Comparison of Signal Processing Techniques for Condition Monitoring Based on Artificial Neural Networks

  • M. TiboniEmail author
  • G. Incerti
  • C. Remino
  • M. Lancini
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 15)


The paper presents the results of a study aimed to compare different signal processing techniques for the condition monitoring of a mechanical system for indexing motion. Artificial feed-forward neural networks (ANN) are used as classifiers. The mechanical system can work in different conditions (variable loads and velocities, lubricant oil with different viscosity) and the ANN identifies the working condition. The monitored variable is the acceleration signal of the rotating table, opportunely pre-processed. The signal processing techniques compared are: Power Spectral Density (PSD), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Wavelet, Amplitude Probability Density Function (PDF), Higher Order Spectra (HOS).


Condition monitoring Vibrations Signal processing Neural networks 


  1. 1.
    Fitch EC (1992) Proactive maintenance for mechanical system. Elsevier, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rai A, Upadhyay SH (2016) A review on signal processing techniques utilized in the fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 96:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Unal M, Onat M, Demetgul M, Kucuk H (2014) Fault diagnosis of rolling bearings using a genetic algorithm optimized neural network. Measurement 58:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao VV, Ratnam C (2015) Estimation of defect severity in rolling element bearings using vibration signals with artificial neural network. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 9(2):113–120Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strdczkiewicz M, Barszcz T (2016) Application of artificial neural network for damage detection in planetary gearbox of wind turbine. Shock Vibr 2016. Article ID 4086324Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang S, Wu X, Liu X, Gao J, He Y (2017) Overview of condition monitoring and operation control of electric power conversion systems in direct-drive wind turbines under faults. Front Mech Eng 12(3):281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W, Ghaffari M, Liao L, Siegel D (2014) Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—reviews, methodology and applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 42:314–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kateris D, Moshou D, Pantazi X-E, Gravalos I, Sawalhi N, Loutridis S (2014) A machine learning approach for the condition monitoring of rotating machinery. J Mech Sci Technol 28(1):61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tiboni M, Remino C (2017) Condition monitoring of a mechanical indexing system with artificial neural networks. In: WCCM 2017 – 1st world conference on condition monitoring 2017, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kocur D, Stanko R (2000) Order bispectrum: a new tool for reciprocated machine condition monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 14(6):871–890 ISSN 0888-3270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical and Industrial Engineering DepartmentUniversità degli Studi di BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations