Advertisement

Math for a Cause: Preparation for the Journey

  • Summer Melody PennellEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the theoretical framework and research methods used, beginning with an overview of how the course was designed. Queer pedagogy was the overall theoretical lens, through which social justice pedagogy was used as the content focus with teaching strategies based on critical literacy and critical mathematics. These theories are considered together to create an interdisciplinary literature review. Next, the methodology of post-critical ethnography and queer methods is explored. Data collection included interviews with focal students, audio recordings of student group work and whole-class discussions, field notes, analytical memos, an interview with the cooperating teacher, student pre-and-post-course surveys, and written student work in response to literacy and mathematics prompts.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boellstorff, T. (2007). Queer studies in the house of anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 17–35.Google Scholar
  4. Britzman, D. (1995a). Is there a queer pedagogy? Or stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45(2), 151–165.Google Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. (1995b). “The question of belief”: Writing poststructural ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 229–238.Google Scholar
  6. Britzman, D. (2012). Queer pedagogy and its strange techniques. In E. Meiners & T. Quinn (Eds.), Sexualities in education: A reader (pp. 292–308). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Britzman, D. P., & Gilbert, J. (2004). What will have been said about gayness in teacher education. Teaching Education, 15(1), 81–96.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (2010). Queer methods and methodologies. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  9. Chappell, B. (2015, June 26). Supreme Court declares same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states. National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/06/26/417717613/supreme-court-rules-all-states-must-allow-same-sex-marriages.
  10. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  11. Davies, J. (2009). A space for play: Crossing boundaries and learning online. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices (pp. 27–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. DePalma, R. (2010). The no outsiders project: In search of queer primary pedagogies. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship & Pedagogy, 21(2), 47–58.Google Scholar
  13. Depasquale, J. (2009). Working within and against heterosexist and homophobic schools: Social justice and high school journalism. In R. Rogers, M. A. Kramer, M. Mosley & Literacy for Social Justice Teacher Research Group (Eds.), Designing socially just learning communities: Critical literacy education across the lifespan (pp. 159–170). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dowdall, C. (2009). Masters and critics: Children as producers of online digital texts. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital literacies: Social learning and classroom practices (pp. 43–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Frankenstein, M. (2005). Reading the world with math. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 19–28). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  16. Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(3), 7–16.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  19. Glazer, E. (2001). Using internet primary sources to teach critical thinking skills in mathematics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstein, T., Russell, V., & Daley, A. (2007). Safe, positive and queering moments in teaching education and schooling: A conceptual framework. Teaching Education, 18(3), 183–199.Google Scholar
  21. Goodall Jr., H. L. (2000). Writing the new ethnography (Vol. 7). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. Google Scholar
  22. Groenke, S. L. (2008). Missed opportunities in cyberspace: Preparing preservice teachers to facilitate critical talk about literature through computer-mediated communication. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(3), 224–233.Google Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez, L. A. (2014). Youth social justice engagement in the face of Anti-Latina/o immigrant illegitimacy. The Urban Review, 46(2), 307–323.Google Scholar
  24. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.Google Scholar
  25. Heffernan, L. (2004). Critical literacy and writer’s workshop: Bringing purpose and passion to student writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  26. Hytten, K. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: Research as a pedagogical encounter. In G. W. Noblit, S. Y. Flores, & E. G. Murillo (Eds.), Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique (pp. 95–105). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hytten, K. (2008). Critical thinking, social justice and the role of philosophy. In J. Diem & R. Helfenbein (Eds.), Unsettling beliefs: Teaching social theory to teachers (pp. 185–200). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175–186.Google Scholar
  29. Krywanczyk, L. (2007). Queering public school pedagogy as a first-year teacher. Radical Teacher, 79, 27–34.Google Scholar
  30. Kumashiro, K. (2001). Queer students of color and antiracist, antiheterosexist education: Paradoxes of identity and activism. In K. Kumashiro (Ed.), Troubling intersections of race and sexuality: Queer students of color and anti-oppressive education (pp. 1–25). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
  32. Lawless, E. J. (1992). “I was afraid someone like you…an outsider…would misunderstand”: Negotiating interpretive differences between ethnographers and subjects. Journal of American Folklore, 105(417), 302–314.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, M. M. (2012). Pedagogy and the sista’ professor: Teaching black queer feminist studies through the self. In E. Meiners & T. Quinn (Eds.), Sexualities in education: A reader (pp. 33–40). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  34. Luhmann, S. (1998). Queering/querying pedagogy? Or, pedagogy is a pretty queer thing. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 141–156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory into Practice, 51(1), 4–11.Google Scholar
  36. Macintosh, L. (2007). Does anyone have a band-aid? Anti-homophobia discourses and pedagogical impossibilities. Educational Studies, 41(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  37. Malinowski, B. (1950). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, by Bronislaw Malinowski… with a Preface by Sir James George Frazer… With 5 Maps, 65 Illustrations, and 2 Figures. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
  38. Mayo, C. (2007). Intermittently queer. In N. Rodriquez & W. Pinar (Eds.), Queering straight teachers: Discourse and identity in education (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. McGee Banks, C. A., & Banks, J. A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 152–158.Google Scholar
  40. McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2011). Critical literacy as comprehension: Understanding at deeper levels. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 278–282). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, E. J. (2007). “But I’m not gay”: What straight teachers need to know about queer theory. In N. M. Rodriguez & W. F. Pinar (Eds.), Queering straight teachers: Discourse and identity in education (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  42. Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
  43. Myers, J., & Eberfors, F. (2010). Globalizing English through intercultural critical literacy. English Education, 42(2), 148–170.Google Scholar
  44. Noblit, G. W., Flores, S. Y., & Murillo, E. G. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  45. North, C. E. (2009). Teaching for social justice?: Voices from the front lines. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Pennell, S. M. (2016). Queering the curriculum: Critical literacy and numeracy for social justice (Doctoral dissertation), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Pennell, S., & Cain, J. M. (2016). Adorned: Moving from decoration to disposition in social justice. In J. Diem (Ed.) The social and cultural foundations of education: A reader (pp. 148–165). San Diego, CA: Cognella Academic Publishing. Google Scholar
  48. Plummer, K. (2005). Critical humanism and queer theory. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 357–373). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Rendón, L. I. (2009). Sentipensante (sensing/thinking) pedagogy: Educating for wholeness, social justice and liberation (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Talburt, S. (1999). Open secrets and problems of queer ethnography: Readings from a religious studies classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(5), 525–539.Google Scholar
  51. Terry, C. (2010). Prisons, pipelines, and the president: Developing critical math literacy through participatory action research. Journal of African American Males in Education, 1(2), 73–104.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, A. (2008). Community, culture, and citizenship in cyberspace. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 671–698). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum and Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  53. Turner, W. B. (2000). A genealogy of queer theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ukpokodu, O. N. (2011). How do I teach mathematics in a culturally responsive way? Identifying empowering teaching practices. Multicultural Education, 18(3), 47–56.Google Scholar
  55. Warnick, B. R., & Stemhagen, K. (2007). Mathematics teachers as moral educators: The implications of conceiving of mathematics as a technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(3), 303–316.Google Scholar
  56. Weems, L. (2007). Un/fixing the fiend: Queering pedagogy and dangerous desires. Educational Studies, 41(3), 194–211.Google Scholar
  57. Weiss, M. (2011). The epistemology of ethnography: Method in queer anthropology. GLQ, 17(4), 649–664.Google Scholar
  58. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (1998). Education for action: Preparing youth for participatory democracy. In W. Ayers, J. A. Hunt, & T. Quinn (Eds.), Teaching for social justice: A democracy and education reader (pp. 1–20). New York: Teachers College Press and The New Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Truman State UniversityKirksvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations