Advertisement

Gamification for Handing Educational Innovation Challenges

  • Z. YordanovaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)

Abstract

The papers aims at exploring gamification as a tool for handing some educational innovation challenges. The study summarizes though a literature analysis some educational innovation challenges that have been provoked by the increasing innovations in the area of education and the growth of failures and unsatisfying results from educational innovations implementation and application. On the other hand, gamification proposes a way to handle, with its diverse elements and characteristics, some of these challenges and possibly to impact the effectiveness of implementing and applying educational innovations. The research methodology employs a literature analysis so as to elicit some fundamental educational challenges and then a cluster analysis is done via content research. The result from this step is formulating some common educational innovation-related groups for further analysis. Later in the research, by utilizing the explored and summarized gamification tools and elements, to each educational innovation group, a potential gamification tool is assigned. The results are from interest of both educational and innovation experts and researchers. The outcomes may also be used directly in solving some of the educational issues.

Keywords

Education Innovation management Educational innovation Gamification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Bulgarian NFS under the grant “Young Scientists – 2017” No DM 15/4 – 2017 and also by University of National and World Economy under the project No NID NI-14/2018.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Khateeb M, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2014) Sustainable university model for higher education in Iraq. Creat Educ 5:318–328.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.55041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almarabeh T, Mohammad H, Yousef R, Majdalawi Y (2014) The University of Jordan E-learning platform: state, students’ acceptance and challenges. J Softw Eng Appl 7:999–1007.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2014.712087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rym B, Olfa B, Mélika B (2013) Determinants of E-learning acceptance: an empirical study in the tunisian context. Am J Ind Bus Manag 3(3):307–321.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.33036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagheri S, Kusters R, Trienekens J, van der Zandt H (2016) Classification framework of knowledge transfer issues across value networks. Product-Serv Syst Across Life Cycle Proced CIRP 47:382–387Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Cano-Kollmann M, Cantwell J, Hannigan T et al (2016) J Int Bus Stud 47(3):255–262.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung C (2012) Entrepreneurship education at the crossroad in Hong Kong. Creat Educ 3:666–670.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clements J (2013) British film institute anime: a history. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coccia M (2016) Problem-driven innovation in drug discovery: co-evolution of the patterns of radical innovation with the evolution of problems. Problem-driveninnovationsindrugdiscovery: Co-evolution of the patterns of radical innovation with the evolution of problems,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.02.003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2810128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cortes-Robles et al. (2019) Managing Innovation in Highly Restrictive Environments, Management and Industrial Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93716-8_7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cortés-Robles, García-Alcaraz L, Alor-Hernández (2016) Managing innovation in highly restrictive environment: lessons from Latin America and Emerging Markets. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De-Marcos L, Domínguez A, Saenz-de-Navarrete J, Pagés C (2014) An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Comput Educ 75:82–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deterding et al (2011) From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In: Lugmayr A, Franssila H, Safran C, Hammouda I (eds) MindTrek 2011, pp 9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
  15. 15.
    Domínguez A et al (2013) Gamifying learning experiences: practical implications and outcomes. Comput Educ 63:380–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ebersole J (2014) Top issues facing higher education in 2014. ForbesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fullan M (2007) The new meaning of educational change, teachers college press, 5th ednGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gilsinga V, Bekkersb R, Freitasc I, Steend M (2011) Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: Transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation 31(12):638–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giménez NP (2016) Profile of promoters and hindering teachers creativity: own or shared? Creat Educ 7(10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hannon V (2009) ‘Only Connect!’: a new paradigm for learning innovation in the 21st Century, Centre for Strategic InnovationGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heidenreich M (2012) The social embeddedness of multinational companies: a literature review. Socia-Econ Rev 10(3):549–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84457-884-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kapp KM (2012) The Gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. PfeifferGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kohonen A (2013) On detection of volatility spillovers in simultaneously open stock markets. J Empir Financ 22:140–158Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koivisto J, Hamari J (2014) Demographic differences in perceived benefits from Gamification. Comput Hum Behav 35:179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kozma RB (2003) Technology, innovation, and educational change. a global perspective: a report of the second information technology in education study module 2. ISTE PublisherGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee J, Hammer J (2011) Gamification in education: what, how, why bother? Acad Exch Q 122:1–5Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee Y (2013) The teaching method of creative education. Creat Educ 4:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.48A006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levi A (2013) The sweet smell of Japan: Anime, Manga and Japan in North America. J Asian Pacific Commun 23:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matsumoto T (2016) Motivation strategy using Gamification. Creat Educ 7:1480–1485.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.710153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menezes C, Bortolli R (2016) Potential of Gamification as assessment tool. Creat Educ 7:561–566.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibezim N (2013) Technologies needed for sustainable E-learning in university education. Mod Econ 4(10):633–638.  https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2013.410068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nosari S (2012) Creativity at the crossroad creative education as moral education? Creat Educ 3:63–65.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37B015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pinho T, Delou C, Lima N (2016) Origami as a tool to teach geometry for blind students. Creat Educ 7:2652–2665.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.717249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Redfield CL (2013) Gamification and creating game developers. In: 2013 Proceedings of the information systems educators conference, San Antonio, Vol 30Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sattinger M (2006) Overlapping labor markets. Labor Econ 13(2):237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Søderberg AM, Vaara E (2003) Merging across borders: people. CBS Press, Cultures and PoliticsGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Staley DJ & Trinkle DA (2011) The changing landscape of higher education. Educ Rev 46:15–31Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Surendeleg G, Murwa V, Yun H-K and Kim YS (2014) The role of Gamification in education—A literature review. Contemp Eng Sci 7:1609–1616. http://www.m-hikari.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taylor et al (2018) Propagating the adoption of CS educational innovations, ITiCSE 2018, June 2018, Larnaca, CyprusGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tziallas G, Kontogeorgos A, Papanastasiou C (2016) An E-learning platform for departmental use. Creat Educ 7:1189–1194.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.79124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Venera TA (2016) Aspects regarding the role of facilitators in creative learning and innovative teaching. Annals of the “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, Special Issue, vol II/2016, pp 48–52Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wai C (2017) Innovation and social impact in higher education: some lessons from Tohoku university and the open university of Hong Kong. Open J Soc Sci 5:139–153.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.59011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wuwei L (2002) Industry amalgamation and industry innovation. Shanghai Manag Sci 04Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhelev P (2014)International technology transfer to Bulgaria after its European union accession. Econ Altern, Issue 3, pp 83094Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zichermann G, Cunningham C (2011) Gamification by design: implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of National and World EconomySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations