GE-government: A Geographic Information Based E-government Citizens’ Adoption Framework

  • Hassan K. Dennaoui
  • Angelika I. KokkinakiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)


The research aim is to investigate the Geographic Information (GI) influence on e-government adoption by citizens and introduce the GI based E-government citizens’ adoption framework (GE-government). A thorough literature review was executed examining how GI is relevant to E-government services and identify the GI aspects that may affect e-government adoption by citizens. The literature review showed no evidence of any published e-government model considering GI as an independent factor having impact on e-government citizens’ adoption. Moreover, it identified the most common E-government adoption influential factors. We studied the GI impact through the GE-government adoption model by assessing its significant influence. The research findings offered an additional value supporting the E-government’s implementers in enhancing the E-government citizens’ adoption. This paper proposes a factor that could affect E-government adoption modelling and has not been identified in the literature, so far. The paper concludes with a proposed framework and outlines future research.


Geographic information Geographic information system Digital government E-government E-services Adoption 


  1. 1.
    Abu Nadi, I.K. Sanzogni, L. Sandhu, K., Woods, P.: Success factors contributing to E-government adoption in Saudi Arabia. SIIC J. (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akkaya, C., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: A comprehensive analysis of E-government adoption in the german household. In: 11th International Conference on Wirtschafts informatik, 27th February – 01st March 2013, Leipzig, Germany (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al Awadhi, S., Morris, A.: Factors influencing the adoption of E-government services. J. Softw. 4, 584–590 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al Hujran, O., Aloudat, A., Altarawneh, I.: Factors influencing citizen adoption of E- government in developing countries: the case of jordan. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. 9(2), 1–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alateyah, S.A., Crowder, R.M., Wills, G.B.: Identified factors affecting the citizen’s intention to adopt E-government in Saudi Arabia. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Soc. Bus. Psychol. Hum. Sci. Eng. 7(8), 244–252 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alghamdi, S., Beloff, N.: Innovative framework for E-government adoption in Saudi Arabia: a study from the business sector perspective. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(1), 655–664 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alomari, M.K.: Discovering citizens reaction toward EGOVERNMENT: factors in E-government adoption. JISTEM – J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 11(1), 05–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V.: E-government Adoption in Qatar: investigating the citizens’ perspective. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aphane, J.: Delimitation, voter registration and election results – a modern day GIS perspective. In: Geospatial Africa 2015, South Africa (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashaye, O.R., Irani, Z.: E-government implementation factors: a conceptual framework. J. Mod. Account. Audit. 10(2), 241–247 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonham, G., Seifert, J., Thorson, S.: The transformational potential of E-government: the role of political leadership. In: The 4th Pan European International Relations Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bott, M., Young, G.: Croudsourcing for better governance: the role of crowdsourcing for better governance in international development. Fletcher J. Hum. Secur. 27, 47–70 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brynard, P.A., Hanekom, S.X.: Introduction to Research in Public Administration. Van Schaik (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bwalya, K.J.: Determining factors influencing e-government development in the developing world: a case study of Zambia. J. e-Gov. Stud. Best Pract. (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carter, L., Bélanger, F.: The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15, 5–26 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chavan, G.R., Rathod, M.L.: E-governance and its implementation. SRELS J. Inf. Manag. 46(1), 17–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chong, A.Y.L., Ooi, K.B., Lin, B.S., Raman, M.: Factors affecting the adoption level of c- commerce: an empirical study. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 50(2), 13–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davidrajuh, R.: Realizing a new e-commerce tool for formation of a virtual enterprise. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 103, 434–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dimitrova, D.V., Beilock, R.: Where freedom matters: Internet adoption among the formerly socialist countries. Gaz.: Int. J. Commun. Stud. 67(2), 173–187 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans, D., Yen, D.C.: E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for understanding cultural and social impact. Gov. Inf. Q. 22(3), 354–373 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Everton, N., Waithaka, H., Watene, G.: A distributed geospatial information system for managing elections: a case study of Kenya. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 2(9), 158–161 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fang, Z.: E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. Int. J. Comput. Internet Manag. 10(2), 1–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Frank, L.: Architecture for integration of distributed ERP systems and e-commerce systems. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 104, 418–429 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P.: Barriers and benefits in the adoption of E-government. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 17(4), 286–301 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goodchild, M.: Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 1, 3–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goodchild, M., Palladino, J.R.: Geographic information system as a tool in science and technology education. Specul. Sci. Technol. 18, 278–286 (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Geographic information systems. In: Hanson, S. (ed.) Ten Geographic Ideas that Changed the World, pp. 60–86. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grant, A., Razdan, R., Shang, T.: Coordinates for change: how GIS technology and geospatial analytics can improve city services. Government Designed for New Times, 32–43 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gupta, A.K.C., Kumar, P., Kumar, N.V.: Development of geospatial map based election portal. In: The 2014 ISPRS Technical Commission VIII Symposium International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 10, Hyderabad, India, pp. 1149–1152 (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gupta, K.P., Singh, S., Bhaskar, P.: Citizen adoption of E-government: a literature review and conceptual framework. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 12(2), 160–185 (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hassan, A.A.: E-grievance System in Local Government: Case Study, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heeks, R.: Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Inf. Soc. 18, 101–112 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hickel, C., Blankenbach, J.: From Local SDI to E-government, case study in municipalities in the south of Hesse, FIG Working week (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hofheinz, A.: The internet in the Arab World: playground for political liberalization. IPG J. (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L., Tam, K.Y.: Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 16, 91–112 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ijeh, A.: Geofencing as a Tool for Urban Planning, UN-HBITAT E-Governance and Urban Policy Design in Developing Countries Report, 84–102 (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    International IDEA: An Overview of the Electoral Risk Management Tool (ERM Tool), Stockholm, Sweden (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ITU E-government Implementation Toolkit: A Framework for e-Government Readiness and Action Priorities 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kamal, M.M., Themistocleous, M.: A conceptual model for EAI Adoption in an E- government Environment. In: Paper presented at the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), Costa Blanca, Spain (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kim, K., Prabhakar, B.: Initial trust and the adoption of B2C E-commerce: the case of internet banking. ACM Sigmis Database 35, 50–64 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kumar, R., Best, M.L.: Impact and sustainability of E-government services in developing countries: lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. Inf. Soc. 22(1), 1–12 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kurunananda, A., Weerakkody, V.: E-government Implementation in Sri Lanka: lessons from the UK. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Information Technology Conference, Colombo, Sri Lanka (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maguire, D.J.: GIS: A tool or science. Birmingham City University UK (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marson, T., Badaruddin, M., Azizan, M.: GIS base tourism decision support system for Langkawi Island, Kedah, Malaysia. Theor. Empir. Res. Urban Manag. 10(2), 21–35 (2015)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moody, Rebeccca: Assessing the role of GIS in E-government: a tale of E-participation in two cities. In: Wimmer, Maria A., Scholl, Jochen, Grönlund, Åke (eds.) EGOV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 354–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mossenburg, K., Tolbert, C., Stansbury, M.: Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. George Washington University Press, Washington DC (2003)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    OECD: Citizens as Partners – Information, Consultation, and Public Participation in Policy-Making. OECD e-Book (2001)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    OECD: The E-Government Imperative, OECDE-Government Studies: OECD, Paris (2003)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    O’reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, Published on O’Reilly (2005). (
  52. 52.
    Pandagale, P.U., Mundhe, M.R., Pathan, A.: Geospatial information system for tourism management in Aurangabad city- a review. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 3(5), 720–724 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ramaswamy, M., Selian, A.N.: On the dimensions of e-government interactions. Issues Inf. Syst. 8(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reddick, C.G.: A two stage model of e-government growth: theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 21(1), 51–64 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: i(3rd edition). Prentice Hall, Harlow (2003)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schwester, R.W.: Examining the barriers to E-government adoption. Electron. J. E-Gov. 7(1), 113–122 (2009)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shah, S.A., Wani, M.A.: Application of geospatial technology for the promotion of tourist industry in Srinagar city. Int. J. U-E-Serv. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 37–50 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Siau, K., Long, Y.: Synthesizing e-government stage models- a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 105, 443–458 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Siau, K., Tian, Y.: Supply chains integration: architecture and enabling technologies. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 44, 67–72 (2004)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stachowicz, S.: Geographical data sharing – advantages of web based technology to local government. In: 10th EC GI & GIS Workshop, ESDI State of the Art, Warsaw, Poland (2004)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Susanto, T.D.: Individual acceptance of e-government: a literature review. Soc. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun. J. (2013). ISBN: 978-0-9891305-2-3Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Turban, K., Lee, W.: Electronic Commerce, A Managerial Perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., Fraser, J., Haston, S., Georgiadis, P.: Barriers to electronic service development. e-Service Journal 4(1), 41–63 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Voutinioti, A.: Determinants of User Adoption of e-Government Services in Greece and the role of Citizen Service Centres. In: 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment, (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., Papasratorn, B.: Understanding citizen’s continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy. Electronic Journal of E-Government 6(1), 55–64 (2008)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P., Rose, G.: Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electron. Mark. 12, 157–162 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Williams, M.D., Rana N.P., Roderick S., Clement M.: Gender, age and frequency of internet use as moderators of citizens’ adoption of electronic government. In: Proceedings in Twenty Second Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Diego (2016)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    World Bank: Building Blocks of e-Governments: Lessons from Developing Countries, Development Economics Vice Presidency and Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network (PREM Notes for Public Sector), No. 91 (2004)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yan, X., Wang, Y.: Development of Zaozhuang tourism information system based on WebGIS. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 9(6), 249–252 (2012)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yildiz, M.: A general evaluation of the theory and practice of e-government (In Turkish). In: Acar, M., Ozgur, H. (eds.) Cagdas Kamu Yonetimi-1, pp. 305–328. Nobel Publications, Istanbul (2003)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Malhotra, N.K., Baalbaki, I.B., Bechwati, N.N.: Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Published by Pearson Education, Inc., Arab World edition (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Harfouche, A.: Big brother is watching you: inhibitors and enablers of public E-services in Lebanon. In: tGov workshop 2010 (tGOV 2010). Brunel University, West London, March 2010Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd edn. Sagem Publications, London (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hinton, P.R., Brownlow, C., McMurvay, I., Cozens, B.: SPSS Explained, East Sussex. Routledge Inc., England (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Carter, L., Schaupp, L., Evans, A.: Antecedents to E-file adoption: the US perspective. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 216 (2008)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dwivedi, Y.K., Choudrie, J., Brinkman, W.P.: Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 106, 700–718 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Straub, D., Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 380–427 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations