Advertisement

Conclusions and Implications: The Take Out

  • Summer Melody PennellEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

Conceptual gains surrounding learning and social justice, as well as curricular gains in critical literacy and numeracy skills, are summarized in the conclusion. Students who engaged in the learning material, took risks, and ventured outside of their comfort zones or primary stability had the greatest gains. Alternately, students who remained in their primary stability and were not as engaged did not have practical or conceptual learning gains. Implications for interdisciplinary teaching, English Language Arts, and mathematics classes are shared (and connected to Common Core State Standards), along with ideas for teacher education and education research. Lastly, implications for queer pedagogy and theory are explored.

References

  1. An, S., Capraro, M. M., & Tillman, D. A. (2013). Elementary teachers integrate music activities into regular mathematics lessons: Effects on students’ mathematical abilities. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 9(1). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0js732gf.
  2. Bower-Phipps, L., Powell, J. S., Bivona, M., Harmon, R., & Olcott, A. (2017). Re-drawing the line: Queering our pedagogy in the early childhood classroom. In S. M. Pennell, A. S. Boyd, H. Parkhouse, & A. LaGarry (Eds.), Possibilities in practice: Social justice teaching in the disciplines (pp. 27–39). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Britzman, D. (1995) Is there a queer pedagogy? Or, stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45(2), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bull, K. B., & Dupuis, J. B. (2014). Nonfiction and interdisciplinary inquiry: Multimodal learning in English and biology. English Journal, 103(3), 73–79.Google Scholar
  5. Burgess, K. (2018, July 24). Adoption law spurs fears of discrimination against LGBT kids in foster care. The Wichita Eagle. Retrieved from https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/prairie-politics/article215116760.html.
  6. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  7. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2018a). English language arts standards, anchor standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/CCRA/R/.
  8. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2018b). Standards for mathematical practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/.
  9. DePalma, R. (2010). The no outsiders project: In search of queer primary pedagogies. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship & Pedagogy, 21(2), 47–58.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, J. L., & Dauber, S. L. (1995). Effects on students of an interdisciplinary program linking social studies, art, and family volunteers in the middle grades. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 114–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, C. (2010). Interdisciplinary approach: Advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. ESSAI, 7(1), 26.Google Scholar
  14. Larson, E. (2004). The devil in the white city: Murder, magic, and madness at the fair that changed America. New York: Vintage. Google Scholar
  15. Miller, J. L. (1998). Autobiography as a queer curriculum practice. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 365–373). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Muñoz, J. E. (2007). Cruising the toilet: LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka, radical black traditions, and queer futurity. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies13(2), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. North, C. E. (2009). Teaching for social justice?: Voices from the front lines. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Pekter, N., & McAskill, B. (2014). “To be English, Math, and History”: A multidisciplinary project for students and teachers. English Journal, 103(3), 48–55.Google Scholar
  19. Pennell, S. M., Boyd, A. S., Parkhouse, H., & LaGarry, A. (Eds.). (2017). Possibilities in practice: Social justice teaching in the disciplines. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39–54.Google Scholar
  21. Sleczkowski, C. (2017, March 30). 20% of millennials identify as LGBTQ, according to new GLAAD study. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/20-percent-millennials-lgbtq-glaad-study_us_58dd140be4b05eae031d8f9c.
  22. Warnick, B. R., & Stemhagen, K. (2007). Mathematics teachers as moral educators: The implications of conceiving of mathematics as a technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitlock, R. (2010). Getting queer: Teacher education, gender studies, and the cross-disciplinary quest for queer pedagogies. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(2), 81–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Truman State UniversityKirksvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations