Advertisement

State of the Art in the Contribution of an Ontology-Oriented Knowledge Base to the Development of a Collaborative Information System

  • Meryam El MriniEmail author
  • El Hassan Megder
  • Mostafa El yassa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)

Abstract

This article reviews the state of the art of implementing collaborative information systems that guarantee interoperability using ontologies as a semantic dimension. It presents the implementation of different systems of collaborative information and collaborative platform. It also presents the various limitations that this type of information systems still suffers from and works that have tried to overcome its limitations and finally it gives our perspective to this topic.

Keywords

Base of knowledge Ontologies Collaborative information system Alignment Merging Interoperability 

References

  1. 1.
    IEC, Kosnake. IECTC65/290/DCstand (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE. Standard Computer Dictionary—A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EIF. European Interoperability Frame-work. White Paper, Brussels. Available on http://www.comptia.org (2004)
  4. 4.
    Athena Consortium. Public document: ATHENA General description v10. Available on http://www.athena-ip.org/ (2004)
  5. 5.
    IDEAS. A Gap Analysis–Required activities in Research, Technology and Standardization to Close the RTS Gap-Roadmaps and Recommendations on RTS Activities, IDEAS Deliverables (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    e-Gov. e-Government Unit, e-Government Interoperability frame-work, Version 6.1 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Touzi, J.: Aide à la conception de Système d’Information Collaboratif support de l’interopérabilité des entreprises. Ph.D. thesis. INPT (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benguria, G., Larrucea, X., Elveseater, B., Neple, T., Beardsmore, A., Friess, M.: Platform independent model for service oriented architectures. Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches, pp. 23–32. Springer, Berlin. ISBN-10: 1846287138 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajsiri, V.: Knowledge-based system for collaborative process specification. Ph.D. thesis. Department, Industrial Engineering, Toulouse University (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reix, R.: Systèmes d’Information et Management des Organisations, 3rd edn., p. 75. Librairie Vuibert, Paris (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Educne: Information system definition. Retrieved Oct 2006 from http://www2.educnet.education.fr/sections/superieur/glossaire/ (2006)
  12. 12.
    Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanderhaeghen, D., Zang, S., Hofer, A., Adam, O.: XML-based transformation of business process models—enabler for collaborative business process management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd GI Workshop XML4BPM, XML Interchange Formats for Business Process Management (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauer, B., Müller, J.P., Roser, S.: A Decentralized Broker Architecture for Collaborative Business Process Modelling and Enactment, Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches. Springer. ISBN-10: 1846287138 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanderhaeghen, D., Werth, D., Kahl, T., Loos, P.: Service and Process Matching—An Approach towards Interoperability Design and Implementation of Business Networks, Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches. Springer. ISBN: 978-1-84628-713-8, pp. 189–198 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Vernadat, F.: Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future. Comput. Ind 59(7), 647–659 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zribi, S.: La gouvernance SOA pour une approche de conception de Système d’information de Médiation: réconciliation non-fonctionnelle de services pour mettre en œuvre les processus métier. Ph.D. thesis. Industrial Engineering Center, School of Mines in Albi, France (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bénaben, F., Touzi, J., Rajsiri, V., Pingaud, H.: L’interopérabilité des systèmes d’information comme moyen vers l’intégration de l’écosystème industriel. In: 7 th International Congres of Industrial Engineering, Trois-Rivières, Québec (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luzeaux, D., Ruault, J.R.: Systèmes de Systèmes, Concepts et Illustrations Pratiques. Hermes Science. ISBN 978-2-7462-1875-8 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goranson, H.T.: The Agile Virtual Enterprise—Cases, Metrics, Tools, Quo-rum Books, Westport CN (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Desouza, K.: (ed.). Agile Information Systems. Routledge (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rouse, W.B.: Agile Information Systems for Agile Decision-Making. Agile Information Systems, pp. 16–30. Elsevier, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Konstantas, D., Bourrières, J.P., Léonard, M., Boudjlida, N.: Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pingaud, H., Rationalité du développement de l’interopérabilité dans les organisations, Management des technologies organisationnelles, pp. 19–30. Presses de l’école des mines de Paris, France (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bénaben, F., Mu, W., Truptil, S., Lorré, J.P., Pingaud, H.: Information Systems Design for Emerging Ecosystems: A Model Driving Approach Diving into Abstraction Layers, IEEE-DEST’10. Springer, Dubai, EAU (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bénaben, F., Boissel-Dallier, N., Pingaud, H., Lorre, J.: Semantic issues in model-driven management of information system interoperability. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 26(11), 1042–1053 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MISE (Mediation Information System Engineering), le centre genie insudtriel ecole des mines d’albi carmauxGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. Computer 25(3), 38–49 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bénaben, F., Touzi, J., Rajsiri, V., Truptil, S., Lorré, J.P., Pingaud, H.: Mediation information system design in a collaborative SOA context through a MDD approach. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Model Driven Interoperability for Sustainable Information Systems (MDISIS’08) Held in Conjunction with the CAiSE, vol. 8 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miller, J., Mukerji, J.: MDA Guide Version 1.0. 1. Object Management Group, vol. 234, p. 51 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wack, M., Cottin, N., Mignot, B., El Moudni, A.: Dossiers numériques. In: Charlet, J. (Coordinateur) Dossiers Numériques, vol. 6. Hermès. Numéro Spécial de la Revue Document Numérique, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl. Acquisit. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA (1984)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Borst, W.N.: Construction of Engineering Ontologies. University of Tweenty. Enschede, Centre for Telematica and Information Technology (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Studer, R.: Benjamins V.R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25, 161–197 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Truptil, S.: Etude de l’approche de l’interopérabilité par médiation dans le cadre d’une dynamique de collaboration appliquée à la gestion de crise. Thèse en systèmes industriels, INPT—EMAC (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wenxin, M.U.: Caractérisation métier et logique d’une situation collaborative. Ph.D. thesis. School of Mines in Albi, France (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Boissel-Dallier, N.: Aide à la conception d’un système d’information de médiation collaboratif: de la cartographie de processus métier au système exécutable. Ph.D. thesis. Institut National Polytechnique of Toulouse, France (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Truptil, S., Bénaben, F., Salatgé, N., Hanachi, C., Chapurlat, V., Pignon, J.-P., Pingaud, H.: Mediation Information System Engineering for Interoperability Support in Crisis Management (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sara, S., Rachid, B., Kenza, B.: Modeling of mediation system for enterprise systems collaboration through MDA and SOA. Ph.D. thesis. Information Logistic and Production Systems Team, National School of Applied Sciences (ENSA), Cadi Ayyad University-Marrakech (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Semar-Bitah, K., Boukhalfa, K.: Vers une architecture de modélisation des processus collaboratifs interorganisationnels. In: Conference Paper, Centre Algérien de Développement des Technologies Avancées (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abbassene, A., Alimazighi, Z.: Vers une Plateforme en Nuage pour l’intégration des Workflows Inter-Organisationnels. Journée de l’Etudiant ESI (JEESI’14), Alger (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sbai, Z., Missaoui, A., Barkaoui, K., Ayed, R.B.: On the verification of business processes by model checking techniques. In: International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering 2010, Puerto Rico, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sbai, Z., Barkaoui, K.: Vérification Formelle des Processus Workflow Collaboratifs. Conférence Francophone sur les Systèmes Collaboratifs 2012, Sousse, Tunisie (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sbai, Z.: Contribution à la modélisation et à la vérification de processus workflow. Ph.D. thesis. CNAM (National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts), France (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Luis, E. Mendoza, M.: Business process verification using a formal compositional approach and timed automata. In: XXXIX Latin American Computing Conference, Vargas, Venezuela (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    El Mansouri, R.: Modélisation et Vérification des processus métiers dans les entreprises virtuelles. Thèse en Informatique, Université Mentouri Constantine (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Faria, D., Pesquita, C., Balasubramani, B.S., Martins, C., Cardoso, J., Curado, H., Couto, F.M., Cruz, I.F.: AML results for OAEI 2016. In: Ontology Matching Workshop. CEUR (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Despres, S., Szulman, S.: Construction d’une ontologie du droit communautaire. In: IC—16èmes Journées francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances, pp. 85–96, May 2005. Nice, France, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, Grenoble (2005)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Results of the alignment evaluation imitative (2016)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kais, S.: La fusion des ontologies. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Quebec in Monteal (2014)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lamarre, P., Cazalens, S., Lemp, S., Valduriez, P.: A flexible mediation process for large distributed information systems. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE (1), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3290, pp. 19–36. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kimball, R.: The operational data warehouse. DBMS 11(1), 14–16 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mena, E., Illarramendi, A., Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.P.: Observer: an approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across preexisting ontologies. Int. J. Distrib. Parallel Databases 8(2), 223–271 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bellatreche, L., Xuan, D., Pierra, G., Dehainsala, H.: Contribution of ontology-based data modeling to automatic integration of EC within ED. Comput. Ind. J. 57(8–9), 711–724Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Khouri, S.: Modélisation conceptuelle à base ontologique d’un entrepôt de données. Mémoire de Magistère. Université Oued-Smar Alger (2009)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Diallo, G.: Efficient building of local repository of distributed ontologies. Paper Presented at IEEE Signal-Image Technology and Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 2011 Seventh International Conference, pp. 159–166. 28 Nov–1 Dec 2011, Dijon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Saïs, F., Pernelle, N., Rousset, M.-C.: L2R: a logical method for reference reconciliation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 22–26 July 2007, pp. 329–334. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zimmermann, A.: Logical formalisms for agreement technologies. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement Technologies, pp. 69–82. Springer, The Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_5 (2005)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dibie-Barthélemy, J., Haemmerlé, O., Salvat, E.: A semantic validation of conceptual graphs. Knowl.-Based Syst. 19, 498–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2005.04.002 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boussaïd, O., Ben Messaoud, R., Choquet, R., Anthoard, S.: X-warehousing: an XmL based approach for warehousing complex data. In: Proceeding of the 10th East-European Conference on Advances Databases and Information System (ADBIS06). Thessaloniki, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4152, pp. 39–54 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Abdelouhab, F.Z., Atmani, B.: Une approche cellulaire de fusion d’ontologies. J. Decis. Syst. 26 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Atmani, B., Beldjilali, B.: Knowledge discovery in database: induction graph and cellular automaton. Comput. Inf. J. 26(2), 171–197 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meryam El Mrini
    • 1
    Email author
  • El Hassan Megder
    • 1
  • Mostafa El yassa
    • 1
  1. 1.IRF-SIC LaboratoryIbn Zohr UniversityAgadirMorocco

Personalised recommendations