Twittersphere: Re/Tweeting the Future

  • Shekh MoinuddinEmail author
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)


The Twittersphere shows both global and national perspectives in the shape of pictotextuality—in terms of both text and pictures and hashtag politics—when an issue trends for political reasons in the spatiality. The Twittersphere has controlled the flow of information or news or agenda in politics and such flows are based on network and mediated politics with respect to the number of users and social networking sites, respectively.


Pictotextuality Hashtag politics Mediated Network Heartland 


  1. Appadurai A (1996) Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalisation. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardoin PJ (2013) Why don’t you tweet?: the congressional black caucus’ social media gap. Race, Gender & Class 20(1–2):130–140Google Scholar
  3. Bertrand I, Hughes P (2005) Media research methods: audiences, institutions, texts. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brass P (2003) The production of Hindu-Muslim violence in contemporary India. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  5. Castells M (1996) The rise of network society. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells M (2009) Communication power. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke KM (2017) Rethinking soverignty through hashtag publics: the new body politics. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  8. Cosgrove D (2008) Geography and vision: seeing, imaging and representing the world. I. B. TAURIS, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis RH (1997) Lives of indian images. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis B (2013) Hashtag politics: the polyphonic revolution of #Twitter. Pepperdine J Commun Res 1, Article 4. Last accessed 15 Oct 2017Google Scholar
  11. Everett A, Caldwell JT (eds) (2003) New media: theories and practices of digitextuality. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Farooqui A, Sridharan E (2017) Uttar Pradesh elections 2017: failure of pre-electoral coalition. Econ Polit Wkly LII(15):16–20Google Scholar
  13. Gainous J, Wagner KM (2014) Tweeting to power: the social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerbaudo P (2012) Tweets and the Street: Social Media and Contemporary Activism Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasan Z (2010) Political parties. In: Jayal NG, Mehta PB (eds) The Oxford companion to politics in India. Oxford University of Press, New Delhi, pp 241–253Google Scholar
  16. Jeffares S (2014) Interpreting hashtag politics: policy ideas in an era of social media. Palgrave-Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffrey C, Jeffery P, Jeffery R (2008) Dalit revolution? New politicians in Uttar Pradesh, India. J Asian Stud 67(4):1365–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kopomaa T (2004) Speaking mobile: intensified everyday life, condensed city. In: Graham S (ed) The cyber cities reader. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kudaisya G (2006) Region, nation, heartland: Uttar Pradesh in India’s body politics. Sage Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakeoff G, Johnson M (1980) The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4:195–208. ( Accessed 13 Jan 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madianou M, Miller D (2012) Migration and new media: transnational families and polymedia. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mackinder HJ (1904) The geographical pivot of history. Geogr J 23(4):421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McMillan A (2010) The election commission. In: Jayal NG, Mehta PB (eds) The Oxford companion to politics in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 98–116Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell C (2011) Doing visual research. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  25. Moinuddin S (2015) Negotiating social media: facet of digital culture in India. Mass Media: Commun Res J 4(43):13–19. New Delhi. ISSN 2277-7369Google Scholar
  26. Moinuddin S (2017) Mediascape and the state: a geographical interpretation of image politics in Uttar Pradesh, India. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oldenburg R (1989) The great good place: cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Palashikar S (2017) India’s second dominant party system. Econ Polit Wkly LII(12): 12–15Google Scholar
  29. Pinney C (2004) Photos of the Gods: the printed image and political struggle in India. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Puniyani R (2003) Communal politics: facts versus myth. Sage Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. Rajagopal A (2001) Politics after television: Hindu nationalism and the reshaping of the public in India. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramaseshan R (2017) Messages, mathematics and silence in BJP’s UP win. Econ Polit Wkly LII(12):16–19Google Scholar
  33. Soja E (2009) Thirdspace: towards a new consciousness of space and spatiality. In: Ikas K, Wegner G (eds) Communicating in the third space. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Straus JR, Glassman ME, Shogan CJ, Smelcer SN (2013) Communicating in 140 characters or less: congressional adoption of Twitter in the 111th congress. Am Polit Sci Assoc 46(1):60–66Google Scholar
  35. Tiwari M, Pandey R (2013) Battle ground UP: politics in the land of Ram. Tranquebar, ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  36. Warf B, Arias S (2009) The spatial turn: interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Culture, Media and GovernanceJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations