Advertisement

Introduction: The Predicaments of Differentiation

  • Erik O. EriksenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the topicality and predicament of political differentiation in Europe. It presents the development of a differentiated Europe, and sets out some ways to conceptualise the phenomenon. The chapter looks at how differentiation has become increasingly entrenched in the legal framework of the EU, as several treaties have formalised possibilities for both enhanced cooperation and opt-outs or exceptions. Then, it introduces some potential negative effects of political differentiation, and how it can lead to dominance or arbitrary rule. Lastly, the chapter gives an overview of book.

Keywords

Differentiation European integration Vertical and horizontal differentiation Democratic rule 

References

  1. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avbelj, Matej. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Farewell to the EU-27? German Law Journal 14 (1): 191–212.Google Scholar
  3. Boffey, D., and Rankin, J. 2017. UK Will Rejoin the EU One Day, Suggests Jean-Claude Juncker. The Guardian, 10 March. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/10/jean-claude-juncer-uk-rejoin-eu-one-day-brexit. Accessed on 25 May 2017.
  4. Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2014. The Beheading of the Legislative Power. European Constitutionalism Between Capitalism and Democracy. In The European Union in Crises and the European Union as Crises?, ed. J.E. Fossum and A. Menéndez, ARENA Report No. 2/14.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, Paul. 2014. Economic Governance and the Euro Crisis: Constitutional Architecture and Constitutional Implications. In The Constitutionalization of European Budgetary Constraints, ed. Maurice Adams, Federico Fabbrini, and Pierre Larouche, 19–40. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsche Welle. 2017. Merkel Backs Idea of ‘Multispeed Europe’ at Versailles Meet. 6 March. http://www.dw.com/en/merkel-backs-idea-of-multispeed-europe-at-versailles-meet/a-37833273. Accessed on 24 May 2017.
  7. De Witte, Bruno, Andrea Ott, and Ellen Vos. 2017. Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Easton, David. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  9. Eriksen, E.O. 2017. Democratic Innovations Beyond the State. In The Crisis of the European Union: Challenges, Analyses, Solutions, ed. Andreas Grimmel, 199–214. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen, Erik O., and John Erik Fossum. 2015. The European Union’s Non-members: Independence Under Hegemony? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. 2017. White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. COM(2017)2025 of 1 March 2017.Google Scholar
  12. European Union. 2012. The Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), 2012/C 326. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M%2FTXT. Accessed on 10 February 2017.
  13. Fabbrini, Sergio. 2015. Which European Union? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fossum, John Erik. 2015. Democracy and Differentiation in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 799–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fossum, John Erik, and Hans Petter Graver. 2017. Squaring the Circle on Brexit: Could the Norway Model Work? Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Genschel, Philipp, and Markus Jachtenfuchs. 2016. More Integration, Less Federation: The European Integration of Core State Powers. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (1): 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, Jürgen. 2016a. Core Europe to the Rescue: A Conversation with Jürgen Habermas About Brexit and the EU Crisis. Social Europe, 12 July. https://www.socialeurope.eu/2016/07/core-europe-to-the-rescue/. Accessed on 26 May 2017.
  19. Habermas, Jürgen. 2016b. For a Democratic Polarisation: How to Pull the Ground From Under Right-Wing Populism. Social Europe, 17 November. https://www.socialeurope.eu/2016/11/democratic-polarisation-pull-ground-right-wing-populism/. Accessed on 26 May 2017.
  20. Habermas, Jürgen, and Jacques Derrida. 2003. February 15, or What Binds European Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe. Constellations 10 (3): 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joerges, Christian. 2014. Three Transformations of Europe and the Search for a Way Out of Its Crisis. In The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism Versus Democratic Governance, ed. Christian Joerges and Carola Glinski, 25–46. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  23. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian. 2016. Beyond Integration Theory: The (Anti-)Constitutional Dimension of European Crisis Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (6): 1350–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leruth, Benjamin, and Christopher Lord. 2015. Differentiated Integration in the European Union: A Concept, a Process, a System or a Theory? Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 754–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leuffen, Dirk, Berthold Rittberger, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levy, Daniel, Max Pensky, and John Torpey (eds.). 2005. Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe. Transatlantic Relations after the Iraq War. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Lord, Christopher. 2017. Differentiated Authority Relations in the EU. Paper Presented at ARENA Research in Progress Seminar, Oslo, Norway, 14 February.Google Scholar
  28. Menéndez, Agustín J. 2013. The Existential Crisis of the European Union. German Law Journal 14 (5): 453–525.Google Scholar
  29. Niemann, Arne, and Demosthenes Ioannou. 2015. European Economic Integration in Times of Crisis: A Case of Neofunctionalism? Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Offe, Claus, and Ulrich K. Preuss. 2016. Citizens in Europe: Essays on Democracy, Constitutionalism and European Integration. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  31. Piris, Jean-Claude. 2012. The Future of Europe: Towards a Two-Speed EU? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2009. Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity. European Political Science Review 1 (2): 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2014. European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Post Functionalism. Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schimmelfennig, Frank, Dirk Leuffen, and Berthold Rittberger. 2015. The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 764–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmitt, Carl. 1996 [1932]. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schwarzer, Daniela. 2015. The Euro Area Crises, Shifting Power Relations and Institutional Change in the European Union. Global Policy 3 (Supplement 1): 28–41.Google Scholar
  38. Somek, Alexander. 2015. Delegation and Authority: Authoritarian Liberalism Today. European Law Journal 21 (3): 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strzelecki, Marek. 2017. Poland Talks Tough Against ‘Multi-Speed’ EU Ahead of Rome Summit. Bloomberg, 23 March. https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-03-23/poland-talks-tough-against-multi-speed-eu-ahead-of-rome-summit. Accessed on 24 May 2017.
  40. Stubb, Alexander C. 1996. A Categorization of Differentiated Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 34: 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. The Economist. 2017. Europe’s Future Is Multi-Speed and Multi-Tier. 23 March. http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21719193-eu-must-embrace-greater-differentiation-or-face-potential-disintegration-europes. Accessed on 1 April 2017.
  42. Tuori, Kaarlo, and Klaus Tuori. 2014. The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Verdun, Amy. 2015. A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2012. Foreword. In The Future of Europe: Towards a Two-Speed EU?, ed. Jean-Claude Piris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. White, Jonathan. 2015. Emergency Europe. Political Studies 63 (2): 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wintour, P. 2017. Plans for Two-Speed EU Risk Split with “Peripheral” Members. The Guardian, 14 February. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/14/plans-for-two-speed-eu-risk-split-with-peripheral-members. Accessed on 24 May 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARENA Centre for European StudiesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations