Advertisement

Advancing Facet Theory as the Framework of Choice to Understand Complex Phenomena in the Social and Human Sciences

  • Antonio Roazzi
  • Bruno Campello de Souza
Chapter

Abstract

Social and human phenomena are typically extremely complex due to the large amount of variables involved and to the intricate multiple intercorrelations between them. The relationship between variables A and B almost always seems to depend on the relationship between each of them and other variables, which interact in a similar fashion with yet other variables and so forth. For any researcher in the field, the major challenge is to find overarching patterns in a broad and convoluted set of observations so as to inspire and/or put to test scientific models regarding mechanisms and processes that could be proposed to explain how people function. The prominent Israeli-American mathematician, sociologist, and psychologist Louis Guttman developed a theoretical–analytical framework, called Facet Theory, which was designed to address precisely such issues. His mathematical approach allows for the intuitive visual representation of multiple interactions between variables at once, and for the interpretation of the result in terms of structures with theoretical meaning. The authors of the present chapter have, since the 1980s, been making use of Facet Theory to study multiple topics in psychology, sociology, anthropology, management, and economics, among others, finding patterns in complex datasets through which the understanding of the phenomena under investigation could be improved and, at the same time, immensely simplified. Eventually, work was done comparing the efficacy of this approach to more traditional methods such as Factor Analysis, Cluster Analysis, and Structural Equation Modelling, invariably finding Facet Theory to be superior. More recently, some contribution has been made to the advancement of Facet Theory itself by means of the identification of the need to more rigorously address uncertainty in Smallest Space Analysis diagrams and the proposal of a specific procedure to achieve this. Throughout these more than 30 years, numerous students, both at graduate and undergraduate levels, have been trained in the use of Facet Theory. Also, a large number of scientific papers, book chapters, and conference lectures using the method have been published in Brazil and abroad. All of this contributes to the dissemination of Facet Theory and its potential in the local, national, and international spheres.

Keywords

Facet theory Louis Guttman Research design Theory construction Multidimensional scaling Regional hypotheses Smallest space analysis (SSA) POSAC Multidimensional scalogram analysis (MSA) Mapping sentence 

References

  1. N.L. Afanador, T.N. Tran, L.M.C. Buydens, An assessment of the jackknife and bootstrap procedures on uncertainty estimation in the variable importance in the projection metric. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 137, 162–172 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Argyle, Social Interaction (Methuen, London, 1969)Google Scholar
  3. N. Armistead (ed.), Reconstructing Social Psychology (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1974)Google Scholar
  4. W. Bilsky, M. Janik, Investigating value structure: using theory-based starting configurations in multidimensional scaling (research note). Revista de Psicología Social 25(3), 341–349 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1174/021347410792675606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. I. Borg, Some basic concepts of facet theory, in Geometric representations of relational data: Readings in multidimensional scaling, ed. by J. C. Lingoes, 2nd edn., (Mathesis, Ann Arbor, 1979)Google Scholar
  6. I. Borg, P.J.F. Groenen, Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York, 2005)Google Scholar
  7. I. Borg, J.C. Lingoes, A model and algorithm for multidimensional scaling with external constraints on the distances. Psychometrika 45, 25–38 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Bruner, Psychological theories and the image of man. Herbert Spencer Lectures, University of Oxford, 1976Google Scholar
  9. D. Canter (ed.), Facet Theory: Approaches to Social Research (Springer, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
  10. D. Canter, C. Kenny, The multivariate structure of design evaluation. Multivar. Behav. Res. 16, 215–236 (1981)Google Scholar
  11. D. Canter, The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Qual. Qual. 17, 35–67 (1983a)Google Scholar
  12. D. Canter, The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach. Environ. Behav. 15(6), 659–698 (1983b).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583156001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Canter, C.M.G. Monteiro, The lattice of polemic social representations: a comparison of the social representations of occupations in favelas, public housing and middle-class neighbourhoods of Brazil, in Empirical Approaches to Social Representations, ed. by E.G.M. Breakwell, D.V. Canter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993), pp. 223–247Google Scholar
  14. S. Ceci, A. Roazzi, The effects of context on cognition: postcards from Brazil, in Mind in Context: Interactionist Perspectives on Human Intelligence, ed. by R.J. Stenberg, R.K. Wagner (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994), pp. 74–101Google Scholar
  15. L.S. Dancer, Suicide prediction and the partial order Scalogram analysis of psychological adjustment. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 3l9(4), 479–497 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. M.L. Davidson, Introduction to multidimensional scaling and its applications. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 7, 373–379 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. K.W. Deutsch, J. Platt, D. Sengham, Conditions favoring major advances in social sciences. Science 171(3970), 450–459 (1971).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3970.450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. I. Donald, The cylindrex of place evaluation, in Facet Theory: Approaches to Social Research, ed. by D. C. Em, (Springer Verlag, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
  19. H. Feger, U. Von Hecker, Testing the predictions of facet theory. Proceedings da “IV International Conference on Facet Theory” realizada em Praga, Czech Republic, de 29 de Agosto a 01 de Setembro de 1993 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. J.P. Forgas, Multidimensional scaling: a discovery method in social psychology, in Emerging Strategies in Social Psychology, ed. by G.P. Ginsburg (Wiley, London, 1979)Google Scholar
  21. J.P. Forgas, Multidimensional scaling in social psychology, in Key Texts in Multidimensional Scaling, ed. by A.P.M. Coxon, P.M. Davis (Heinemann, London, 1982)Google Scholar
  22. J.P. Forgas, Multidimensional scaling (MDS), in Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychology, ed. by R. Harre, R. Lamb (Blackwells, Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar
  23. D. French, The relationship of anthropology to studies in perception and cognition, in Psychology: A Study of a Science, Investigations of Man as Socius: Their Place in Psychology and the Social Sciences, ed. by S. Koch, vol. 6, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963), pp. 388–128Google Scholar
  24. L.E. Garrido, F.J. Abad, V. Ponsoda, Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation. Psychol. Methods 21(1), 93–111 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. K.J. Gergen, Social psychology as history. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 26, 309–326 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. H. Gratch (ed.), Twenty-Five Years of Social Research in Israel (Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem, 1973)Google Scholar
  27. S. Greenland, M.A. Mansournia, D.G. Altman, Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight. BMJ 352, i1981 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. L. Guttman, Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components. Psychometrika 5, 75–99 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. L. Guttman, General theory and methods for matric factoring. Psychometrika 9, 1–16 (1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. L. Guttman, Multiple-group methods for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 17, 209–222 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. L. Guttman, A new approach to factor analysis: the radex, in Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences, ed. by P.F. Lazarsfeld (The Free Press, Glencoe, 1954a), pp. 258–348Google Scholar
  32. L. Guttman, Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 19, 149–161 (1954b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Guttman, The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory. Br. J. Stat. Psychol. 8, 65–81 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Guttman, ‘Best possible’ systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika 21, 272–228 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. L. Guttman, Simple proofs of relations between the communality problem and multiple correlation. Psychometrika 22, 147–157 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. L. Guttman, To what extent can communalities reduce rank? Psychometrika 23, 297–308 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. L. Guttman, Introduction to facet design and analysis, in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Psychology, Brussels, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1959), pp. 130–132Google Scholar
  38. L. Guttman, A faceted definition of intelligence, in Studies in Psychology. Scripta Hierosolymitana, vol. 14 (Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1965), pp. 166–181Google Scholar
  39. L. Guttman, A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika 33, 469–506 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. L. Guttman, Integration of test design and analysis, in Toward a Theory of Achievement Measurement, Proceedings of the 1969 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (Educational Testing Service, Princeton, 1970), pp. 53–65Google Scholar
  41. L. Guttman, Measurement as structural theory. Psychometrika 36, 329–347 (1971a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. L. Guttman, Social problem indicators. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 393, 40–46 (1971b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. L. Guttman, Facet theory, smallest space analysis, and factor analysis. Percept. Mot. Skills 54, 491–493 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. L. Guttman, S. Levy, Two structural laws for intelligence tests. Intelligence 15, 79–103 (1991)Google Scholar
  45. P.M.W. Hackett, Facet theory and the mapping sentence as hermeneutically consistent structured meta-ontology and structured meta-mereology. Front. Psychol. 7, 471 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00471CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Harré, P. Secord, The Explanation of Social Behaviour (Blackwell, Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar
  47. J. Israel, H. Tajfel (eds.), The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment (Academic Press, London, 1972)Google Scholar
  48. J.B. Kruskal, M. Wish, Multidimensional Scaling (Sage, Beverly Hills, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. M. Levine, Scientific method and the adversary model. Am. Psychol. 29, 661–677 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. S. Levy, Lawful roles of facets in social theories, in Facet Theory: Approach to Social Research, ed. by D. Canter (Springer, New York, 1985), pp. 59–96Google Scholar
  51. S. Levy (ed.), Louis Guttman on Theory and Methodology: Selected Writings (Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1994)Google Scholar
  52. S. Levy, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, vol 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005), pp. 175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. S. Levy, L. Guttman, Values and Attitudes of Israeli High School Youth (IIASR, Jerusalem, 1974)Google Scholar
  54. S. Levy, L. Guttman, On the multivariate structure of well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. 2, 361–388 (1975a)Google Scholar
  55. S. Levy, L. Guttman, Structure and dynamics of worries. Sociometry 38, 445–473 (1975b)Google Scholar
  56. S. Levy, Facet theory: An overview of cumulative theory construction. Proceedings da “IV International Conference on Facet Theory” realizada em Praga, Czech Republic, de 29 de Agosto a 01 de Setembro de 1993 (1993)Google Scholar
  57. J.C. Lingoes, The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series (Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, 1973)Google Scholar
  58. J.C. Lingoes, L.R. Tucker, S. Shye, Louis E. Guttman (1916-1987). Psychometrika 53(2), 153–159 (1988).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294129
  59. J. C. Lingoes (ed.), Geometric Representations of Relational Data (Mathesis, Ann Arbor, 1979)Google Scholar
  60. W.S. McGuire, The yin and the yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3, 446–456 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. C.M.G. Monteiro, A. Roazzi, Representações sociais e o processo de classificações múltiplas. Algumas implicações metodológicas no estudo da estruturação socioespacial da cidade. Psicologia Argumento 7(6), 55–78 (1987)Google Scholar
  62. G.T. Moore, R.W. Marans, Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design. Vol. 4: Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization (Plenum Press, New York, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. K.L. Pike, Emic and etic standpoints for the description of behaviour, in Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. Part I, ed. by K.L. Pike (Summer Institute of Linguistics, Glendale, 1954)Google Scholar
  64. K.L. Pike, Towards a theory of the structure of human behavior. Gen. Syst. 2, 135–141 (1957)Google Scholar
  65. K.L. Pike, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior (Mouton, Hague, 1966)Google Scholar
  66. A. Roazzi, Implicações metodológicas na pesquisa transcultural: a influência do contexto social em tarefas lógicas. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 38(3), 71–91 (1986)Google Scholar
  67. A. Roazzi, O desenvolvimento individual, o contexto social e a prática de pesquisa. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão 3, 27–33 (1987a)Google Scholar
  68. A. Roazzi, Pesquisa e contexto: métodos de investigação e diferenças sócioculturais em questão. Cad. Pesqui. 62, 35–44 (1987b)Google Scholar
  69. A. Roazzi, O desenvolvimento individual, o contexto social e a prática de pesquisa. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão 7(2), 27–33 (1987c).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98931987000200012
  70. A. Roazzi, Desenvolvimento Cognitivo e Pesquisa Piagetiana, in Anais do II Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Intercâmbio Científico (ANPEPP, Gramado – Rio Grande do Sul, Gramado, 1989), pp. 106–117.  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4623.0165
  71. A. Roazzi, Desvendando a outra face do saber. Reflexões sobre o livro ‘Na vida dez, na escola zero’. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão 2–4, 62–70 (1990)Google Scholar
  72. A. Roazzi, Procedimento de Classificações Múltiplas para o estudo de sistemas conceituais e sua forma de análise através de métodos de análise multidimensionais. Workshop realizado na XXIV Reunião Anual de Psicologia da Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia (Anais p. 111). Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 27 a 31 de Outubro, 1994Google Scholar
  73. A. Roazzi, Categorização, formação de conceitos e processos de construção de mundo: Procedimento de classificações múltiplas para o estudo de sistemas conceituais e sua forma de análise através de métodos de análise multidimensionais. Cadernos de Psicologia 1, 1–27 (1995)Google Scholar
  74. A. Roazzi, O papel da experiência, do significado e da representação no desenvolvimento e avaliação de habilidades cognitivas, in Tópicos em psicologia cognitiva, ed. by M.G. Dias, A.G. Spinillo (Editora Universitária da UFPE - Série Estudos Universitários, Recife, 1996), pp. 228–269Google Scholar
  75. A. Roazzi, Pesquisa básica em Psicologia Cognitiva e sua relação com a psicologia social. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 51(1), 23–54 (1999a)Google Scholar
  76. A. Roazzi, Lar-doce-lar: Rainha ou rei? A representação da participação masculina nas tarefas domésticas e a lógica de sua distribuição em casais de nível sócio-econômico baixo. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 51(4), 7–38 (1999b)Google Scholar
  77. A. Roazzi, P.E. Bryant, Social class, context and cognitive development, in Context and Cognition: Ways of Learning and Knowing, ed. by P. Light, G. Butterworth (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, 1992), pp. 14–27Google Scholar
  78. A. Roazzi, P. Bryant, Explicitness and conservation: social class differences. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 21(1), 51–70 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597384983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. A. Roazzi, M.G.B.B. Dias, A influência da experiência sociocultural em crianças Inglesas. Dados experimentais e explorações teóricas na tarefa de conservação. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 39(2), 39–56 (1987)Google Scholar
  80. A. Roazzi, M.G.B.B. Dias, Perceptual and measurement strategies in solving the conservation task: a social class comparison. Rev. Port. Educ. 5(2), 31–50 (1992)Google Scholar
  81. A. Roazzi, M.G.B.B. Dias, Teoria das facetas e avaliação na pesquisa social transcultural: Explorações no estudo do juízo moral, in A diversidade da avaliação psicológica: Considerações teóricas e práticas, ed. by Conselho Regional de Psicologia - 13a Região PB/RN (Idéia, João Pessoa, 2001), pp. 157–190Google Scholar
  82. A. Roazzi, C.M.G. Monteiro, A representação social da mobilidade profissional em função de diferentes contextos urbanos e suas implicações para a evasão escolar. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia 47(3), 39–73 (1995)Google Scholar
  83. A. Roazzi, T. Nunes, A representação da inteligência por parte dos professores e suas implicações para o desenvolvimento do autoconceito do aluno como aprendiz, in Crianças diferentes: Múltiplos olhares sobre como avaliar e intervir, ed. by A.A. Candeias (Universidade de Évora, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, e Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Évora, 2006)Google Scholar
  84. A. Roazzi, S.M. Santana, O adolescente e os seus projetos de vida. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia 29(2), 61–79 (1995)Google Scholar
  85. A. Roazzi, M. Wilson, F. Federicci, Exploring the social representation of fear in children: A social class comparison, in Facet Theory: Theory and Content, ed. by J. J. Hox, P. Swanborn, G. J. Mellemberg, (SETOS, Zeist, 1995), pp. 187–196Google Scholar
  86. A. Roazzi, A.D. Carvalho, P.V. Guimarães, Análise da estrutura de similaridade de Burnout: Validação da escala Maslach Burnout Inventory em professores. In Anais do V Encontro Mineiro de Avaliação Psicológica: Teorização e Prática, VIII Conferências Internacional de Avaliação Psicológica - Formas e Contexto e V Encontro Mineiro de Avaliação Psicológica: Teorização e Prática, Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte: PUC, 2000a, pp. 89–115Google Scholar
  87. A. Roazzi, M.G.B.B. Dias, A. Silva, O juízo moral da criança a transgressores e vítimas de injustiças: Estudo em crianças de meio sociocultural diferente. Temas em Psicologia 1, 25–38 (2000b)Google Scholar
  88. A. Roazzi, F.C.B. Federicci, M. Wilson, A Estrutura Primitiva da Representação Social do Medo. Psicologia: Reflexão e Critica 14(1), 57–72 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722001000100005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. A. Roazzi, F.C.B. Federicci, M.R. Carvalho, A questão do consenso nas representações sociais: um estudo do medo entre adultos. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 18, 179–192 (2002)Google Scholar
  90. A. Roazzi, A.M. Nascimento, M.R. Carvalho, Epistemologia e representações sociais: Reflexões a partir de um paradigma emergente na pesquisa psicossocial - complexidade interconexão. In Anais do V Encontro de Estudos e Pesquisas Interdisciplinares em Representações Sociais: Teoria, Pesquisa e intervenção (Editora da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2003), pp. 332–339Google Scholar
  91. A. Roazzi, B.C. Souza, M.M. Roazzi, Representações sociais e a transmissão intergeracional de status social e educacional, in Cognição e Aprendizagem: Promoção do sucesso escolar, ed. by G.C. Lemos, L.S. Almeida (ADIPSIEDUC, Braga, 2015a), pp. 68–109Google Scholar
  92. A. Roazzi, B.C. Souza, W. Bilsky, Facet Theory: Searching for Structure in Complex Social, Cultural and Psychological Phenomena (Editora Universitária da UFPE, Recife, 2015b)Google Scholar
  93. J. Rost, C.H. Carstensen, Multidimensional rasch measurement via item component models and faceted designs. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 26(1), 42–56 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621602026001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. S.S. Schiftmann, M.L. Reynolds, F.W. Young, Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. Theory, Methods and Application (Academic Press, London, 1981)Google Scholar
  95. I.M. Schlesinger, L. Guttman, Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests. Psychol. Bull. 71, 95–100 (1969)Google Scholar
  96. S. Shye, Louis Guttman, in Leading Personalities in Statistical Sciences, ed. by N.L. Johnson, S. Kotz (Wiley, New York, 1997), pp. 112–117Google Scholar
  97. S. Shye, D. Elizur, Introduction to Facet Theory (Sage, London, 1994)Google Scholar
  98. H.A. Simon, Discussion: cognition and social behavior, in Cognition and Social Behavior, ed. by J.S. Carroll, J. W. Payne (Wiley, New York, 1976)Google Scholar
  99. B.C. Souza, F.M.C. Souza, A. Roazzi, A.M. Lula, The lack of a treatment of uncertainty in facet theory: a relevant problem? in Facet Theory: Searching for Structure in Complex Social, Cultural and Psychological Phenomena, ed. by A. Roazzi, B.C. de Souza, W. Bilsky (Editora UFPE, Recife, 2015), pp. 54–64Google Scholar
  100. B.C. Souza, A.L. Wanderley, F.M.C. Souza, A. Roazzi, Probability distributions and confidence intervals for SSA partitioning using R, in 15th International Facet Theory Conference - Conference Proceedings (Fordham University Press, New York, 2016), pp. 182–187Google Scholar
  101. E. Yaniv, Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36(3), 590–592 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. E. Zvulun, Multidimensional Scalogram analysis: The method and its application, in Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences, ed. by b. S. Shye, vol. 1978, (Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1978), pp. 237–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Roazzi
    • 1
  • Bruno Campello de Souza
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de PsicologiaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências AdministrativasUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations