Advertisement

Experimental Investigation of Pedestrian Queuing Behaviour

  • Jiahua ZhangEmail author
  • Miho Iryo-Asano
  • Charitha Dias
Conference paper

Abstract

One key aspect of pedestrian dynamics is the pedestrian queuing behaviour particularly in front of bottlenecks. As previous studies have highlighted, features of pedestrian queues in front of different types of bottlenecks are considerably dissimilar. Insights into similarities and differences of pedestrian queuing behaviour for typical bottlenecks can be important for the planning and design of public walking space. However, no sufficient empirical studies have been carried out so far to examine the diversity of pedestrian queuing behaviour. In this study, a series of experiments were performed to explore the characteristics of pedestrian queue formations under different conditions.

As the results suggest, pedestrians tend to form organized queues before bottlenecks with a clear pass control (e.g., service counters where only one person can be served once). Wider bottlenecks, capacity reductions and low service rates were found to motivate pedestrians to merge or overtake in the upstream of the bottleneck.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, for providing the experimental spaces.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, X., Ye, J., Jian, N.: Relationships and characteristics of pedestrian traffic flow in confined passageways. J. Transp. Res. Board 2198, 32–40 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheung, C., Lam, W.H.: Pedestrian route choices between escalator and stairway in MTR stations. J. Transp. Eng. 124(3), 277–285 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daly, P., McGrath, F., Annesley, T.: Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for underground stations. Traffic Eng. Control 32(2), 75–78 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407(6803), 487–490 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, I., Galiza, R., Ferreira, L.: Modeling pedestrian queuing using micro-simulation. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 49, 232–240 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kneidl, A.: How do people queue? A study of different queuing models. In: Traffic and Granular Flow’15, pp. 201–208. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Köster, G., Zönnchen, B.: Queuing at bottlenecks using a dynamic floor field for navigation. Transp. Res. Proc. 2, 344–352 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okazaki, S., Matsushita, S.: A study of simulation model for pedestrian movement with evacuation and queuing. In: International Conference on Engineering for Crowd Safety, vol. 271 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seyfried, A., Passon, O., Steffen, B., Boltes, M., Rupprecht, T., Klingsch, W.: New insights into pedestrian flow through bottlenecks. Transp. Sci. 43(3), 395–406 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaha, J., Joshi, G., Parida, P.: Behavioral characteristics of pedestrian flow on stairway at railway station. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 104, 688–697 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suzuki, K., Nakamura, H.: Trafficanalyzer-the integrated video image processing system for traffic flow analysis. In: Proceedings of the 13th Its World Congress, London, 8–12 October 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasufuku, K.: Reproduction of pedestrian movement in queue by using multi-agent system and analysis of crowd flow affected by following behavior. J. Archit. Plann. 81(722), 821–829 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye, J., Chen, X., Yang, C., Wu, J.: Walking behavior and pedestrian flow characteristics for different types of walking facilities. J. Transp. Res. Board 2048, 43–51 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zheng, X., Li, H.Y., Meng, L.Y., Xu, X.Y., Yang, Y.H.: Simulating queuing behaviour of pedestrians in subway stations. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, pp. 1–8. Thomas Telford Ltd., London (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Engineering and ArchitectureNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Institute of Industrial ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations