Advertisement

Process Weakness Patterns for the Identification of Digitalization Potentials in Business Processes

  • Florian RittmeierEmail author
  • Gregor Engels
  • Alexander Teetz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 342)

Abstract

An important element of digital transformation is the digitalization of processes within enterprises. A major challenge is the systematic identification of digitalization potentials in business processes. Existing approaches require process analysts who identify these potentials by using the time-consuming method of pattern catalogs or by relying on their professional experiences. In this paper, we classify potentials of digitalization and derive corresponding patterns for a future pattern-based analysis procedure. This shall enable the automated identification of digitalization potentials in BPMN diagrams. Those patterns were derived from our work with five companies from different sectors. In comparison to existing approaches, our proposed method could support a more efficient and effective identification of digitalization potentials by process analysts.

Keywords

Digitalization potentials Process weakness patterns BPI Digital transformation Information flow modeling Requirements engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article was written in the context of the project Business 4.0 (http://owl-morgen.de/projekte/business-40/), which is part of the integrated action concept “OWL 4.0 - Industry, Labour, Society”. The project is supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

References

  1. Dumas, M., et al.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Falk, T.: Evaluation of a pattern-based approach for business process improvement. In: Leimeister, J.M., Brenner, W. (eds.) Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017), pp. 241–255 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. Fischer, H., Engler, M., Sauer, S.: A human-centered perspective on software quality: acceptance criteria for work 4.0. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2017. LNCS, vol. 10288, pp. 570–583. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Förster, A., et al.: Verification of business process quality constraints based on visual process patterns. In: First Joint IEEE/IFIP Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE 2007). IEEE 2007, pp. 197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2007.56
  5. Höhenberger, S., Delfmann, P.: Supporting business process improvement through business process weakness pattern collections. In: Thomas, O., Teuteberg, F. (eds.) Smart Enterprise Engineering: 12. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, WI 2015, Osnabrück, Germany, 4–6 March 2015, pp. 378–392 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. Object Management Group. Business process model and notation (BPMN), Version 2.0. (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Phalp, K., Shepperd, M.: Quantitative analysis of static models of processes. J. Syst. Softw. 52(2–3), 105–112 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00136-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Turban, B.M., Schmitz-Lenders, J.: A Pattern-Based Question Checklist for Deriving Requirements from BPMN Models. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 308, pp. 630–641. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., Majeed, B.: Business process analysis and optimization: beyond reengineering. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 38(1), 69–82 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905812CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Rittmeier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregor Engels
    • 1
  • Alexander Teetz
    • 2
  1. 1.SI-LabPaderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computer SciencePaderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations