Truth commissions are one of the many tools societies may establish following a period of authoritarianism or civil war. As they are increasingly adopted, this book compares the various truth commissions that have been created in the recent past and their ability to impact human rights and violence. This chapter introduces the project and discusses why it is a significant contribution to the literature regarding post-conflict processes, transitional justice, and truth commissions.
KeywordsTransitional justice Truth commissions Post-authoritarianism Post-conflict
- ———. 2009. Group-Conflict Resolution: Sources of Resistance to Reconciliation: On Legitimacy Theory and the Effectiveness of Truth Commissions. Law & Contemporary Problems 72: 123–271.Google Scholar
- Kim, Hunjoon, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2007. Do Human Rights Trials Make a Difference. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Olsen, T.D., L.A. Payne, and A.G. Reiter. 2010a. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
- Scharf, Michael P. 1996. Case for a Permanent International Truth Commission. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 7: 375–410.Google Scholar
- Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
- Stewart, B., and E. Wiebelhaus-Brahm. 2017. The Quantitative Turn in Transitional Justice Research: What Have We Learned About Impact? Transitional Justice Review 1 (5): 97–133.Google Scholar
- Teitel, R.G. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- USIP. 2011. Truth Commission Digital Collection. http://www.usip.org/publications/truth-commission-digital-collection.
- Van der Merwe, H., V. Baxter, and A.R. Chapman. 2009. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace (USIP).Google Scholar