Digital Libraries for Open Science: Using a Socio-Technical Interaction Network Approach

  • Jennifer E. BeamerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 988)


This paper argues that using Socio-Technical Interaction Networks to build on extensively-used Digital Library infrastructures for supporting Open Science knowledge environments. Using a more social -technical approach could lead to an evolutionary reconceptualization of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries being used as knowledge environments, built upon on the document repositories, will also emphasize the importance of user interaction and collaboration in carrying out those activities. That is to say, the primary goal of Digital Libraries is to help users convert information into knowledge; therefore, Digital Libraries examined in light of socio-technical interaction networks have the potential to shift Digital Libraries from individual, isolated collections to more interoperable, interconnected knowledge-creating repositories that support an evolving relationship between open science users and the Digital Library environment.


Digital libraries Open science Socio-Technical Interaction Networks 



Thank you to my fellow Ph.D. colleagues for their advice and collegial discussions about theory and methodology. Thanks especially to Rich Gazan, D.B. and Wiebke Reile.


  1. 1.
    Blandford, A., Buchanan, G., Jones, M.: Usability of digital libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4(2), 69–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgman, C.L., et al.: Knowledge infrastructures in science: data, diversity, and digital libraries. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 16(3–4), 207–227 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgman, C.: What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Inf. Process. Manage. 35, 227–243 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bearman, D.: Digital libraries. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 41, 223–272 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Munafò, M.R., et al.: A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1(1), 0021 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kling, R., Scacchi, W.: The web of computing: computer technology as social organization. Adv. Comput. 21, 1–90 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scacchi, W.: Socio-technical interaction networks in free/open source software development processes. In: Acuna, S.T., Juristo, N. (eds.) Software Process Modeling, pp. 1–27. Springer Science & Business Media Inc., New York (2005). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H.: Social informatics in information science: an introduction. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 49, 1047–1052 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lamb, R., Sawyer, S., Kling, R.: A social informatics perspective on soc10- technical networks. In: Chung, H.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Long Beach, CA (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kling, R., McKim, G., King, A.: A bit more to IT: scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 54(1), 46–67 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer, E., Kling, R.: Leveling the playing field, or expanding the bleachers? Socio-Technical Interaction Networks and (Center for Social Informatics Working Paper Series WP-02-10) (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eschenfelder, K., Chase, L.: Socio-technical networks of large, post- implementation web information systems: tracing effects and influences. In: 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, Hawaii (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barab, S., Schatz, S., Scheckler, R.: Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind Culture Activity 11(1), 25–47 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joung, K., Rosenbaum, H.: Digital libraries as socio-technical interaction networks: A study of the American Memory Project. In Paper presented at the ASIST 2004 Annual Meeting; ‘Managing and Enhancing Information: Cultures and Conflicts’ (ASIST AM 04), Providence, Rhode Island (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams, R., Edge, D.: The social shaping of technology. Res. Policy 25, 856–899 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pinch, T., Bijker, W.: The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Bijker, W., Hughes, T., Pinch, T. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 17–50. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Law, J.: After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 1–14. Maiden, Blackwell. (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meyer, E.T.: Socio-Technical Perspectives on Digital Photography: Scientific Digital Photography Use by Marine Mammal Researchers. Indiana University, Bloomington (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35(5), 601–617 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Contractor, N., Monge, P., Leonardi, P.: Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: bringing technology inside the network. Int. J. Commun. 5(39), 682–720 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lamb, R., Kling, R.: Reconceptualizing users and social actors m information systems research. MIS Q. 27(2), 197–235 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer, E.T.: Examining the hyphen: the value of social informatics for research and teaching. In: Fichman, P., Rosenbaum, H. (eds.) Social Informatics: Past, Present and Future, pp. 56–73. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sawyer, S.: Social informatics: overview, principles and opportunities. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 31(5), 9–12 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.The Claremont Colleges LibraryClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations