Advertisement

Integrating Self-Determination and Self-Efficacy in Game Design

  • Hossein JamshidifarsaniEmail author
  • Paul Tamayo-Serrano
  • Samir Garbaya
  • Theodore Lim
  • Pierre Blazevic
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11385)

Abstract

Video games have been known to increase the levels of player’s motivation. This initiated the emergence of serious games and gamification to exploit game elements and mechanics for increasing the motivation in non-game contexts. The research reported in this paper used psychological theories of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Self-Efficacy Theory (SET) to design three versions of a game. The first version was based on SDT, the second on SET and the third version was based on a combination of these two theories. The objective is to investigate the impact of each game design on the user motivation and performance. An experiment of playing the games designed with these features was conducted. Surprisingly, the results on the objective evaluation revealed that there is no significant difference among the groups in terms of engagement and performance. Furthermore, these findings were confirmed by the results on the subjective evaluation of player’s perceived motivation, which showed no significant difference between the three experimental conditions.

Keywords

Self-determination Self-efficacy Game design Motivation Engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research has been conducted with the financial support of the European Union through the Beaconing project (Horizon 2020-Grant Number 687676). The authors acknowledge the financial support of the EU, Hands-Free Computing Ltd and the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT).

References

  1. 1.
    Szczypka, M.S., et al.: Feeding behavior in dopamine-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96(21), 12138–12143 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 68–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. In: Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (eds.) Handbook of Self-Determination Research, pp. 3–33. University of Rochester Press, Rochester (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Can. Psychol. 49(3), 182–185 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84(2), 191–215 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sweet, S.N., Fortier, M.S., Strachan, S.M., Blanchard, C.M.: Testing and integrating self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory in a physical activity context. Can. Psychol. 53(4), 319–327 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Comput. Entertain. 1(1), 20 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30(4), 347–363 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., Dixon, D.: Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2011, p. 2425 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining ‘gamification’. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2011, p. 2425 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games: an overview (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer, Boston (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the delf-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11(4), 227–268 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bong, M., Clark, R.E.: Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educ. Psychol. 34(3), 139–153 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Techatassanasoontorn, A.A.: The integrated self-determination and self-efficacy theories of ICT training and use: the case of the socio-economically disadvantaged. In: Development (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sweet, S.N., Fortier, M.S., Strachan, S.M., Blanchard, C.M., Boulay, P.: Testing a longitudinal integrated self-efficacy and self-determination theory model for physical activity post-cardiac rehabilitation. Heal. Psychol. Res. 2(1), 1008 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng, W., Lin, J.H., Pfeiffer, K.A., Winn, B.: Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: an experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychol. 15(2), 175–196 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Francisco-Aparicio, A., Gutiérrez-Vela, F.L., Isla-Montes, J.L., Sanchez, J.L.G.: Gamification: analysis and application. In: Penichet, V., Peñalver, A., Gallud, J. (eds.) New Trends in Interaction, Virtual Reality and Modeling. HCIS, pp. 113–126. Springer, London (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5445-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Proulx, J.N., Romero, M., Arnab, S.: Learning mechanics and game mechanics under the perspective of self-determination theory to foster motivation in digital game based learning. Simul. Gaming 48(1), 81–97 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arnab, S., et al.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis: mapping learning and game mechanics. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 5, 19 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Arnab, S., De Freitas, S., Louchart, S.: The LM-GM framework for serious games analysis (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richter, G., Raban, D.R., Rafaeli, S.: Studying gamification: the effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (eds.) Gamification in Education and Business, pp. 21–46. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Unity: Lets Make a Game: Infinite Runner. Unity Tutorials (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Blanchard, C.: On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motiv. Emot. 24(3), 175–213 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.END-ICAP Laboratory - INSERM, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - Paris-SaclayVersaillesFrance
  2. 2.END-ICAP Laboratory - INSERM, ENSAM, Arts et Métiers ParisTechParisFrance
  3. 3.Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations