Advertisement

Exploratory Research to Identify the Characteristics of Cyber Victims on Social Media in New Zealand

  • Varun Dhond
  • Shahper Richter
  • Brad McKennaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 341)

Abstract

Cyberbullying is omnipresent among all sections of society who have access to the internet. Vast research has been carried out on this topic around the world however there has not been enough research that is New Zealand based. The objective of this research is to identify the characteristics of cyber victims on social media in New Zealand. We scrutinize the prevalence of cyberbullying in New Zealand among university students based on age, gender and personality. The survey was designed stating the hypotheses developed as a result of the literature review. We gathered the data of sample size n = 158. We conclude that students with openness to experience are more likely to be cyberbullied compared to the other personalities. Whereas, we found no correlation of age and gender with the cyber bullying on a university level. The results from this study can have a positive application in counter cyberbullying programs in New Zealand. This study will a give an impetus for further analytical research in the field of cyber bullying in New Zealand.

Keywords

Social media Cyberbullying Personality Cyber victims New Zealand 

References

  1. 1.
    Olweus, D.: Cyber Bullying. Aggression and Violence: A Social Psychological Perspective (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauman, S., Toomey, R.B., Walker, J.L.: Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. J. Adolesc. 36(2), 341–350 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., Jackson, M.: Cyberbullying among youth: a comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. Sch. Psychol. Int. 34(6), 575–612 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holt, M.K., et al.: Multidisciplinary approaches to research on bullying in adolescence. Adolesc. Res. Rev. 2(1), 1–10 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandrashekhar, A., Muktha, G., Anjana, D.: Cyberstalking and cyberbullying: effects and prevention measures. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. 2(3), 95–102 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perren, S., et al.: Bullying in school and cyberspace: associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 4(1), 28 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Price, M., Dalgleish, J.: Cyberbullying: experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Stud. Aust. 29(2), 51 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kljakovic, M., Hunt, C., Jose, P.: Incidence of bullying and victimisation among adolescents in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Psychol. 44(2), 57–67 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinduja, S. Patchin, J.W.: Cyberbullying statistics (2014). http://www.puresight.com/Cyberbullying/cyber-bullying-statistics.html
  10. 10.
    Bayzick, J., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L.: Detecting the presence of cyberbullying using computer software (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maher, D.: Cyberbullying: An ethnographic case study of one Australian upper primary school class. Youth Stud. Aust. 27(4), 50 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willard, N.: Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, Eugene, OR (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Willard, N.E.: Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Research Press (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patchin, J.W., Hinduja, S.: Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv. Justice 4(2), 148–169 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Limber, S.P., Small, M.A.: State laws and policies to address bullying in schools. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 32(3), 445–456 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campbell, M.A.: Cyber bullying: an old problem in a new guise? J. Psychol. Couns. Sch. 15(1), 68–76 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Craig, W.M.: The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Pers. Individ. Differ. 24(1), 123–130 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Forero, R., et al.: Bullying behaviour and psychosocial health among school students in New South Wales, Australia: cross sectional survey. BMJ 319(7206), 344–348 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hodges, E.V., Perry, D.G.: Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76(4), 677 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roland, E.: Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Educ. Res. 44(1), 55–67 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rates of cyber bullying in New Zealand alarming, in NZ Herald (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Awiria, O., Olweus, D., Byrne, B.: Bullying at School-What We Know and What We Can DoCoping with Bullying in Schools (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crick, N.R., Grotpeter, J.K.: Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev. 66(3), 710–722 (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams, K.R., Guerra, N.G.: Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 41(6), S14–S21 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jose, P.E., et al.: The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. J. Res. Adolesc. 22(2), 301–309 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ybarra, M.L., Mitchell, K.J.: Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. J. Res. Adolesc. 27(3), 319–336 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, Q.: Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. Sch. Psychol. Int. 27(2), 157–170 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slonje, R., Smith, P.K., FriséN, A.: The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 26–32 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Björkqvist, K.: Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: a review of recent research. Sex Roles 30(3), 177–188 (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paulhus, D.L., Williams, K.M.: The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J. Res. Pers. 36(6), 556–563 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Geis, F., Levy, M.: Studies in Machiavellianism. Elsevier (1970)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raskin, R.N. Hall, C.S.: A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological reports (1979)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reidy, D.E., et al.: Effects of narcissistic entitlement and exploitativeness on human physical aggression. Pers. Individ. Differ. 44(4), 865–875 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ang, R.P., Tan, K.-A., Talib Mansor, A.: Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying. J. Interpers. Violence 26(13), 2619–2634 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K.: What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries. J. Child. Media 7(1), 9–27 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Görzig, A.: Who bullies and who is bullied online?: A study of 9–16 year old internet users in 25 European countries (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dooley, J., Pyzalski, J., Cross, D.: Cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying: similarities and differences. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J. Psychol. 217(4), 182–188 (2009)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heirman, W., Walrave, M.: Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychol.: J. Psychosoc. Res. Cyberspace 2(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spears, B., et al.: Behind the scenes and screens: insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J. Psychol. 217(4), 189–196 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith, P.K., et al.: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(4), 376–385 (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang, S., et al.: Friend or foe: cyberbullying in social network sites. ACM SIGMIS Database 47(1), 51–71 (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao, R., Zhou, A., Mao, K.: Automatic detection of cyberbullying on social networks based on bullying features. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xu, J.-M., et al.: Learning from bullying traces in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Witmer, D.F.: Risky business: why people feel safe in sexually expicit on‐line communication. J. Comput.‐Mediat. Commun. 2(4) (1997)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Slonje, R., Smith, P.K.: Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand. J. Psychol. 49(2), 147–154 (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Beran, T., Li, Q.: The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. J. Stud. Wellbeing 1(2), 16–33 (2008)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Didden, R., et al.: Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Dev. Neurorehabil. 12(3), 146–151 (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., Belschak, F.: Cyberbullying: who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in Internet chatrooms and victimization in school. J. Media Psychol. 21(1), 25–36 (2009)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Hunt, M.: Student survey of bullying behavior–revised 2 (SSBB-R2). Georgia State University, Center for Research on School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management, Atlanta, GA (2006)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    DeHue, F., Bolman, C., Völlink, T.: Cyberbullying: youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychol. Behav. 11(2), 217–223 (2008)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kowalski, R.M., Limber, S.P.: Electronic bullying among middle school students. J. Adolesc. Health 41(6), S22–S30 (2007)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ybarra, M.L., Diener-West, M., Leaf, P.J.: Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. J. Adolesc. Health 41(6), S42–S50 (2007)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ybarra, M.L., Mitchell, K.J.: How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics 121(2), e350–e357 (2008)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Erdur-Baker, Ö.: Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 12(1), 109–125 (2010)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Boulton, M.J., Underwood, K.: Bully/victim problems among middle school children. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 62(1), 73–87 (1992)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lagerspetz, K.M., et al.: Group aggression among school children in three schools. Scand. J. Psychol. 23(1), 45–52 (1982)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    O’moore, A. Hillery, B.: Bullying in Dublin schools. Ir. J. Psychol. 10(3), 426–441 (1989)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Stephenson, P., Smith, D.: Bullying in the junior school. In: Bullying in Schools, pp. 45–57 (1989)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr., P.T.: Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am. Psychol. 52(5), 509 (1997)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Utz, S.: Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: how one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 15(2), 314–335 (2010)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Vazsonyi, A.T., et al.: Cyberbullying in context: direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 9(2), 210–227 (2012)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Iarossi, G.: The Power of Survey Design: A User’s Guide for Managing Surveys, Interpreting Results, and Influencing Respondents. World Bank Publications (2006)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Peluchette, J.V., et al.: Cyberbullying victimization: do victims’ personality and risky social network behaviors contribute to the problem? Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 424–435 (2015)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vodanovich, S.: Digital Native Well-being and Development in Ubiquitous Spaces (2014). ResearchSpace@AucklandGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dehne, M., Schupp, J.: Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP)-Konzept. Umsetzung und empirische Eigenschaften. Res. Notes 26, 1–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Unwin, A.: Discovering statistics using R by Andy Field, Jeremy Miles, Zoë Field. Int. Stat. Rev. 81(1), 169–170 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kaiser, H.F.: An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1), 31–36 (1974)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Haynie, D.L., et al.: Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: distinct groups of at-risk youth. J. Early Adolesc. 21(1), 29–49 (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Christie, R., Geis, F.L.: Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press (2013)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ko, C.-H., et al.: The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res. 175(1), 121–125 (2010)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kuss, D.J., Griffiths, M.D., Binder, J.F.: Internet addiction in students: prevalence and risk factors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 959–966 (2013)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Terracciano, A., et al.: Five-factor model personality profiles of drug users. BMC Psychiatry 8(1), 22 (2008)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chan, S.F., La Greca, A.M.: Cyber victimization and aggression: are they linked with adolescent smoking and drinking? Child Youth Care Forum 45, 47–63 (2016)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hofstede, G.: Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2(1), 8 (2011)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Cultures. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nansel, T.R., et al.: Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA 285(16), 2094–2100 (2001)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Spriggs, A.L., et al.: Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. J. Adolesc. Health 41(3), 283–293 (2007)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kenny, K., Fayers, A.: How the ethnic mix in your community is set to change (2015). http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/72557057/How-the-ethnic-mix-in-your-community-is-set-to-change. Accessed 30 Sept 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations