Mini-roundabouts for Improving Urban Accessibility

  • Antonio PratelliEmail author
  • Marino Lupi
  • Chiara Pratelli
  • Alessandro Farina
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)


Mini-roundabouts belong to a specific class of the so-called modern roundabouts. As their name states, they have smaller geometric features than single lane standards roundabouts. Moreover, the inner central island of a mini roundabout is often surmountable or semi-surmountable by heavy vehicles engaged in left turning maneuvers. The field of application of the mini roundabouts is not very wide, usually it is restricted to the urban area. This is essentially due to their reduced geometric characteristics, and for this reason they are more effective where traffic flows have lower speeds and volumes. Nevertheless, mini roundabouts play an important role in traffic network design because the number of intersections is much higher in any urban area than in a rural one. From a general point of view, the advantages attained by a mini roundabout can be summarized in the road safety upgrade by lowering of vehicle speeds, the reduction of delays and queues, the road space general improvement and a better perception of intersection in the environment. Frequently, mini roundabouts might be applied to instances also well suited to be coped with single lane roundabouts, even if they differ from these last, both for lower construction costs, and lesser need of road surface. Therefore, a mini roundabout is better suitable and more efficient in an urban area, especially in a residential one, when some basic condition are matched: low traffic volumes and speeds, single lane converging roads, reduced intersection surface, few heavy vehicles, i.e. lorries and buses. The mini roundabout design must take into account the above requirements since planning operation through feasibility checks of basic warrants. High attention should also paid to requirements due to the limited tolerances imposed by geometry. Today, any designer has at his disposal and help the guidelines of many countries in the world report, in a more or less in-depth way, the design standards of the mini roundabouts. As always, it is clear that it is not enough to have good guidelines if you do not have the right knowledge to apply them. This document would aim to make an organic contribution to the knowledge improvement and practical planning and design of mini roundabouts.


Mini-roundabout characteristics and geometry Planning and design guidelines Traffic calming and urban areas Examples of mini-roundabouts 


  1. 1.
    Austroads (2013) Improving the performance of safe system infrastructure: stage 1. AP-T256-13. SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binning JC (2000) Assessment of roundabout capacity and delay ARCADY 5 used guide. Transportation Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodé C, Maunsell F (2006) Mini-roundabouts: enabling good practice. Association for European Transport and ContributorsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodé C, Maunsell F (2007) TD 54/07 design of mini-roundabouts. Design manual for roads and bridges. Volume 6, Road geometry. Section 2, Junctions. Part 2. Department for Transport, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brilon W (2005) Roundabouts: a state of the art in Germany. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board international conference on roundabouts, VailGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brilon W (2011) Studies on roundabouts in Germany: lessons learned. Paper presented at the 3rd international TRB-roundabout conference, Indianapolis, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brilon W, Bondzio L (1999) Untersuchung von Mini-Kreisverkehrsplatzen. Final report to the State DOT Northrhine-Westphalia, Ruhr-University BochumGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Candappa N, Logan D, Van Nes N, Corben B (2015) An exploration of alternative intersection designs in the context of safe system. Accid Anal Prev 74:314–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    CERTU - Centre d’études sur les réseaux, les transports, l’urbanisme et les constructions publique (1999) Guide Carrefours urbains, Ministère de l’Équipement, des Transports et du Logement, Lyon (France) [In French: Center for studies on networks, transport, urban planning and public construction]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CERTU (2009) Les accidents dans les carrefours giratoires urbains. Étude statistique de 1993 à 2005, Lyon [In French: Accidents in urban roundabouts]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    CERTU (2010) Carrefours urbains, Lyon, France.
  12. 12.
    Cicu F, Illotta P, Bared J, Isebrands H (2011) VISSIM calibration of roundabouts traffic performances. In: 90th Transportation Research Board annual meeting, TRB, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    CIE - Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (1995) Recommendations for the lighting of roads for motor and pedestrian traffic. Report n. 115/95Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Toulouse M (2007) Évaluation des mini-giratoires - CERTU [In French: Evaluation of mini-roundabouts]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Department for Transport and the County Surveyors Society (2009) Mini roundabouts, good practice guidance. Department for Transport, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emslie I (1997) Design guidelines for mini-roundabouts CR-97/039. Department of Transport and Road Technology, Pretoria (South Africa)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Federal Highway Administration (2010) Mini-roundabouts: technical summary. Report No FHWA-SA-10-007, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gazzarri A, Pratelli A, Martello M, Souleyrette R (2012) Estimation of gap acceptance parameters for HCM 2010 roundabout capacity model applications. In: Longhurst JWS, Brebbia CA (eds) WIT transactions on the built environment, vol 128, pp 309–320Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IES - Illuminating Engineering Society (2008) Design guide for roundabout lighting. Publication IES DG-19-08. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ITE (1982) Transportation and traffic engineering handbook, 2nd edn. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kennedy JV, Hall RD, Barnard SR (1998) TRL report 281 accidents at urban mini-roundabouts. Transport Research Laboratory, CrowthorneGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Legac I, Pilko H, Šubić N (2010) Introduction of roundabouts in Croatia—preliminary experiences. In: Proceedings of “Sharing the road” 16th IRF world meeting, Lisbon, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lochrane T, Zhang W, Bared J (2012) Mini-roundabouts for the United States and traffic capacity models. Inst Transp Eng J 82(11):20–24Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Macioszek E, Akcelik R, Sierpinski G (eds) (2018) Roundabouts as safe and modern solutions in transport networks and systems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    NTA—National Transport Authority (2011) The national cycle manual.
  26. 26.
    NCHRP Report 672 (2010) Roundabouts: an informational guide, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pilko H, Mandzuka S, Baric D (2017) Urban single-lane roundabouts: a new analytical approach using multi-criteria and simultaneous multi-objective optimization of geometry design, efficiency and safety. Transp Res Part C 80:257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pratelli A (2006) Design of modern roundabouts in urban traffic systems. Urban transport and environment in 21th century. WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, pp 83–93Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pratelli A (2007) Setting for compact roundabout optimal lighting plans. In: Urban transport XIII. Urban transport and the environment in the 21st century, vol 96. WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, pp 461–470Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pratelli A, Souleyrette RR (2009) Visibility, perception and roundabout safety. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Urban transport and the environment in the 21st century, vol 107. WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, pp 577–588Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rice E (2010) Technical summary: mini-roundabouts. United States Department of Transport, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rodegerdts L et al (2007) Roundabouts in the United State. NCHRP report 572, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowan NJ, Walton NE (1982) Lighting of traffic facilities. In: Homburger WS (ed) Transportation and traffic engineering handbook. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 627–644Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scatena P (2004) Study of roundabout lighting systems according to road safety. Master thesis 2003/2004, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pisa (in Italian)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    SN 640263—Swiss Standards (2000) Carrefours giratories. VSS, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    South Africa Department of Transport (1997) Design guidelines for mini-roundabouts. Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Šurdonja S, Babić S, Deluka-Tibljaš A, Cuculić M (2012) Mini-roundabouts in urban areas. In: Proceedings of CETRA2012 2nd international conference on road and rail infrastructures, 7–9 May 2012, DubrovnikGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Todd K (1988) A history of roundabouts in the United States and France. Transp Q 42(4):599–623Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tollazzi T (2015) Alternative types of roundabouts—an informational guide. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tollazzi T, Sram M, Lerher T (2008) Roundabout arm capacity determined by microsimulation and discrete functions technique. Promet Traffic Transp 20(5):291–300Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    TRB (2010) Highway capacity manual, 5th edn. Transportation Research Board, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
    UNI EN 10819—light and lighting—outdoor lighting installations—requirements for limiting the upward dispersion of the light flowGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    United States Access Board (2004) ADA accessibility guidelines (ADAAG). U.S. Access Board, Washington.
  45. 45.
    VISSIM (2011) Version 5-40-01 user manual. PTV America, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    VSS (1991) Guide Suisse des Giratoires, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zito R, Taylor MAP (1996) Speed profiles and vehicle fuel consumption at LATM devices. In: 18th AARB transport research conference, New ZealandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Pratelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marino Lupi
    • 1
  • Chiara Pratelli
    • 1
  • Alessandro Farina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations