Towards a More Stable Traffic Flow Performance: Applying and Calibrating the Intelligent Driver Model

  • Dong PanEmail author
  • Samer H. Hamder
  • Antonio J. Caamaño
Conference paper


The surrounding conditions (e.g., weather condition) under which a roadway segment operates may affect its performance, impairing its capacity level and consequently resulting into the formulation and propagation of congestion. In this study, we translated the traffic data from continuous count station (CCS, administrated by Virginia Department of Transportation—VDOT) in Northern Virginia into fundamental diagrams (FDs). By overlapping such data with weather data (available on Weather Channel), two travel condition types were defined, namely normal commute condition and inclement weather condition. The conditional FDs indicate a significant decrease in capacity under inclement weather condition compared to normal commute condition. To reveal the underlying factors leading to such capacity decrease, we obtained the parameters from intelligent driver model (IDM, as the car-following algorithm) and minimizing overall braking induced by lane changes (MOBIL, as the lane-changing algorithm), trained with real traffic data to simulate multilane behavior and weather conditions, adjusted to match the characteristics in the capacity breakdown situations. It is found that reaction time will affect the capacity level at a location of roadway and thus the congestion formulation while the lane-changing will influence the traveling of shock waves over a length of roadway and thus the congestion propagation.


  1. 1.
    Saifuzzaman, M., Zheng, Z.: Incorporating human-factors in car-following models: a review of recent developments and research needs. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 48, 379–403 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gazis, D.C., Herman, R., Rothery, R.W.: Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 9(4), 545–567 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newell, G.F.: Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Oper. Res. 9(2), 209–229 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gipps, P.G.: A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 15(2), 105–111 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 62(2), 1805 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Helbing, D.: General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1999, 86–94 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Helbing, D.: Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368(1928), 4585–4605 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Persaud, B.N., Hall, F.L.: Catastrophe theory and patterns in 30-second freeway traffic data—implications for incident detection. Transp. Res. A Gen. 23(2), 103–113 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Pan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samer H. Hamder
    • 2
  • Antonio J. Caamaño
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorge Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.George Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Rey Juan Carlos UniversityMóstolesSpain

Personalised recommendations