On Synergies Between Information Retrieval and Digital Libraries
In this paper we present the results of a longitudinal analysis of ACM SIGIR papers from 2003 to 2017. ACM SIGIR is the main venue where Information Retrieval (IR) research and innovative results are presented yearly; it is a highly competitive venue and only the best and most relevant works are accepted for publication. The analysis of ACM SIGIR papers gives us a unique opportunity to understand where the field is going and what are the most trending topics in information access and search.
In particular, we conduct this analysis with a focus on Digital Library (DL) topics to understand what is the relation between these two fields that we know to be closely linked. We see that DL provide document collections and challenging tasks to be addressed by the IR community and in turn exploit the latest advancements in IR to improve the offered services.
We also point to the role of public investments in the DL field as one of the core drivers of DL research which in turn may also have a positive effect on information accessing and searching in general.
KeywordsTrends in digital libraries (DL) Trends in information retrieval (IR) Emerging interrelationships between DL and IR
The work was partially funded by the “Computational Data Citation” (CDC) STARS-StG project of the University of Padua. The work was also partially funded by the “DAta BenchmarK for Keyword-based Access and Retrieval” (DAKKAR) Starting Grants project sponsored by University of Padua and Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e di Rovigo.
- 1.GROBID (2008–2018). https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid. Accessed 16 Aug 2018
- 2.Agosti, M., Masotti, M.: Design of an OPAC database to permit different subject searching accesses in a multi-disciplines universities library catalogue database. In: Belkin, N.J., Ingwersen, P., Pejtersen, A.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21–24 June 1992, pp. 245–255. ACM (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/133160.133207
- 4.Beel, J., Aizawa, A., Breitinger, C., Gipp, B.: Mr. DLib: Recommendations-as-a-Service (RaaS) for Academia. In: 2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2017, pp. 313–314 (2017)Google Scholar
- 6.Hildreth, C.: The Online Catalogue: Developments and Directions. Library Association, London (1989)Google Scholar
- 7.Lopez, P.: GROBID: combining automatic bibliographic data recognition and term extraction for scholarship publications. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 473–474. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Macdonald, C., McCreadie, R., Santos, R.L., Ounis, I.: From puppy to maturity: experiences in developing Terrier. In: Proceedings of OSIR at SIGIR, pp. 60–63 (2012)Google Scholar
- 12.Wu, Y., Alawini, A., Davidson, S.B., Silvello, G.: Data citation: giving credit where credit is due. In: Das, G., Jermaine, C.M., Bernstein, P.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD Conference 2018, pp. 99–114. ACM Press, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3196910
- 14.Zamani, H., Croft, W.B.: Joint modeling and optimization of search and recommendation. In: Alonso, O., Silvello, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Biennial Conference on Design of Experimental Search & Information Retrieval Systems (DESIRES 2018), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Bertinoro, Italy, 28–31 August 2018, vol. 2167, pp. 36–41. CEUR-WS.org (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2167