Advertisement

On the Nyquist Frequency of Random Sampled Signals

  • Moussa HamadacheEmail author
  • Gianluca D’Elia
  • Giorgio Dalpiaz
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 15)

Abstract

In modern industry, the wide use of reliable and sophisticated sensors with their connection to internet has introduced the phenomena of Big Data, especially in the field of condition monitoring systems (CMSs) in e-maintenance applications. In particular, in the case of vibration signals, high-performance acquisition systems are required, characterized by anti-aliasing filtering and high uniform sampling rate, in order to properly digitalize the meaningful frequency content of the signals. In this context, the capability of non-uniform random sampling (RS) is assessed in this work. While in different fields, such astronomy, structural and biomedical studies, the RS is a problem to be resolved, due to the unavailability of samples at specific instants (missing data problem), in the field of fault detection & diagnosis (FDD), RS can be a chosen sampling method thanks to its advantages: anti-aliasing property and low average sampling rate. Therefore, this paper focuses on studying the anti-aliasing property of the random sampled data, verifying the criterion proposed in literature for establish the Nyquist frequency, and analyzing its sensitivity to the sampling parameters. This study is carried out using simulated signals and computing the spectral window, giving the Nyquist frequency for different random sampling parameters; moreover, a spectral analysis method, the Schuster periodogram, is used to verify when the spectrum is actually free of alias. The results show that the Nyquist frequency depends on the numerical accuracy of the randomly generated time instants.

Keywords

Random sampling Nyquist frequency Spectral window Alias and anti-aliasing Condition monitoring system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Regione Emilia-Romagna (Bando DGR 774-2015), project MetAGEAR.

References

  1. Babu P, Stoica P (2010) Spectral analysis of nonuniformly sampled data – a review. Digit Signal Proc 20:359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilinskis I (2007) Digital alias-free signal processing. ISBN: 978-0-470-02738-7Google Scholar
  3. Buzzoni M, Mucchi E, D’Elia G, Dalpiaz G (2017) Diagnosis of localized faults in multistage gearboxes: a vibrational approach by means of automatic EMD-based algorithm. Shock Vib, Article ID 8345704Google Scholar
  4. Candes E, Wakin M (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process Mag 21:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DASP-Lab System, 5. Avoiding aliasing by Nonuniform sampling. http://www.edi.lv/media/uploads/UserFiles/dasp-web/sec-5.htm. Accessed Dec 2017
  6. D’Elia G, Cocconcelli M, Mucchi E (2018) An algorithm for the simulation of faulted bearings in non-stationary conditions. Meccanica 53(4–5):1147–1166MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Elia G, Cocconcelli M, Mucchi E, Dalpiaz G (2017a) Combining blind separation and cyclostationary techniques for monitoring distributed wear in gearbox rolling bearings. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 231: 1113–1128Google Scholar
  8. D’Elia G, Mucchi E, Cocconcelli M (2017b) On the identification of the angular position of gears for the diagnostics of planetary gearboxes. Mech Syst Signal Process 83: 305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El Badaoui M, Bonnardot F (2014) Impact of angular sampling on mechanical signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 44:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eyer L, Bartholdi P (1999) Variable stars: which Nyquist frequency? Astronom Astro-phys Suppl Ser 135(1999):1–3Google Scholar
  11. Hajar M, El Badaoui M, Raad A, Bonnardot F (2017) Discrete random sampling theory and practice. Surveillance 9, Fès, MoroccoGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamadache M, Lee D, Veluvolu KC (2015) Rotor speed-based bearing fault diagnosis (RSB-BFD) under variable speed and constant load. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(10):6486–6495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lo K, Purvis A (1997) New approach for estimating spectra from randomly sampled sequences. Circuits Syst Signal Process 16(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maciejewski MW, Qui HZ, Mobli M, Hoch JC (2009) Nonuni-form sampling and spectral aliasing. J Magn Reson 199(1):88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts DH, Lehar J, Dreher JW (1987) Time series analysis with CLEAN. I. Derivation of a spectrum. Astronom J 93(4):968–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scargle JD (1982) Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys J 263:835–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapiro H, Silverman S (1960) Aliasing-free sampling of random noises. SIAM J Appl Math 8:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stoica P, Sandgren N (2006) Spectral analysis of irregularly-sampled data: paralleling the regularly-sampled data approaches. Digit Signal Process 16(6):712–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Žerovnik G, Trkov A, Kodeli IA (2012) Correlated random sampling for multivariate normal and lognormal distributions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors Assoc Equip 690:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou W, Habetler TG, Harley RG (2007) Bearing condition monitoring methods for electrical machines: a general review. In: Proceedings of the IEEE SPEEDAM, pp 6–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moussa Hamadache
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gianluca D’Elia
    • 1
  • Giorgio Dalpiaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations