Advertisement

How Social Media Can Afford Engagement Processes

  • Xiaoxiao Zeng
  • Brad McKennaEmail author
  • Shahper Richter
  • Wenjie Cai
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

The increasing popularity of social media has led many organizations to find new ways of customer engagement. This paper presents an initial pilot study to explore the affordance of social media in engagement processes. By applying the affordance theory and Porter’s process for engagement model, we used a case study approach to examine the case company’s Facebook and Twitter content to identify the engagement possibilities of social media. Our preliminary results show that social media opens a new channel for organisations to engage with their customers. We present a preliminary theoretical model to understand the how the functional affordances of social media are socialised in engagement processes, which ultimately gives rise to socialised affordances.

Keywords

Social media Engagement Functional affordances Socialised affordances 

References

  1. 1.
    Noguti, V.: Post language and user engagement in online content communities. Eur. J. Mark. 50(5/6), 695–723 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahim, N.F., Wang, X., Bourne, H.: Exploring the effect of user engagement in online brand communities: evidence from Twitter. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 321–338 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, J., Broderick, A.J., Lee, N.: Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. J. Interact. Mark. 21(3), 2–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gensler, S., et al.: Managing brands in the social media environment. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 242–256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallaugher, J., Ransbotham, S.: Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Q. Exec. 9(4), 197–212 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hennig-Thurau, T., Wiertz, C., Feldhaus, F.: Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(3), 375–394 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mollen, A., Wilson, H.: Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives. J. Bus. Res. 63(9–10), 919–925 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, Y.-M., Lin, C.-H., Lai, C.-Y.: Identifying influential reviewers for word-of-mouth marketing. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(4), 294–304 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamilton, K., Alexander, M.: Organic community tourism: a cocreated approach. Ann. Tour. Res. 42, 169–190 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R.E., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habibi, M.R., Laroche, M., Richard, M.-O.: The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 152–161 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Popp, B., Woratschek, H.: Introducing branded communities in sport for building strong brand relations in social media. Sport Manag. Rev. 19(2), 183–197 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brownstein, M.: Overreliance on social media will damage your brand. Adage (2010). http://adage.com/article/small-agency-diary/overreliance-social-media-damage-brand/143779/. Accessed 17 July 2017
  14. 14.
    Hudson, S., et al.: The influence of social media interactions on consumer–brand relationships: a three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33(1), 27–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Looy, A.: Social Media Management. STBE. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21990-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naaman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.-H.: Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovejoy, K., Saxton, G.D.: Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 17(3), 337–353 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harder, A., Howard, V., Sedo, D.R.: Creating cohesive community through shared reading: a case study of One Book Nova Scotia. Can. J. Libr. Inf. Pract. Res. 10(1), 1–21 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutchby, I.: Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2), 441–456 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng, Y., Yu, A.: Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of Free Lunch for Children in China. Inf. Syst. J. 26(3), 289–313 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Markus, M.L., Silver, M.S.: A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(10/11), 609–632 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35(1), 147–167 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36(1), 143–189 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Majchrzak, A., Lynne Markus, M.: Encyclopedia of Management Theory: Technology Affordances and Constraints Theory (of MIS), pp. 832–836. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKenna, B., Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: Social media in qualitative research: challenges and recommendations. Inf. Organ. 27(2), 87–99 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agostini, J.-M.: The case for direct questions on reading habits. J. Advert. Res. 2, 28–33 (1964)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Porter, C.E., et al.: How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 53(4), 80–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van Weezel, A., Benavides, C.: How to engage the audience? A study on using Twitter to engage newspaper readers. In: Friedrichsen, M., Mühl-Benninghaus, W. (eds.) Handbook of Social Media Management. MEDIA, pp. 703–713. Springer, Berlin (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin, J., Ryaboy, D.: Scaling big data mining infrastructure: the Twitter experience. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 14(2), 6–19 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tuten, T.L.: Advertising 2.0: Social Media Marketing in a Web 2.0 World. Praeger, London (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J.: Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus. Horiz. 52(4), 357–365 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vollmer, C., Precourt, G.: Always on: Advertising, Marketing, and Media in an Era of Consumer Control (Strategy + Business). McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Culnan, M.J., McHugh, P.J., Zubillaga, J.I.: How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Q. Exec. 9(4), 243–259 (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ashley, C., Tuten, T.: Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychol. Mark. 32(1), 15–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C.: Enabling community through social media. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(10), 248 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gruzd, A., Mai, P., Kampen, A.: A how-to for using Netlytic to collect and analyze social media data: a case study of the use of Twitter during the 2014 Euromaidan Revolution in Ukraine. In: Sloan, L., Quan-Haase, A. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods, pp. 513–529. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wei, W., Miao, L., Huang, Z.J.: Customer engagement behaviors and hotel responses. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 33, 316–330 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cabiddu, F., de Carlo, M., Piccoli, G.: Social media affordances: enabling customer engagement. Ann. Tour. Res. 48, 175–192 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoxiao Zeng
    • 1
  • Brad McKenna
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shahper Richter
    • 2
  • Wenjie Cai
    • 3
  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Auckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations