürgen. 2003. Kommentar zur Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  44. Milward, A. S. 1984. The Reconstruction of Western Europe 1945–51. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1993. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, revised by Kenneth W. Thompson. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Niederberger, Andreas. 2009. Demokratie unter Bedingungen der Weltgesellschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Niesen, Peter. 2017. The ‘Mixed’ Constituent Legitimacy of the European Federation. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Offe, Claus, and Ulrich K. Preuss. 2007. The Problem of Legitimacy in the European Polity: Is Democratization the Answer? In The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict, ed. Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Owen, David. 2018. On the Right to Have Nationality Rights: Statelessness, Citizenship and Human Rights. Netherlands International Law Review 65 (3): 299–317. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patberg, Markus. 2017. The Leveling Up of Constituent Power in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. 2012 [1486]. Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation and Commentary, ed. Francesco Borghesi, Michael Papio, and Massimo Riva. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rawls, John. 1995. Reply to Habermas. The Journal of Philosophy 95: 132–180.Google Scholar
  53. Risse, Thomas. 2014. No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1207–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosen, Michael. 2012. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schäfer, Armin, and Wolfgang Streeck. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. Scheuerman, William E. 2019. Constituent Power and Civil Disobedience: Beyond the Nation State? Journal of International Political Theory 15(1): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitt, Carl. 2008 [1928]. Constitutional Theory, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schulz, Martin. 2013. Der gefesselte Riese: Europas letzte Chance. Berlin: Von Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, D. 2014. When the Peloton Hit the Mud: Displacement Struggles and the EU Crisis. In The European Union in Crises or the European Union as Crises?, ed. J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez, ARENA Report No 2/14. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.Google Scholar
  60. Streeck, Wolfgang. 2013. Gekaufte Zeit: Die vertagte Krisedes demokratischen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  61. Thym, Daniel. 2016. ‘Citizens’ and ‘Foreigners’ in EU Law. Migration Law and Its Cosmopolitan Outlook. European Law Journal 22 (3): 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed on 13 November 2018.
  63. Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Von Bogdandy, Armin. 2006. Constitutional Principles. In Principles of European Constitutional Law, ed. Armin Von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Von Bogdandy, Armin, and Jürgen Bast. 2006. Principles of European Constitutional Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Von Bogdandy, Armin, Mattias Kottmann, Carlino Antpöhler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei, and Maja Smrkolj. 2012. Reverse Solange—Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights Against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review 49 (2): 489–520.Google Scholar
  67. Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1982. Supranational Law and the Supranational System: Legal Structure and Political Process in the European Community. PhD in Law, European University Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/4822. Accessed on 26 May 2017.
  68. Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2001. Federalism Without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg. In The Federal Vision, ed. Kalypso Nicolaïdis and Robert Howse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2003. In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg. In European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, ed. Joseph H.H. Weiler and Marlene Wind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ypi, Lea. 2008. Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the Ethics of European Foreign Policy. European Journal of Political Theory7 (3): 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARENA Centre for European StudiesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations