Advertisement

Monitoring of Air Quality with Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors and the Use of Artificial Neural Networks for the Atmospheric Pollutants Concentration Levels Prediction

  • Ana LunaEmail author
  • Alvaro Talavera
  • Hector Navarro
  • Luis Cano
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 898)

Abstract

This paper shows the preliminary results of the monitoring and estimation of air pollutants at a strategic point within the district of San Isidro, Lima - Peru. Low-cost, portable, wireless and geo-locatable electrochemical sensors were used to capture reliable contamination levels in real-time which could be used not only to quantify atmospheric pollution exposure but also for prevention and control, and even for legislative purposes. For the prediction of \(CO{_2}\) and \(SO{_2}\) levels, computational intelligence algorithms were applied and validated with experimental data. We proved that the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) has a high potential as a tool to use it as a forecast methodology in the area of air pollution.

Keywords

Electrochemical sensors Air pollution Artificial Neural Networks 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Universidad del Pacífico and in particular the Department of Engineering for the purchase of the air and sound pollution sensors; and of the SIM cards used for data transmission. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Mrs. Jimena Sánchez Velarde, Director of datosabiertosperu.com and Pamela Olenka Peña, Manager of Sustainability of the Municipality of San Isidro, who authorized the use of the facilities within the Municipality, allowing the realization of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Alphasense: CO-B4 Carbon Monoxide Sensor 4-Electrode (2015). http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/COB41.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  2. 2.
    Alphasense: OX-B431 Oxidising Gas Sensor Ozone + Nitrogen Dioxide 4-Electrode (2017). http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/OX-B431.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  3. 3.
    Alphasense: SO2-B4 Sulfur Dioxide Sensor 4-Electrode (2017). http://www.alphasense.com/WEB1213/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/SO2-B4.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018
  4. 4.
    Chiang, T.Y., Yuan, T.H., Shie, R.H., Chen, C.F., Chan, C.C.: Increased incidence of allergic rhinitis, bronchitis and asthma, in children living near a petrochemical complex with SO2 pollution. Environ. Int. 96, 1–7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Day, O., et al.: Air Pollution and Health (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallo, C., Contò, F., Fiore, M.: A neural network model for forecasting CO2 emission. Agris On-line Pap. Econ. Inf. 6(2), 31 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghozikali, M.G., Mosaferi, M., Safari, G.H., Jaafari, J.: Effect of exposure to O3, NO2, and SO2 on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations in Tabriz, Iran. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22(4), 2817–2823 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenberg, N., et al.: Different effects of long-term exposures to SO2 and NO2 air pollutants on asthma severity in young adults. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A 79(8), 342–351 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haykin, S.: Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. Technical report, Macmilan (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang, Q., et al.: Citizen sensing for improved urban environmental monitoring. J. Sens. 2016(2), 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Landrigan, P.J.: Air pollution and health. Lancet Public Health 2(1), e4–e5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nigam, S., Nigam, R., Kapoor, S.: Forecasting carbon monoxide concentration using artificial neural network modeling. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975 – 8887), International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing “ICCTAC-2013”, pp. 36–40 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ortiz-García, E., Salcedo-Sanz, S., Pérez-Bellido, Á., Portilla-Figueras, J., Prieto, L.: Prediction of hourly O3 concentrations using support vector regression algorithms. Atmos. Environ. 44(35), 4481–4488 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piedrahita, R., et al.: The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7(10), 3325 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spinelle, L., Gerboles, M., Villani, M.G., Aleixandre, M., Bonavitacola, F.: Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 215, 249–257 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun, L., et al.: Development and application of a next generation air sensor network for the Hong Kong marathon 2015 air quality monitoring. Sensors 16(2), 211 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong, G.W.K.: Air pollution and health. Lancet Respir. Med. 2(1), 8–9 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Luna
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alvaro Talavera
    • 1
  • Hector Navarro
    • 1
  • Luis Cano
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad del PacíficoLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations