Advertisement

Do Public and Government Think Similar About Indian Cleanliness Campaign?

  • Aarzoo DhimanEmail author
  • Durga Toshniwal
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 898)

Abstract

With the growth of internet, social networks has become primary source for people to present their views on different topics. The data collected from social media are considered enough as well as reliable to be processed and gather insights on the perceptions of people towards any topic. In this research work, an empirical study of the Twitter data (i.e. around 400,000 tweets) collected for the period of December 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018, pertaining to Indian Cleanliness Campaign called Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (SBA), which focuses on improving the cleanliness situation in the country, has been done. Here, a demographic distribution of the Twitter data has been generated by augmenting partial keyword matching along with Named Entity Recognition for geoparsing the tweets. This will help to study the involvement of the people in different areas of the country. Furthermore, Sentiment Analysis of the tweets has been performed to gather the perception of people towards the campaign. Also, to assure the integrity of the campaign, the tweets have been segregated into public and government generated tweets and the respective sentiments have been compared to determine the difference in perception of public and government in different areas of the country. This work can be considered of interest because there has not been any research work which focuses on analyzing the awareness and perception of people on SBA in detail.

Keywords

Indian cleanliness campaign Swachh Bharat Abhiyan Social media data analysis Twitter Sentiment analysis Demographic analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Aramaki, E., Maskawa, S., Morita, M.: Twitter catches the flu: detecting influenza epidemics using Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Conference On Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1568–1576. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Culotta, A.: Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing twitter messages. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pp. 115–122. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Quincey, E., Kostkova, P.: Early warning and outbreak detection using social networking websites: the potential of Twitter. In: Kostkova, P. (ed.) eHealth 2009. LNICST, vol. 27, pp. 21–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fellbaum, C.: WordNet. Wiley Online Library (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gelernter, J., Mushegian, N.: Geo-parsing messages from microtext. Trans. GIS 15(6), 753–773 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M.H., Patel, R.S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M.S., Brilliant, L.: Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457(7232), 1012 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    New government policies and programmes, April 2018. https://powermin.nic.in/en/content/new-government-policies-and-programmes
  8. 8.
    Lampos, V., Cristianini, N.: Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web. In: 2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing (CIP), pp. 411–416. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lampos, V., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N.: Flu detector - tracking epidemics on Twitter. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6323, pp. 599–602. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15939-8_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raj, S., Kajla, T.: Sentiment analysis of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Int. J. Bus. Anal. Intell. 3(1), 32 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swachh Bharat Mission-Gramin, April 2018. http://swachhbharatmission.gov.in/sbmcms/index.htm
  12. 12.
    Snow, J.: On the mode of communication of cholera. Edinb. Med. J. 1(7), 668 (1856)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swachh Survekshan 2018, April 2018. https://www.swachhsurvekshan2018.org
  14. 14.
    Tayal, D.K., Yadav, S.K.: Sentiment analysis on social campaign “Swachh Bharat Abhiyan” using unigram method. AI Soc. 32(4), 633–645 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wikipedia: Classification of Indian cities (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_Indian_cities.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations