Workforce Preparation: Academic Curricula and Concerns
Despite increasing emphasis for more than two decades on utilizing a process of evidence-based practice or evidence-supported treatment models, a gap remains between what we know works and what we actually do. Curriculum development and instruction in professional degree programs are significant contributing factors to this research-to-practice gap. Curricula are developed by faculty and reviewed and approved (or not) by faculty committees. Faculty concerns or misconceptions, their knowledge and experience, can support, slow, or impede the integration of evidence-based practice and implementation science into academic workforce preparation. Faculty opinions and beliefs, what they know or don’t know, what they can or cannot do, shape academic and field curricula. Logically, in addition to professional values and ethics, advances in science, funding source expectations and the related needs of service systems and organizations should inform the focus and content of curricula.
KeywordsAcademic curricula Evidence-based practice Faculty Implementation science Workforce preparation
- Barwick, M. (2011). Master’s level clinician competencies in child and youth behavioral healthcare. Emotional & Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 11(2), 32–39.Google Scholar
- Bertram, R. M., Blase, K. A., & Fixsen, D. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487.Google Scholar
- Bertram, R. M., Charnin, L. A., Kerns, S. E. U., & Long, A. C. (2015). Evidence-based practices in North American MSW curricula. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 737-748.Google Scholar
- Bertram, R. M., Choi, S. W., & Elsen, M. (2018). Integrating implementation science and evidence-based practice into academic and field curricula. Journal of Social Work Education, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Cannata, E., Marlowe, D.B., Bertram, R. Kerns, S.E.U., Wolfe, S. & Choi, S. (in progress). A comparison of evidence-based practice in social work and marriage and family therapy master degree programs.Google Scholar
- Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education. (2017). Accreditation standards: Graduate & post-graduate marriage and family therapy training programs, version 12.0. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
- Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
- Insel, T. (2015, July 14). Post by former NIMH director Thomas Insel: Quality counts [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2015/quality-counts.shtml.
- Institute of Medicine. (2015). Psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: A framework for establishing evidence-based standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Karam, E. A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2010). The research-informed clinician: A guide to training the next generation MFT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(3), 307–319.Google Scholar
- Owenz, M., & Hall, S. R. (2011). Bridging the research-practice gap in psychotherapy training: Qualitative analysis of master’s students’ experiences in a student-led research and practice team. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(1).Google Scholar
- Raimy, V. (Ed.). (1950). Training in clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar