Effective Staff Training for the Contract System in the Conditions of the Digital Economy: Opportunities and Limitations

  • L. V. Averina
  • E. P. PecherskayaEmail author
  • O. V. Astafeva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 908)


Effective staff’ training, acting as one of the leading factors in the successful functioning of the contract system, is an urgent need of the society. In this regard, the subject of this study is the formation of integrative model for staff in procurement (contract managers) training that can serve to developing the potential of the Russian economy. The results of this research is the development of a model for training contract managers (syn. procurement specialists), taking into account the aspects of professional experience revealed in the process of approbation of this model in the pedagogical activity of the author on the basis of the Federal Innovation Platform in Procurement, Samara State University of Economics (further referred to as “SSEU”) from 2013 till present. Characteristic features of the methodical system for the training of contract managers have been analyzed. The results of the research can be used as a basis for the organization of vocational training and retraining, optimization of existing programs of professional development and implementation of innovative projects in these areas.


Continuous education Additional vocational education Contract system Innovative infrastructure 


  1. 1.
    Axelrad H, Luski I et al. (2016) Behavioral biases in the labor market, differences between older and younger individuals. J Behav Exp Econ 60:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Averina LV, Pecherskaya EP (2015) Actual problems of preparation of a specialist in the field of procurement. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference of students, graduate students and young scientists “Social behavior of youth on the Internet: new trends in the era of globalization.” SSEU, pp 39–41Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Averina LV (2017) Models of organization of dialogical interaction in the implementation of DPO programs in the field of procurement. Sb. articles of the International scientific-practical conference “European research”, pp 266–268Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abakumova OA (2014) Legal status of the contract manager. Academic Herald. N2 (28):269–276Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barron B (1998) Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. J Learn Sci 7(3&4):271–311Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berry A (2008) Tensions in teaching about teaching: understanding practice as a teacher educator. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clandinin DJ, Huber J (2010) Narrative inquiry. In: McGaw B, Baker E, Peterson PP (eds) International encyclopedia of education, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New York, NY, pp 436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarin MV (1997) Innovations in education: metaphors and models. Analisys of foreign experience. Moscow, Nauka. 263 pGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Vries Marc J (2018) Handbook of technology education. Springer International Publishing. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dufek L (2015) Public procurement: a panel data approach. Proced Econ Financ 25:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edler J, Yeow J (2016) Connecting demand and supply. The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Res Policy 45(2):414–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enke J, Kraft K, Metternich J (2015) Competency-oriented design of learning modules. Proced CIRP 32:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garbett D, Ovens A (eds) (2017) Becoming self-study researchers in a digital world. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guryanova A, Khafiyatullina E, Kolibanov A, Makhovikov A, Frolov V (2018) Philosophical view on human existence in the world of technic and information. Adv Intell Syst Comput 622:97–104. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guryanova A, Astafeva N, Filatova N, Khafiyatullina E, Guryanov N (2018) Philosophical problems of information and communication technology in the process of modern socio-economic development. Adv Intell Syst Comput 726:1033–1040. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hadjar A, Samuel R (2015) Does upward socila mobility increase life satisfaction? A longitudinal analysis using British and Swiss panel data. Res Soc Stratif Mobil 39:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karanatova LG, Kulev AYu (2015) Organization of university innovative platforms as factor of development of competences of innovative business [Organizatsiya universitetskikh innovatsionnykh ploshchadok kak faktor razvitiya kompetentsii innovatsionnogo predprinimatel’stva]. Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. N 12, pp 15–23Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirichenko YuA (2012) Modern information technologies in additional professional education. Vestnik TISBI. № 2(50):18Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larchenko YuG (2015) Game technologies in additional professional education. Additional vocational education. Modern Stud Soc Probl № 1(21):195–200Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Markham T (2011) Project based learning. Teach Librarian 39(2):38–42Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menshenina SG (2018)The structure of knowledge to the professional activity of information security specialists. Bull Samara State Techn Univ Ser Psychol Pedagogical Sci № 2(18):100–107Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naumova TB (2009) Additional professional education in the system of continuing education. Competence № 5:10–16Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pecherskaya EP, Averina LV, Kochetckova NV, Chupina VA, Akimova OB (2016) Methodology of project managers’ competency formation in CPE. IJME-Math Educ 11(8):3066–3075Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pellegrino JW, Hilton ML (eds) (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st Century NAS Press, 204 pGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sarkisyan UV (2011) Project competency of goverment and municipal officials as an object of sociological study. Authority. from:
  26. 26.
    Sawyer RK (2006) The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 250Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scheglova TM (2013) Proektnaya kompetentnost: suschnost, struktura, soderzhanie. from
  28. 28.
    Shamakhov VA, Karanatova LG, Kuzmina AM (2017) The research directed to results of activity of the federal innovative platforms forming professional competences of the sphere of the state and municipal procurement assessment. Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. N 12, pp 8–21Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sklyarova IM (2014) Functionality of contract managers in the field of public procurements. Labor and social relations. № 8:26–32Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sullivan KPH, Czigler PE, Hellgren JMS (2013) Cases on Professional Distance Education Degree Programs and Practices: Successes, Challenges, and Issues. IGI GlobalGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tisch M, Hertle C, Cachay J, Abele E, Metternich J, Tenberg RA (2013) Systematic approach on developing action-oriented, competency-based learning factories. Proced CIRP 7:580–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vvedensky VN, Donnikova TS (2014) Correlation of activity and project competency of specialist. Science. Arts. Culture. from:
  33. 33.
    Zhang Yu (Aimee) (2015) Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Springer.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  2. 2.Financial University under the Government of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations