Connecting Researchers to Data Repositories in the Earth, Space, and Environmental Sciences
The Repository Finder tool was developed to help researchers in the domain of Earth, space, and environmental sciences to identify appropriate repositories where they can deposit their research data and to promote practices that implement the FAIR Principles, encouraging progress toward sharing data that are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Requirements for the design of the tool were gathered through a series of workshops and working groups as a part of the Enabling FAIR Data initiative led by the American Geophysical Union that included the development of a decision tree that researchers may follow in selecting a data repository, interviews with domain repository managers, and usability testing. The tool is hosted on the web by DataCite and enables a researcher to query all data repositories by keyword or to view a list of domain repositories that accept data for deposit, support open access, and provide persistent identifiers. Metadata records from the re3data.org registry of research data repositories and the returned results highlight repositories that have achieved trustworthy digital repository certification through a formal procedure such as the CoreTrust Seal.
KeywordsResearch data management FAIR principles Geosciences Repositories Data facilities Recommender systems
Enabling FAIR Data was made possible by a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to the American Geophysical Union; program manager, Shelley Stall. Sabbatical support for Michael Witt was provided in part by the Pufendorf Institute of Advanced Studies at Lund University.
- 1.Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016)Google Scholar
- 2.Cruse, P., Servilla, M.: Workflow Recommendations for Enabling FAIR Data in the Earth, Space, and Environmental Sciences, Zenodo (2018). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1445839
- 3.Buddenbohm, S., De Jong, M., Priddy, M., Moranville, Y., Ribbe, P.: Open Data in the Humanities Platform: Humanities at Scale: Evolving the DARIAH ERIC, DARIAH; DANS-KNAW (2017). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01686320
- 4.ISO 16363:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems – Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories (2012). https://www.iso.org/standard/56510.html
- 5.Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Extended Guidance (2018). https://www.coretrustseal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/20180629-CTS-Extended-Guidance-v1.1.pdf
- 6.Witt, M.: Co-designing, co-developing, and co-implementing an institutional data repository service. J. Libr. Adm. 52(2), 172–188 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Whyte, A.: Where to Keep Research Data: DCC Checklist for Evaluating Data Repositories Version 1.1, Digital Curation Centre (2016). http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides-checklists/where-keep-research-data/where-keep-research-data
- 8.Plante, R., Witt, M.: Interview Questions for Determining Data Repository FAIR Compliance, Zenodo (2018). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1432515
- 9.Rücknagel, J., et al.: Metadata Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories: version 3.0, p. 29 (2015). http://doi.org/10.2312/re3.008
- 10.Nielsen, J.: 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design, Nielsen Norman Group (1995). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics