Advertisement

Development Outcomes of Training for Online Freelancing in the Philippines

  • Karsten EskelundEmail author
  • Richard Heeks
  • Brian Nicholson
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 933)

Abstract

Impact sourcing focuses on training and hiring people who would otherwise not be able to land a job in the outsourcing business. The Philippine Government has initiated a training program to prepare people for online freelancing in socio-economically disadvantaged areas in the country.

We lack knowledge about the impact such training programs might have on marginalized individuals. Thus, this paper adds to previous research on impact sourcing by analyzing whether government-initiated training enables people in socio-economically disadvantaged areas to obtain online freelancing jobs. We analyze data from a survey and interviews with the Choice Framework.

We used an explanatory, mixed-methods approach. We used a survey to gather information from the trainees about their perception of the training. We also conducted interviews with trainees in selected locations.

The findings indicate that the trainees gained both technical and personal skills that enabled them to target jobs for which they were previously not qualified. However, structural challenges remained, such as a lack of a stable Internet connection in some areas.

This paper adds to previous research about impact sourcing, by examining how training can help marginalized people to obtain online freelancing jobs.

Keywords

Employability Digital development Choices Training 

References

  1. 1.
    Bass, J., Nicholson, B., Subhramanian, E.: A framework using institutional analysis and the capability approach in ICT4D. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 9, 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmel, E., Lacity, M.C., Doty, A.: The impact of impact sourcing: framing a research agenda. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds.) Information Systems Outsourcing. PI, pp. 397–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Creswell, J.: Research Design. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DFID: Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DICT: Rural Empowerment and Impact Sourcing Training Project. Manila (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duncombe, R.: Using the livelihoods framework to analyze ICT applications for poverty reduction through microenterprise. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 3(3), 81–100 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerster, R., Zimmermann, S.: Information and communications technologies (ICTs) for poverty reduction? Bern (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    GISC: What is the Impact Sourcing Standard? (2018). https://gisc.bsr.org/impact-sourcing/impact-sourcing-standard. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
  9. 9.
    Heeks, R., Arun, S.: Social outsourcing as a development tool: the impact of outsourcing IT services to women’s social enterprises in Kerala. J. Int. Dev. 22(4), 441–454 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huberman, A.M., Miles, M.B., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ismail, S.A., Aman, A.: Impact Sourcing Initiatives in Malaysia: An Insight Through Porter’s Diamond Framework BT - State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence, pp. 197–214 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–93 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.2307/249410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleine, D.: ICT4What? - using the Choice Framework to operationalise the capability approach to development. In: 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), pp. 108–117 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTD.2009.5426717
  14. 14.
    Kleine, D.: The capability approach and the “medium of choice”: steps towards conceptualising information and communication technologies for development. Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(2), 119–130 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9251-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kleine, D.: Technologies of Choice?. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuek, S.C., Paradi-Guilford, T., Fayomi, C.M., Imaizumi, S., Ipeirotis, P.: The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing, Washington, D.C. (2015). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/138371468000900555/The-global-opportunity-in-online-outsourcing
  17. 17.
    Lacity, M.C., Khan, S.A., Yan, A.: Review of the empirical business services sourcing literature: an update and future directions. J. Inf. Technol. 31(3), 269–328 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacity, M.C., Rottman, J., Carmel, E.: Impact sourcing: employing prison inmates to perform digitally-enabled business services. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34(1), 913–932 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madon, S., Sharanappa, S.: Social IT outsourcing and development: theorising the linkage. Inf. Syst. J. 23(5), 381–399 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malik, F., Nicholson, B., Heeks, R.: Understanding the development implications of online outsourcing. In: Choudrie, J., Islam, M.S., Wahid, F., Bass, J.M., Priyatma, J.E. (eds.) ICT4D 2017. IAICT, vol. 504, pp. 425–436. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59111-7_35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKenna, B., Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: Social media in qualitative research: challenges and recommendations. Inf. Org. 27(2), 87–99 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nicholson, B., Heeks, R., Sahay, S.: Information systems journal special issue on: global sourcing and development: new drivers, models and impacts. Inf. Syst. J. 25(1), 61–63 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nussbaum, M.: Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandeep, M.S., Ravishankar, M.N.: Impact sourcing ventures and local communities: a frame alignment perspective. Inf. Syst. J. 26(2), 127–155 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Searle, M.: Martial Law and Trust: Humanitarian Challenges in Marawi (2017). https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10220/43791?show=full#.WmnF4FK3ULU.mendeley. Accessed 25 Jan 2018
  26. 26.
    UNDP: Human Development Reports (2016). http://hdr.undp.org/en/2016-report. Accessed 4 Feb 2018
  27. 27.
    Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 320–330 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin, R.: Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yousafzai, M.: I am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and was Shot by the Taliban. Little Brown, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alliance Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Centre for Development InformaticsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations