Advertisement

Marxism, Pragmatism, and Postcritique

  • Ulf Schulenberg
Chapter

Abstract

Chapters 6 and 7 ought to be studied together since both deal with the critique of the idea of a coherent dramatic narrative. One of the most stimulating discussions in literary and cultural studies in the past years has been the one centering on the necessity of developing forms of “postcritique.” In this chapter, Schulenberg demonstrates that his discussion of the relation between Marxism and pragmatism also plays a role concerning this critique of critique. He discusses the postcritics’ analysis of Fredric Jameson’s Hegelian Marxism. Furthermore, it is argued that the works of these critics suffer from their almost complete neglect of Richard Rorty’s and Jacques Rancière’s versions of horizontal critique. Finally, Schulenberg’s overall goal in this chapter is to show that a discussion of postcritique contributes to one’s understanding of the idea of horizontal intellectual progress, and thus to one’s appreciation of the implications of the idea of a genuinely nominalist and historicist culture.

Bibliography

  1. Anker, E. S., & Felski, R. (Eds.). (2017). Critique and Postcritique. Durham, NC: Duke UP.Google Scholar
  2. Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface Reading: An Introduction. Representations, 108, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eribon, Didier (2013). Returning to Reims (M. Lucey, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  4. Felski, R. (2015). The Limits of Critique. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. James, W. (1907). Pragmatism and Other Writings (G. Gunn, Ed. & with an Introduction). New York: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Jameson, F. (1971). Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  7. Jameson, F. (1988). The Ideologies of Theory: Essays, 1971–1986, Vol 2: Syntax of History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Jameson, F. (1989). The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. 1981. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Jameson, F. (1992). Signatures of the Visible. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kolakowski, L. (2005). Main Currents of Marxism (P. S. Falla, Trans.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Latour, B. (2004). Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?: From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Love, H. (2010). Close But Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn. New Literary History, 41, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Rorty, R. (2016). Philosophy as Poetry. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulf Schulenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations