Advertisement

Perspectives on Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Life-Cycle Assessment

  • Luis C. DiasEmail author
  • Fausto Freire
  • Jutta Geldermann
Chapter
Part of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making book series (MCDM)

Abstract

This chapter covers the combined use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and Life-Cycle Assessment methodologies. It first reviews environmental Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA), introduces the main challenges and perspectives, including how to extend LCA towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), and discusses how LCAs might be useful for the MCDA practitioner. Then, it discusses how MCDA can complement LCA. Challenges and perspectives are presented concerning LCSA, relative versus absolute evaluation, criteria weighting, and criteria selection.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out in the framework of the Energy for Sustainability Initiative (EfS) of the University of Coimbra (UC), Portugal, and the MIT-Portugal Program, and was co-funded by FEDER and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through projects SABIOS (PTDC/AAG-MAA/6234/2014), STREAMLAB (MIT-EXPL/SUS/0013/2017) and SET-LCA (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-030570).

References

  1. Atherton, E., & French, S. (1999). Structuring Long-Term Decisions. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 1, 213–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azapagic, A., & Clift, R. (1999). The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23, 1509–1526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00308-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudry, G., Macharis, C., & Vallée, T. (2018). Range-based multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: A combined method of multi-actor multi-criteria analysis and monte carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 264, 257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Koudijs, H. G., & Vis, J. C. (1995). Environmental impacts of fat blends. Environmental & Resource Economics, 6, 371–387.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castanheira, É. G., Grisoli, R., Coelho, S., et al. (2015). Life-cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Europe: Comparing grain, oil and biodiesel import from Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 188–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.04.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dias, L. C., & Domingues, A. R. (2014). On multi-criteria sustainability assessment: Spider-gram surface and dependence biases. Applied Energy, 113, 159–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dias, L. C., & Mousseau, V. (2018). Eliciting multi-criteria preferences: ELECTRE models. In L. C. Dias, A. Morton, & J. Quigley (Eds.), Elicitation—The science and art of structuring judgement (pp. 349–375).Google Scholar
  9. Dias, L. C., Passeira, C., Malça, J., & Freire, F. (2016). Integrating life-cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis to compare alternative biodiesel chains. The Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2329-7.
  10. Dias, L. C., Silva, S., & Alcada-Almeida, L. (2015). Multi-criteria environmental performance assessment with an additive model. In Handbook on methods and applications in environmental studies.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474646.
  11. Domingues, A. R., Marques, P., Garcia, R., et al. (2015). Applying multi-criteria decision analysis to the life-cycle assessment of vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 749–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du, C. (2017). Environmental and social sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil: comparing manual and mechanical harvesting. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Coimbra.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2003). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament, integrated product policy—Building on environmental life-cycle thinking.Google Scholar
  14. French, S. (1995). Uncertainty and Imprecision: Modelling and Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1995.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. French, S., & Geldermann, J. (2005). The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 378–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geldermann, J., & Rentz, O. (2005). Multi-criteria analysis for technique assessment: Case study from industrial coating. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., & Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis—State of the art surveys. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guinée, J. (2016). Life cycle sustainability assessment: What is it and what are its challenges? In: Taking stock of industrial ecology (pp. 45–68). Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
  19. Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., et al. (2011). Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guitouni, A., & Martel, J.-M. (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 109, 501–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00073-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heijungs, R., Guinée, J., Huppes, G., et al. (1992). Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide. Report No. 9266. CML, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  22. Hertwich, E., & Hammitt, J. K. (2001). A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment. Part I: LCA and decision analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5–12.Google Scholar
  23. Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2001). Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  25. ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobi, S. K., & Hobbs, B. F. (2007). Quantifying and mitigating the splitting bias and other value tree-induced weighting biases. Decision Analysis, 4, 194–210.  https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1070.0100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 89–95.  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., & Hokkanen, J. (2000). Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 26, 595–605.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lerche, N., Wilkens, I., Schmehl, M., et al. (2017). Using methods of multi-criteria decision making to provide decision support concerning local bioenergy projects. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.08.002.
  31. Martín-Gamboa, M., Iribarren, D., García-Gusano, D., & Dufour, J. (2017). A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 164–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marttunen, M., Lienert, J., & Belton, V. (2017). Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. European Journal of Operational Research, 263, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miettinen, P., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1997). How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 279–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00109-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Millet, I., & Saaty, T. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures—Accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 205–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00040-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morton, A. (2018). Multiattribute value elicitation. In L. C. Dias, A. Morton, & J. Quigley (Eds.), Elicitation: The science and art structure judgement (pp. 287–311). Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
  36. Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myllyviita, T., Leskinen, P., & Seppälä, J. (2014). Impact of normalisation, elicitation technique and background information on panel weighting results in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 377–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0645-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neves, L. P., Dias, L. C., Antunes, C. H., & Martins, A. G. (2009). Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: A case study in energy efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 199, 834–845.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ormerod, R. J. (2014). OR competences: The demands of problem structuring methods. EURO Journal of Decision Processes, 2, 313–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0021-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pizzol, M., Laurent, A., Sala, S., Weidema, B., Verones, F., & Koffler, C. (2017). Normalisation and weighting in life cycle assessment: quo vadis? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(6), 853–866.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1199-1.
  41. Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360, 987–992.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prado-Lopez, V., Seager, T. P., Chester, M., et al. (2014). Stochastic multi-attribute analysis (SMAA) as an interpretation method for comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0641-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Renn, O., Blättel-Mink, B., & Kastenholz, H. (1997). Discursive methods in environmental decision making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6, 218–231.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:4%3c218:AID-BSE117%3e3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal of Decision Processes, 1, 69–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0004-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seppala, J., Basson, L., Norris, G. A., et al. (2002). Frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slotte, S., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2015). Decision structuring dialogue. EURO Journal of Decision Processes, 3, 141–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-014-0028-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soares, S. R., Toffoletto, L., & Deschênes, L. (2006). Development of weighting factors in the context of LCIA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 649–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spengler, T., Geldermann, J., Hähre, S., et al. (1998). Development of a multiple criteria based decision support system for environmental assessment of recycling measures in the iron and steel making industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, 37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00048-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stirling, A. (2006). Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy, 23, 95–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thore, S., & Freire, F. (2002). Ranking the performance of producers in the presence of environmental goals. Technology and commerce (pp. 363–384). US, Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Tuomisto, H. L., Hodge, I. D., Riordan, P., & Macdonald, D. W. (2012). Exploring a safe operating approach to weighting in life cycle impact assessment—A case study of organic, conventional and integrated farming systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 147–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.06.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. UNEP SETAC. (2016). Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators (Vol. 1). Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, Y.-M., & Luo, Y. (2009). On rank reversal in decision analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49, 1221–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MCM.2008.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zanghelini, G. M., Cherubini, E., & Soares, S. R. (2018). How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 609–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.10.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis C. Dias
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fausto Freire
    • 2
  • Jutta Geldermann
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics, CeBER and INESC CoimbraUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.ADAI-LAETA, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations