Advertisement

Building Empathy for Design Thinking in e-Health: A Zimbabwean Case Study

  • Masiya Alex MarufuEmail author
  • Alta van der Merwe
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 933)

Abstract

The challenges of healthcare delivery in Africa are well documented. Advances in technology present an opportunity to address some of these challenges in a cost-effective manner. Notwithstanding these advances, many initiatives fail to deliver the desired benefits, with a lack of citizen engagement cited as one of the reasons for this failure. Design thinking is an approach to innovation that places human needs at the centre of design by gaining empathy with those for whom the designs are initiated. This paper reports on the empathy building conducted in trying to understand the needs of mothers seeking post-natal care in a low-income neighbourhood in Zimbabwe. Through interviews, observations, journals, and using service-dominant logic theory to analyse the output, a picture emerges of the lives of the mothers and babies, and their interaction with the healthcare system. Working in teams with mobile application developers and nurses, the mothers participate in a workshop that produces points of view that define problems the teams would like addressed, using technology in a design thinking exercise.

This paper reports on the work of hospital midwives, and chronicles the lives of several mothers in the eight weeks after giving birth. It also sets out four design challenges based on the points of view derived from the design thinking workshops.

Keywords

Design thinking e-Health Service dominant logic Zimbabwe 

References

  1. 1.
    Dixon, A., Figueras, J., Kutzin, J.: Funding Health Care: Options for Europe. McGraw Hill, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Pasquale, D., Padula, M., Scala, P.L., Biocca, L., Paraciani, D.: Advancements in ICT for healthcare and wellbeing: towards Horizon 2020. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jahan, S., Chowdhury, M.M.H.: Assessment of present health status in Bangladesh and the applicability of e-health in healthcare services. World J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 1(6), 121–124 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandrasekhar, C.P., Ghosh, J.: Information and communication technologies and health in low income countries: the potential and the constraints. Bull. World Health Organ. 79(9), 850–855 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, T.: Change by Design. HarperBusiness, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    le Roux, E.: Design thinking in South Africa: An exploratory study among Johannesburg design agencies using force field analysis. The Independent Institute of Education, Creative Brand Leadership (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tschimmel, K.: Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. In: The XXIII ISPIM Conference – Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. ISPIM, Barcelona (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L.: Understanding Innovation Design Thinking Research: Studying Co-creation in Practice. Springer, Berlin (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. 8(1), 30–35 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magnusson, P.R., Matthing, J., Kristen, P.: Managing user involvement in service innovation : experiments with innovating end users. J. Serv. Res. 6(2), 111–124 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown, T.: Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, Massachusetts, June 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. School. (D. School, Producer), 19 February 2016. http://dschool.stanford.edu/. Accessed 19 Feb 2016
  13. 13.
    The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. IDEO, Canada (2015). www.IDEO.Org
  14. 14.
    Wagner, B.: Motivation, leadership and emotional intelligence in the hospitality industry. In: Proceedings of the QUIS13 International Research Symposium on Service Excellence in Management, Karlstad, Sweden (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vianna, M., Vianna, Y., Adler, I.K., Lucena, B., Russo, B.: Design Thinking : Business Innovation. MJV Tecnologia ltda, Rio de Janeiro (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liedtka, J.: Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 32(6), 925–938 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edman, K.W.: Exploring overlaps and differences in service dominant logic and design thinking. In: DeThinking Service; ReThinking Design, vol. 59, pp. 201–212. Linköping University Electronic Press (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic 2025. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34(1), 46–67 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marufu M.A., van der Merwe A.: Using service-dominant logic to build empathy for design thinking in a health service delivery environment. In: Yang, X.S., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds.) Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 797. Springer, Singapore (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_46Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wickramasinghe, N.S., Fadalla, A.M.A., Geislet, E., Schaffer, J.L.: A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. J. Electron. Healthc. 1(3), 316–334 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Westbrook, J.I., Braithwaite, J.: Will information and communication technology disrupt the health system and deliver on its promise? MJA 193(7), 399 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ricciardi, L., Mostashari, F., Murphy, J., Daniel, J.G., Siminerio, E.P.: A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. Health Aff. 32(2), 376–384 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Georgiou, A.: Data, information and knowledge: the health informatics model and its role in evidence based medicine. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 8(2), 127–130 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mettler, T., Raptis, D.A.: What constitutes the field of health information systems? Fostering a systematic framework and research agenda. Health Inform. J. 18(2), 147–156 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Werner, D., Thurman, C., Maxwell, J.: Handbook, Where There Is No Doctor: A Village Health Care. Hesperien Health Guides (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics DepartmentUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations