Advertisement

Telestroke and Neurocritical Care

  • Bart M. DemaerschalkEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes telestroke in its current state, including clinical applications, policies, guidelines, technical, and operational aspects of the telemedicine practice. Telestroke has expanded from early diagnosis to delivery of intravenous alteplase in rural emergency department settings, to involve a continuum of neurovascular services in mobile stroke units, intensive care units, medical-surgical wards, rehabilitation facilities, ambulatory stroke prevention clinics, patients’ homes, and in clinical research units. Health economic analyses of telestroke report cost-effectiveness from multiple payer perspectives. Monitoring and reporting of quality measures related to telestroke are prerequisites for stroke center accreditation and certification. Telestroke continues to bring neurovascular expertise to underserviced areas with advanced virtual telecommunication technologies, optimizing regional stroke care delivery. Future research may investigate whether comprehensive multidisciplinary seamless virtual telestroke centers could cover all aspects of stroke management from prehospital to acute care to reintegration into the community and beyond.

Keywords

Telestroke Telemedicine Stroke Emergency Critical care 

References

  1. 1.
    Demaerschalk BM, Berg J, Chong BW, Gross H, Nystrom K, Adeoye O, et al. American Telemedicine Association: Telestroke Guidelines. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23(5):376–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blacquiere D, Lindsay MP, Foley N, Taralson C, Alcock S, Balg C, et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Telestroke Best Practice Guidelines Update 2017. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(8):886–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mutgi SA, Zha AM, Behrouz R. Emerging Subspecialties in Neurology: Telestroke and teleneurology. Neurology. 2015;84(22):e191–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Norrving B, Mensah GA, et al. Stroke prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years in adults aged 20–64 years in 1990-2013: data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):190–202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):154–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amorim E, Shih MM, Koehler SA, Massaro LL, Zaidi SF, Jumaa MA, et al. Impact of telemedicine implementation in thrombolytic use for acute ischemic stroke: the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center telestroke network experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(4):527–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Opeolu MA, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(9):787–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agrawal K, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Claycomb RJ, Meyer DM, Hemmen TM, et al. Accuracy of Stroke Diagnosis in Telestroke-Guided Tissue Plasminogen Activator Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(12):2942–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Hoxworth JM, Patel AC, et al. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012;43(11):3095–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S, Bogdahn U, Wiedmann S, Heuschmann PU, et al. TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke. 2014;45(9):2739–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Audebert HJ, Wimmer ML, Hahn R, Schenkel J, Bogdahn U, Horn M, et al. Can telemedicine contribute to fulfill WHO Helsingborg Declaration of specialized stroke care? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(5):362–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanders KA, Patel R, Kiely JM, Gwynn MW, Johnston LH. Improving Telestroke Treatment Times in an Expanding Network of Hospitals. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(2):288–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S, Kuhn J, Vatankhah B, Schenkel J, et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke. 2005;36(2):287–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hubert GJ, Meretoja A, Audebert HJ, Tatlisumak T, Zeman F, Boy S, et al. Stroke Thrombolysis in a Centralized and a Decentralized System (Helsinki and Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care Network). Stroke. 2016;47(12):2999–3004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, Audebert HJ, Bakas T, Chumbler NR, et al. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2616–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwab S, Vatankhah B, Kukla C, Hauchwitz M, Bogdahn U, Furst A, et al. Long-term outcome after thrombolysis in telemedical stroke care. Neurology. 2007;69(9):898–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17B.
    Demaerschalk BM, Boyd EL, Barrett KM, Gamble DM, Sonchik S, Comer MM, et al. Comparison of stroke outcomes of hub and spoke hospital treated patients in mayo clinic telestroke program. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(11):2940–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    Wang S, Lee SB, Pardue C, Ramsingh D, Waller J, Gross H, et al. Remote evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: reliability of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale via telestroke. Stroke. 2003;34(10):e188–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    Demaerschalk BM, Vegunta S, Vargas BB, Wu Q, Channer DD, Hentz JG. Reliability of real-time video smartphone for assessing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3271–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, Dzialowski I, Kunz A, Wolz M, et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology. 2013;80(4):332–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD, et al. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill MD, Sevick RJ, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(8):1534–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    Smith EE, Schwamm LH. Endovascular clot retrieval therapy: implications for the organization of stroke systems of care in North America. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1462–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    Pedragosa A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Rubiera M, Rodriguez-Luna D, Maisterra O, Molina C, et al. Impact of telemedicine on acute management of stroke patients undergoing endovascular procedures. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(5–6):436–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 26.
    Kepplinger J, Dzialowski I, Barlinn K, Puetz V, Wojciechowski C, Schneider H, et al. Emergency transfer of acute stroke patients within the East Saxony telemedicine stroke network: a descriptive analysis. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(2):160–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 27.
    Barlinn J, Gerber J, Barlinn K, Pallesen LP, Siepmann T, Zerna C, et al. Acute endovascular treatment delivery to ischemic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a retrospective observational study. Int J Stroke. 2016;12(5):502–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28.
    Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, Adeoye OM, Audebert HJ, Fanale CV, et al. Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke: a Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48(1):e3–e25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 29.
    Backhaus R, Schlachetzki F, Rackl W, Baldaranov D, Leitzmann M, Hubert GJ, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage: frequency, location, and risk factors identified in a TeleStroke network. Neuroreport. 2015;26(2):81–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    Yaghi S, Rayaz S, Bianchi N, Hall-Barrow JC, Hinduja A. Thrombolysis to stroke mimics in telestroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2012.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Ali SF, Viswanathan A, Singhal AB, Rost NS, Forducey PG, Davis LW, et al. The TeleStroke mimic (TM)-score: a prediction rule for identifying stroke mimics evaluated in a Telestroke Network. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(3):e000838.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    Mackay MT, Churilov L, Donnan GA, Babl FE, Monagle P. Performance of bedside stroke recognition tools in discriminating childhood stroke from mimics. Neurology. 2016;86(23):2154–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, Fugate JE, Grotta JC, et al. Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(2):581–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    Van Hooff RJ, Cambron M, Van Dyck R, De Smedt A, Moens M, Espinoza AV, et al. Prehospital unassisted assessment of stroke severity using telemedicine: a feasibility study. Stroke. 2013;44(10):2907–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 35.
    Walter S, Kostopoulos P, Haass A, Keller I, Lesmeister M, Schlechtriemen T, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke in a mobile stroke unit versus in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(5):397–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 36.
    Kunz A, Ebinger M, Geisler F, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE, et al. Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1035–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 37.
    Ebinger M, Kunz A, Wendt M, Rozanski M, Winter B, Waldschmidt C, et al. Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(1):25–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 38.
    Wu TC, Parker SA, Jagolino A, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Thomas A, et al. Telemedicine Can Replace the Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2017;48(2):493–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 39.
    Vespa PM, Miller C, Hu X, Nenov V, Buxey F, Martin NA. Intensive care unit robotic telepresence facilitates rapid physician response to unstable patients and decreased cost in neurointensive care. Surg Neurol. 2007;67(4):331–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 40.
    Klein KE, Rasmussen PA, Winners SL, Frontera JA. Teleneurocritical care and telestroke. Crit Care Clin. 2015;31(2):197–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 41.
    Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD010255.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, Xu W, Liu XN, Ren CC. Telerehabilitation Approaches for Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(12):2660–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 43.
    Rubin MN, Barrett KM, Freeman WD, Lee Iannotti JK, Channer DD, Rabinstein AA, et al. Teleneurosonology: a novel application of transcranial and carotid ultrasound. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(3):562–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 44.
    Switzer JA, Hall CE, Close B, Nichols FT, Gross H, Bruno A, et al. A telestroke network enhances recruitment into acute stroke clinical trials. Stroke. 2010;41(3):566–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 45.
    Lin MP, Sanossian N, Liebeskind DS. Imaging of prehospital stroke therapeutics. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(9):1001–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 46.
    Kramer NM, Demaerschalk BM. A novel application of teleneurology: robotic telepresence in supervision of neurology trainees. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(12):1087–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 47.
    Jagolino AL, Jia J, Gildersleeve K, Ankrom C, Cai C, Rahbar M, et al. A call for formal telemedicine training during stroke fellowship. Neurology. 2016;86(19):1827–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 48.
    Richard S, Mione G, Varoqui C, Vezain A, Brunner A, Bracard S, et al. Simulation training for emergency teams to manage acute ischemic stroke by telemedicine. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(24):e3924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 49.
    Rafter RH, Kelly TM. Nursing implementation of a telestroke programme in a community hospital in the US. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(2):193–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 50.
    Hess DC, Audebert HJ. The history and future of telestroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(6):340–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 51.
    Audebert H. Telestroke: effective networking. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(3):279–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 52.
    Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, Chumbler NR, Frankel MR, George MG, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2635–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 53.
    Rogove HJ, McArthur D, Demaerschalk BM, Vespa PM. Barriers to telemedicine: survey of current users in acute care units. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(1):48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 54.
    Kulcsar M, Gilchrist S, George MG. Improving stroke outcomes in rural areas through telestroke programs: an examination of barriers, facilitators, and state policies. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(1):3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 55.
    Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(1):18–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 56.
    Nelson RE, Okon N, Lesko AC, Majersik JJ, Bhatt A, Baraban E. The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the Pacific Northwest region of the USA. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(7):413–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 57.
    Demaerschalk BM, Switzer JA, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(12):976–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 58.
    Sharma S, Padma MV, Bhardwaj A, Sharma A, Sawal N, Thakur S. Telestroke in resource-poor developing country model. Neurol India. 2016;64(5):934–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 59.
    Lippman JM, Smith SN, McMurry TL, Sutton ZG, Gunnell BS, Cote J, et al. Mobile Telestroke During Ambulance Transport Is Feasible in a Rural EMS Setting: the iTREAT Study. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(6):507–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 60.
    Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen KR, Bollweg K, Kronborg C, Ebinger M, Audebert HJ. Cost-effectiveness estimate of prehospital thrombolysis: results of the PHANTOM-S study. Neurology. 2015;84(11):1090–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 61.
    Belt GH, Felberg RA, Rubin J, Halperin JJ. In-Transit Telemedicine Speeds Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Preliminary Results. Stroke. 2016;47(9):2413–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 62.
    Demaerschalk BM. Seamless integrated stroke telemedicine systems of care: a potential solution for acute stroke care delivery delays and inefficiencies. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1507–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 63.
    Shuaib A, Khan K, Whittaker T, Amlani S, Crumley P. Introduction of portable computed tomography scanners, in the treatment of acute stroke patients via telemedicine in remote communities. Int J Stroke. 2010;5(2):62–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 64.
    Demeestere J, Sewell C, Rudd J, Ang T, Jordan L, Wills J, et al. The establishment of a telestroke service using multimodal CT imaging decision assistance: "Turning on the fog lights". J Clin Neurosci. 2017;37:1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 65.
    Muller-Barna P, Audebert HJ. High-standard TeleStroke: need for experienced stroke experts trained in imaging interpretation. Neurology. 2013;80(4):326–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 66.
    Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 67.
    Malandraki GA, McCullough G, He X, McWeeny E, Perlman AL. Teledynamic evaluation of oropharyngeal swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(6):1497–505.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 68.
    Rubin MN, Wellik KE, Channer DD, Demaerschalk BM. Systematic review of telestroke for post-stroke care and rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013;15(8):343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 69.
    Alberts MJ, Latchaw RE, Selman WR, Shephard T, Hadley MN, Brass LM, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1597–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and ScienceRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations