Advertisement

Upwind-Based Numerical Approximation of a Space-Time Fractional Advection-Dispersion Equation for Groundwater Transport Within Fractured Systems

  • A. Allwright
  • A. AtanganaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 194)

Abstract

Modelling groundwater transport in fractured aquifer systems is complex due to the uncertainty associated with delineating the specific fractures along which water and potential contaminants could be transported. The resulting uncertainty in modelled contaminant movement has implications for the protection of the environment, where inadequate mitigation or remediation measures could be employed. To improve the governing equation for groundwater transport modelling, the Atangana–Baleanu in Caputo sense (ABC) fractional derivative is applied to the advection-dispersion equation with a focus on the advection term to account for anomalous advection. Boundedness, existence and uniqueness for the developed advection-focused transport equation is presented. In addition, a semi-discretisation analysis is performed to demonstrate the equation stability in time. Augmented upwind schemes are investigated as they have been found to address stability problems when solute transport is advection-dominated. The upwind-based schemes are developed, and stability analysis conducted, to facilitate the solution of the complex equation. The numerical stability analysis found the upwind Crank–Nicolson to be the most stable, and is thus recommended for use with the ABC fractional advection-dispersion equation.

Keywords

Fractional calculus Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative Fractional advection-dispersion equation 

References

  1. 1.
    Koch, D.L., Brady, J.F.: Anomalous diffusion in heterogeneous porous media. Phys. Fluids 31(5), 965–973 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schumer, R., Benson, D.A., Meerschaert, M.M., Baeumer, B.: Multiscaling fractional advection-dispersion equations and their solutions. Water Resour. Res. 39(1), 1–11 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dentz, M., Scher, H.: Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Rev. Geophys. 44(2), 1–49 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singha, K., Day-Lewis, F.D., Lane, J.W.: Geoelectrical evidence of bicontinuum transport in groundwater. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34(12), 1–14 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, Y., Papelis, C., Young, M.H., Berli, M.: Challenges in the application of fractional derivative models in capturing solute transport in porous media: Darcy-scale fractional dispersion and the influence of medium properties. Math. Probl. Eng. 1, 1–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neuman, S.P., Tartakovsky, D.M.: Perspective on theories of non-Fickian transport in heterogeneous media. Adv. Water Resour. 32(5), 670–680 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Y., Benson, D.A., Reeves, D.M.: Time and space nonlocalities underlying fractional-derivative models: distinction and literature review of field applications. Adv. Water Resour. 32(4), 561–581 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, H., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Reeves, D.M.: Use of a variable-index fractional-derivative model to capture transient dispersion in heterogeneous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 157, 47–58 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allwright, A., Atangana, A.: Fractal advection-dispersion equation for groundwater transport in fractured aquifers with self-similarities. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133(2), 1–14 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    West, B.J.: Fractional Calculus View of Complexity: Tomorrow’s Science. CRC Press, Florida (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oldham, K.B., Spanier, J.: The Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applications of Differentiation and Integration to Arbitrary Order. Academic, New York (1974)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrmann, R.: Fractional Calculus: An Introduction for Physicists. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, C., Qian, D., Chen, Y.: On riemann-liouville and caputo derivatives. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 1, 1–15 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 73–85 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: Applications of new time and spatial fractional derivatives with exponential kernels. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2(1), 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yépez-Martínez, H., Gómez-Aguilar, J.F.: A new modified definition of Caputo-Fabrizio fractional-order derivative and their applications to the Multi Step Homotopy Analysis Method (MHAM). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 346, 247–260 (2019)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atangana, A., Baleanu, D.: New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: theory and application to heat transfer model. Therm. Sci. 20(2), 763–769 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atangana, A., Gómez-Aguilar, J.F.: A new derivative with normal distribution kernel: theory, methods and applications. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 476, 1–14 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morales-Delgado, V.F., Gómez-Aguilar, J.F., Escobar-Jiménez, R.F., Taneco-Hernández, M.A.: Fractional conformable derivatives of Liouville-Caputo type with low-fractionality. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 503, 424–438 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atangana, A., Gómez-Aguilar, J.F.: Hyperchaotic behaviour obtained via a nonlocal operator with exponential decay and Mittag-Leffler laws. Chaos Solitons Fractals 102, 285–294 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, H., Hao, X., Zhang, Y., Baleanu, D.: Relaxation and diffusion models with non-singular kernels. Phys. A 468, 590–596 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmelling, S.G., Ross, RR.: Contaminant transport in fractured media: models for decision makers. (EPA Superfund) Issue Paper, Groundwater 28(2), 272–279 (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zimmerman, D.A., De Marsily, G., Gotway, C.A., Marietta, M.G., Axness, C.L., Beauheim, R.L., Gallegos, D.P.: A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow. Water Resour. Res. 34(6), 1373–1413 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fomin, S., Chugunov, V., Hashida, T.: The effect of non-Fickian diffusion into surrounding rocks on contaminant transport in a fractured porous aquifer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 461(2061), 2923–2939 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goode, D.J., Tiedeman, C.R., Lacombe, P.J., Imbrigiotta, T.E., Shapiro, A.M., Chapelle, F.H.: Contamination in fractured-rock aquifers: research at the former naval air warfare center, West Trenton, New Jersey, p. 3074 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cello, P.A., Walker, D.D., Valocchi, A.J., Loftis, B.: Flow dimension and anomalous diffusion of aquifer tests in fracture networks. Vadose Zone J. 8(1), 258–268 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shapiro, A.M.: The challenge of interpreting environmental tracer concentrations in fractured rock and carbonate aquifers. Hydrogeol. J. 19(1), 9–12 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Masciopinto, C., Palmiotta, D.: Flow and transport in fractured aquifers: new conceptual models based on field measurements. Transp. Porous Media 96(1), 117–133 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allwright, A., Atangana, A.: Augmented upwind numerical schemes for a fractional advection-dispersion equation in fractured groundwater systems. Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst.-Ser. S 1, 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tateishi, A.A., Ribeiro, H.V., Lenzi, E.K.: The role of fractional time-derivative operators on anomalous diffusion. Front. Phys 5(52), 1–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Atangana, A., Gómez-Aguilar, J.F.: Decolonisation of fractional calculus rules: breaking commutativity and associativity to capture more natural phenomena. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 1–22 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alkahtani, B.S.T., Koca, I., Atangana, A.: New numerical analysis of Riemann-Liouville time-fractional Schrödinger with power, exponential decay, and Mittag-Leffler laws. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10(8), 4231–4243 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Allwright, A., Atangana, A.: Augmented upwind numerical schemes for the groundwater transport advection-dispersion equation with local operators. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 87, 437–462 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ewing, R.E., Wang, H.: A summary of numerical methods for time-dependent advection-dominated partial differential equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 128(1), 423–445 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atangana, A.: On the stability and convergence of the time-fractional variable order telegraph equation. J. Comput. Phys. 293, 104–114 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gnitchogna, R., Atangana, A.: New two-step Laplace Adam-Bashforth method for integer a noninteger order partial differential equations. Numer. Methods Partial. Differ. Equ. 1, 1–20 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Agricultural and Natural SciencesInstitute for Groundwater Studies, University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations