Entering the Reoperative Hostile Abdomen Laparoscopically

  • Laura Greco
  • Howard M. RossEmail author


Port placement for laparoscopic surgery in patients who have had prior surgeries can be complicated by the presence of anterior abdominal wall adhesions. To avoid inadvertent bowel injury, it is important to choose the location of the first laparoscopic port carefully. An important principal for laparoscopic port placement in the reoperative abdomen includes placement of ports away from prior operative sites. There is no statistical difference in rates of bowel injury between access to the abdomen achieved by open or closed laparoscopic entry, and method of entry should be determined by individual surgeon comfort and familiarity with entry method.


Laparoscopy Bowel injury Port placement Reoperative surgery 

Suggested Reading

  1. 1.
    Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(8):CD006583.
  2. 2.
    Argarwala N. Safe entry techniques during laparoscopy: left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space—a review of 918 procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW. Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(6):677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang FH, Chou HH, Lee CL, Cheng PJ, Wang CW, Soong YK. Extraumbilical insertion of the operative laparoscope in patients with extensive intraabdominal adhesions. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1995;2(3):335–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Childers J, Brzechffa P, Surwit E. Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50(2):221–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Englum BR, Hopkins MB, Migaly J. Overcoming technical challenges: reoperative surgery. In: Ross H, Lee S, Mutch M, Rivadeneira D, Steele S, editors. Minimally invasive approaches to colon and rectal disease. New York: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kothari SN, Fundell LJ, Lambert PJ, Mathiason MA. Use of transabdominal ultrasound to identify intraabdominal adhesions prior to laparoscopy: a prospective blinded study. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):843–7, ISSN 0002-96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar S. Veress needle insertion through left lower intercostal space for creating pneumoperitoneum: experience with 75 cases. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8(3):85–9. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parker J, Reid G, Wong F. Microlaparoscopic left upper quadrant entry in patients at high risk of periumbilical adhesions. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39:88–92. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Read TE, Salgado J, Ferraro D, et al. “Peek port”: a novel approach for avoiding conversion in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:477. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M, Tsin DA, Hudelist G, Stark M, Mettler L. Laparoscopy entry in patients with previous abdominal and pelvic surgery. Surg Innov. 2011;18(3):201–5. Epub 2011 Jan 18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, et al. New adhesion formation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:44. Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2004;91(10):1253–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Color Dis. 2007;9(S2):25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTemple University HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University and the Temple University Health SystemPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations