Advertisement

Identifying the Constructs and Agile Capabilities of Data Governance and Data Management: A Review of the Literature

  • Theresa LillieEmail author
  • Sunet EybersEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 933)

Abstract

Data has become an invaluable asset to organisations. However, it is evident from the existing literature that despite the increased awareness of the importance of their data assets, many organisations fail to manage and govern these assets with the agility required in a highly competitive and volatile business environment. For data governance to be effective and sustainable in a turbulent, increasingly regulated and competitive organisational environment, all of the elements of data governance should enable and support agility in the organisation’s management of its data and information assets. As a result of increased local and global data regulations, a high reliance on technical skills, and economic constraints, organisations in developing countries have experienced challenges with implementing data governance programs. Governance within an organisation comprises the internal processes and policies that enable human capital performance, legal and regulatory compliance, and organisational alignment. There is no single approach to achieving successful data governance, and factors pertaining to the organisation’s strategy, structure, business requirements and culture need to be considered. In this study, a systematic review of existing academic literature was conducted to investigate (1) the scope and constructs of data governance and data management, (2) the agile capabilities that are required in data governance and data management for the timeous delivery of useful data to business, and (3) the need for African organisations to establish agile capabilities in their data governance and data management functions. The results of this review should be helpful with assisting organisations in African countries to achieve agility in the governance and management of data, that supports business requirements and organisational agility.

Keywords

Data Governance Data Management Organisational agility Agile governance Complex Adaptive Systems Agile capabilities 

References

  1. 1.
    Luna, A.J.H.d.O., Kruchten, P., de Moura, H.P.: Agile Governance Theory: conceptual development. In: Conference Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Management of Technology and Information Systems. FEA-USP, São Paulo (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DalleMule, L., Davenport, T.H.: What’s your data strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(3), 112–121 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ofner, M.H., Huener, K.M., Otto, B.: Dealing with complexity: a method to adapt and implement a maturity model for corporate data quality management. In: AMCIS 2009 Proceedings. AISeL (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bank for International Settlements: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting (2013). https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs239.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2018
  5. 5.
    Chakravorty, R.: BCBS239: reasons, impacts, framework and route to compliance. J. Secur. Oper. Custody 8(1), 65–81 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Otto, B.: A morphology of the organisation of data governance. In: ECIS 2011 Proceedings. AISeL (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., Morrison, R.: Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions Better Results. Harvard Business School, Massachusetts (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jia, L., Hall, D., Song, J.: The conceptualization of data-driven decision making capability. In: Proceedings of Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems. AISeL (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otto, B.: Quality and value of the data resource in large enterprises. Inf. Syst. Manag. 32(3), 234–251 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DAMA International: DAMA-DMBOK2 Framework (2014). https://www.dama.org. Accessed 26 Apr 2016
  11. 11.
    Khatri, V., Brown, C.V.: Designing data governance. Commun. ACM 53(1), 148–152 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber, K., Otto, B., Österle, H.: One size does not fit all - a contingency approach to data governance. ACM J. Data Inf. Qual. 1(1), 1–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salido, J.: Data governance for privacy, confidentiality and compliance: a holistic approach. ISACA J. 6, 1–7 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Appelbaum, S.H., Calla, R., Desautels, D., Hasan, L.: The challenges of organizational agility (part 1). Ind. Commer. Train. 49(1), 6–14 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., Hameed, K.: A systematic literature review of data governance and cloud data governance. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 1–21 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamioka, T., Luo, X., Tapanainen, T.: An empirical investigation of data governance: the role of accountabilities. In: PACIS 2016 Proceedings. AISeL (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nielsen, O.B.: A comprehensive review of data governance literature. In: Selected Papers of the IRIS, vol. 8, pp. 120–133 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brous, P., Overtoom, I., Herder, P., Versluis, A., Janssen, M.: Data infrastructures for asset management viewed as complex adaptive systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 36, 124–130 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al Qassimi, N., Rusu, L.: IT governance in a public organization in a developing country: a case study of a governmental organization. Procedia Comput. Sci. 64, 450–456 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Were, V., Moturi, C.: Toward a data governance model for the Kenya health professional regulatory authorities. TQM J. 29(4), 579–589 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Templier, M., Paré, G.: A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 37, 112–137 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    UNESCAP: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2009). http://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance. Accessed 5 May 2016
  24. 24.
    Avery, A.A., Cheek, K.: Analytics governance: towards a definition and framework. In: Proceedings of Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico. AISeL (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Institute of Directors in Southern Africa: King IV: Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2016, Institute of Directors Southern Africa (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A.: Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Q. 35(2), 463–486 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fruehauf, J., Al-Khalifa, F., Coniker, J.: Using the Bolman and Deal’s four frames in developing a data governance strategy. Issues Inform. Syst. 16(2), 161–167 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Redman, T.C.: Data Driven, 1st edn. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luna, A.J.H.d.O., Kruchten, P., do E. Pedrosa, M.L., de Almeida Neto, H.R., de Moura, H.P.: State of the art of agile governance: a systematic review. J. Comput. Sci. Inform. Technol. (IJCSIT) 6(5), 121–141 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ladley, J.: Data Governance: How to Design, Deploy, And Sustain An Effective Data Governance Program. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lewin, R.: Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, London (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dooley, K.: Complex adaptive systems: a nominal definition. Chaos Netw. 8(1), 2–3 (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Myburgh, B.A.: Complex adaptive responses of organizational teams. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 4(1), 23–39 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seiner, R.S.: Non-invasive Data Governance, 1st edn. Technics Publications LLC, New Jersey (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anderson, P.: Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3), 216–232 (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rick, U., Vossen, R., Richert, A., Henning, K.: Designing agile processes in information management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cockburn, A., Highsmith, J.: Agile software development, the people factor. Computer 34(11), 131–133 (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wageeh, N.A.: Organizational agility: the key to organizational success. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 11(5), 296–309 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bolman, L.G., Deal, T.E.: Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Martini, A., Bosch, J., Pareto, L.: Enablers and inhibitors for speed with reuse. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Software Product Line Conference, pp, 116–125. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rys, M.: Scalable SQL. Commun. ACM 54(6), 48–53 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wixom, B.H., Yen, B., Relich, M.: Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Q. Exec. 12(2), 111–123 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mann, L.: Left to other peoples’ devices? A political economy perspective on the big data revolution in development. Dev. Change 49(1), 3–36 (2017)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Redman, T.C.: Data’s Credibility Problem (2013). https://hbr.org/2013/12/datas-credibility-problem. Accessed 9 Apr 2016
  45. 45.
    Tallon, P.P., Ramirez, R.V., Short, J.E.: The information artifact in IT governance: toward a theory of information governance. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30(3), 141–178 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nagle, T., Sammon, D.: The data value map: a framework for developing shared understanding on data initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AISeL (2017)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hardy, C., Leonard, J.: Governance, risk and compliance (GRC): conceptual muddle and technological tangle. In: ACIS Proceedings, Association for Information Systems. AISeL (2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pawelke, A., Cañares, M., Hernandez, K., Martin, P.P.: Data for Development: What’s Next?. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Bonn and Eschborn (2017)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Korhonen, J., Melleri, I., Hiekkanen, K., Helenius, M.: Designing data governance structure: an organizational perspective. GSTF J. Comput. (JoC) 2(4), 11–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van Schalkwyk, F., Wilmers, M., Czerniewicz, L.: Open Data in the Governance of South African Higher Education. OpenUCT, Cape Town (2014)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
  52. 52.
    Azumah, K.K., Quarshie, H.O.: Towards higher quality data: impact of perception of data quality on IT investment – ghana. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inform. Sci. 3(12), 1614–1621 (2012)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    el Abed, W., Brillant, P., Njonko, F.: Governance of organizational data and information. In: Topi, H., Tucker, A. (eds.) Computing Handbook Third Edition: Information Systems and Information Technology, pp. 1–30. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Smith, H.A., McKeen, J.D.: Developments in practice XXX: master data management: salvation or snake oil? Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 23(4), 63–72 (2008)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 26 Feb 2018
  56. 56.
    Otto, B.: Organizing Data Governance: findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 29(1), 45–66 (2011)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Armitage, A., Keeble-Allen, D.: Undertaking a structured literature review or structuring a literature review: tales from the field. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 6(2), 103–114 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaHatfieldSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations