Advertisement

Workforce Preparation: Academic Curricula and Concerns

  • Rosalyn BertramEmail author
  • Suzanne Kerns
Chapter

Abstract

Despite increasing emphasis for more than two decades on utilizing a process of evidence-based practice or evidence-supported treatment models, a gap remains between what we know works and what we actually do. Curriculum development and instruction in professional degree programs are significant contributing factors to this research-to-practice gap. Curricula are developed by faculty and reviewed and approved (or not) by faculty committees. Faculty concerns or misconceptions, their knowledge and experience, can support, slow, or impede the integration of evidence-based practice and implementation science into academic workforce preparation. Faculty opinions and beliefs, what they know or don’t know, what they can or cannot do, shape academic and field curricula. Logically, in addition to professional values and ethics, advances in science, funding source expectations and the related needs of service systems and organizations should inform the focus and content of curricula.

Keywords

Academic curricula Evidence-based practice Faculty Implementation science Workforce preparation 

References

  1. Barwick, M. (2011). Master’s level clinician competencies in child and youth behavioral healthcare. Emotional & Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 11(2), 32–39.Google Scholar
  2. Bertram, R. M., Blase, K. A., & Fixsen, D. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487.Google Scholar
  3. Bertram, R. M., Charnin, L. A., Kerns, S. E. U., & Long, A. C. (2015). Evidence-based practices in North American MSW curricula. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 737-748.Google Scholar
  4. Bertram, R. M., Choi, S. W., & Elsen, M. (2018). Integrating implementation science and evidence-based practice into academic and field curricula. Journal of Social Work Education, 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. Bertram, R. M., King, K., Pederson, R., & Nutt, J. (2014). Program implementation: An examination of the interface of curriculum and practice. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 598–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruns, E. J., Kerns, S. E. U., Pullmann, M. D., Hensley, S. W., Lutterman, T., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2015). Research, data, and evidence-based treatment use in state behavioral health systems, 2001–2012. Psychiatric Services, 67(5), 496–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannata, E., Marlowe, D.B., Bertram, R. Kerns, S.E.U., Wolfe, S. & Choi, S. (in progress). A comparison of evidence-based practice in social work and marriage and family therapy master degree programs.Google Scholar
  9. Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education. (2017). Accreditation standards: Graduate & post-graduate marriage and family therapy training programs, version 12.0. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Drabick, D. A., & Goldfried, M. R. (2000). Training the scientist–practitioner for the 21st century: Putting the bloom back on the rose. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
  16. Frank, G. (1984). The Boulder model: History, rationale, and critique. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard, M. O., McMillen, J. C., & Pollio, D. E. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Journal of Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 234–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Insel, T. (2015, July 14). Post by former NIMH director Thomas Insel: Quality counts [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/directors/thomas-insel/blog/2015/quality-counts.shtml.
  19. Institute of Medicine. (2015). Psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: A framework for establishing evidence-based standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kanary, P. J., Bertram, R. M., & Bernstein, D. (2017). The child and family evidence-based practice consortium: Pathways to the future. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 98(1), 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Ayers, W. A., & Rodgers, A. (1990). Empirical and clinical focus of child and adolescent psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karam, E. A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2010). The research-informed clinician: A guide to training the next generation MFT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(3), 307–319.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, A. S., Templeton, G. B., Stinson, M. A., & Codone, S. (2016). Teaching research methods to MFT Master’s students: A comparison between scientist-practitioner and research-informed approaches. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oka, M., & Whiting, J. (2013). Bridging the clinician/researcher gap with systemic research: The case for process research, dyadic, and sequential analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Owenz, M., & Hall, S. R. (2011). Bridging the research-practice gap in psychotherapy training: Qualitative analysis of master’s students’ experiences in a student-led research and practice team. North American Journal of Psychology, 13(1).Google Scholar
  26. Parker, E. O., Chang, J., & Thomas, V. (2016). A content analysis of quantitative research in journal of marital and family therapy: A 10-year review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parrish, D. E., & Rubin, A. (2012). Social workers’ orientations toward the evidence-based practice process: A comparison with psychologists and licensed marriage and family therapists. Social Work, 57(3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Proctor, E. K. (2007). Implementing evidence-based practice in social work education: Principles, strategies, and partnerships. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(5), 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raimy, V. (Ed.). (1950). Training in clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Silverman, W. K., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2008). The second special issue on evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents: A 10-year update. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stith, S. M. (2014). What does this mean for graduate education in marriage and family therapy? commentary on “The divide between ‘evidenced–based’ approaches and practitioners of traditional theories of family therapy”. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(1), 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (2011). The quest for evidence-based practice: A view from the United States. Journal of Social Work, 11, 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor, School of Social WorkUniversity of Missouri–Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Research Associate Professor, Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations