Advertisement

Mortmain: Manor Culture and Material Immortality

  • Tora HolmbergEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates what it means to own and live in a manor when its use can be dictated to following generations many years after the death of the testator. The key trope for understanding this intergenerational dependence is that of “mortmain,” a juridical and cultural arrangement with an ancient European history. Former generations act far beyond the juridical inheritance arrangements, and through the manor and its emplaced family tradition and expectations, they influence present as well as future inhabitants. Developing the frame on symbolic as well as material aspects of kinship, place and class reproduction, this chapter suggests “material immortality” as a trope for understanding the effects of mortmain in rural upper-class culture—the prospect to live on beyond ones’ own death.

Keywords

Upper class Place attachment Material actor Dwelling Value Dead Moral Fideicommissum 

References

  1. Alexander, J. C. (2004) ‘Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy’, Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. and Smith, P. (2003) ‘The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology’ in J. C. Alexander (ed.) The Meanings of Social Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C., Lund, A. and Trondman, M. (2011) Kulturell Sociologi. Program, Teori och Praktik, Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  4. Baltzell, E. D. (1958) Philadelphia Gentlemen. The Making of National Upper Class, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. de Blij, H. (2008) The Power of Place. Geography, Destiny, and Globalization’s Rough Landscape, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E. (eds.) (1986) Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Duyvendak, J. W. (2011) The Politics of Home. Belonging and Nostalgia in Europe and the United States, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Easthope, H. (2004) ‘A Place Called Home’, Housing, Theory & Society, 21(3), 128–138.Google Scholar
  11. Elias, N. (1985) The Loneliness of the Dying, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, M. (2009) Objects of the Dead, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gods & Gårdar. (2016a) Bonnier Tidskrifter AB, February, no. 2.Google Scholar
  14. Gods & Gårdar. (2016b) Bonnier Tidskrifter AB, July, no. 7.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, A. (2008) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time, London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hennion, A. (2007) ‘Those Things that Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology’, Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97–114.Google Scholar
  19. Holmberg, T. (2017) ‘Herrgårdens Värde. Förvaltning som Livsstil’, Bebyggelsehistorisk Tidskrift, 35(74), 100–115.Google Scholar
  20. Holmberg, T. (2018) ‘Eliters Boende på Slott och Herrgårdar’ in B. E. Eriksson, M. Holmqvist, and L. Sohl (eds.) Eliter i Sverige, Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  21. Holmqvist, M. (2015) Djursholm, Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
  22. Lamont, M. (1992) Money, Morals, & Manners. The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lamont, M. and Fournier, M. (1992) Cultivating Differences, Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Mitford, N. (ed.) (1956) Noblesse Oblige: An Enquiry into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  26. Ostrander, S. A. (1984) Women of the Upper Class, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Regeringens Proposition. (1999) ‘Kulturarv—Kulturmiljöer och Kulturföremål’: 1998/99:114.Google Scholar
  28. Shneidman, E. (2008) A Commonsense Book of Death. Reflections at Ninety of a Lifelong Thanatologist, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. SVT. (2012) ‘Brittiska aristokrater’, BBC.Google Scholar
  30. Swidler, A. (1986) ‘Culture in Action. Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.Google Scholar
  31. Ulväng, G. (2008) Herrgårdarnas Historia. Arbete, Liv och Bebyggelse på Uppländska Herrgårdar, Halmstad: Hallgren & Björklund.Google Scholar
  32. Valentine, C. (2008) Bereavement Narratives. Continuing Bonds in the Twenty-First Century, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations