Digital Libraries for Open Science: Using a Socio-Technical Interaction Network Approach
This paper argues that using Socio-Technical Interaction Networks to build on extensively-used Digital Library infrastructures for supporting Open Science knowledge environments. Using a more social -technical approach could lead to an evolutionary reconceptualization of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries being used as knowledge environments, built upon on the document repositories, will also emphasize the importance of user interaction and collaboration in carrying out those activities. That is to say, the primary goal of Digital Libraries is to help users convert information into knowledge; therefore, Digital Libraries examined in light of socio-technical interaction networks have the potential to shift Digital Libraries from individual, isolated collections to more interoperable, interconnected knowledge-creating repositories that support an evolving relationship between open science users and the Digital Library environment.
KeywordsDigital libraries Open science Socio-Technical Interaction Networks
Thank you to my fellow Ph.D. colleagues for their advice and collegial discussions about theory and methodology. Thanks especially to Rich Gazan, D.B. and Wiebke Reile.
- 5.Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Lamb, R., Sawyer, S., Kling, R.: A social informatics perspective on soc10- technical networks. In: Chung, H.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Long Beach, CA (2000)Google Scholar
- 12.Meyer, E., Kling, R.: Leveling the playing field, or expanding the bleachers? Socio-Technical Interaction Networks and arXiv.org (Center for Social Informatics Working Paper Series WP-02-10) (2002)Google Scholar
- 13.Eschenfelder, K., Chase, L.: Socio-technical networks of large, post- implementation web information systems: tracing effects and influences. In: 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii (2002)Google Scholar
- 15.Joung, K., Rosenbaum, H.: Digital libraries as socio-technical interaction networks: A study of the American Memory Project. In Paper presented at the ASIST 2004 Annual Meeting; ‘Managing and Enhancing Information: Cultures and Conflicts’ (ASIST AM 04), Providence, Rhode Island (2004)Google Scholar
- 17.Pinch, T., Bijker, W.: The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 17–50. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
- 18.Law, J.: After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 1–14. Maiden, Blackwell. (1999)Google Scholar
- 19.Meyer, E.T.: Socio-Technical Perspectives on Digital Photography: Scientific Digital Photography Use by Marine Mammal Researchers. Indiana University, Bloomington (2007)Google Scholar
- 21.Contractor, N., Monge, P., Leonardi, P.: Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: bringing technology inside the network. Int. J. Commun. 5(39), 682–720 (2011)Google Scholar
- 23.Meyer, E.T.: Examining the hyphen: the value of social informatics for research and teaching. In: Fichman, P., Rosenbaum, H. (eds.) Social Informatics: Past, Present and Future, pp. 56–73. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar